• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What were the main features of the Soviet Constitution of 1936 ?

Extracts from this document...


Jan 2002 - module 3 : Stalin and Revolution 1924 - 41 Qst. (1) What were the main features of the Soviet Constitution of 1936 ? (8 mks). Qst. (11) To what extent was Stalin`s cult of personality the key factor in his control of the Soviet Union between 1929 and 1941 ? (22 mks). Ans. (1) In 1936, Stalin judged the time ripe for drafting a new constitution which would preserve his autocratic power in the country. It was adopted by popular vote the following year and went into effect on January 1st 1938. Main features of the Constitution According to the Constitution, Communist Russia called itself the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. There were 11 republics, representing the different racial groups and possessing limited powers over their own affairs. Of these the Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic was the largest and the dominant one. On paper, the 1936 Constitution had all the democratic features of the Western European parliamentary governments. It provided for universal suffrage for every man and woman aged 18 or over. They voted by secret ballot. They had the right to vote for the various soviets, high and low, including the Soviet of the Union. For the whole country, the highest organ of state power was the Supreme Soviet : 1. ...read more.


His skilful use of youth organisations eg Morozov and education, the media and the arts and popular culture made him a star throughout the whole country. The 1930s saw a drastic reduction in creative freedom. This was in line with a general suspicion by the state of all independent lines of thought. Creativity had to serve the immediate needs of the government - 'Partiinost' (Party Spirit). Socialist Realism replaced the abstract experimental work of the 1920s with stereotypical art forms designed to convey immediately obvious pro-Soviet messages. Under Stalin there was some growth in popular culture. By 1940 Russia had 28,000 cinemas and stadiums were built in all the bigger towns as were parks such as Gorky Park. Books became very popular, but all the art was 'Social Realism' (whilst all archictecture was 'Stalinist Gothic' ). In order to further elevate his status the Stalin regime used art, posters and the media. Artists were forced to create works which glorified Russian achievement - 'Social Realism' art, lots of red and tractors and Stalin in the sky. Artists painted pictures glorifying Stalin and considerable effort was employed to create striking and inspiring posters and sculptures which represented Soviet Society as happy and engaged in constructive and exciting industrial work. ...read more.


the personality cult of leaders, of infallible heroes. This is dangerous and detrimental. The theory of 'heroes' and the 'crowd' is not a Bolshevik, but a Social-Revolutionary (ie. Anarchist) theory. I suggest we burn this book'. (J.V. Stalin. 'Works' Vol 13, 1955). Such facts would indicate that the 'cult of personality' around Stalin was not built up by Stalin - but by revisionists and concealed revisionists like Karl Radek (1885-1939) and Nikita Kruschev and was probably against Stalin`s wishes. The German writer Lion Feuchtwanger (1884-1958) in 1936 confirms that Stalin suspected that the 'cult of personality' was being fostered by 'wreckers' with the aim of discrediting him. 'It is manifestly irksome to Stalin to be worshipped as he is, and from time to time he makes fun of it. Of all the men I know who have power, Stalin is the most unpretentious. I spoke frankly to him about the vulgar and excessive cult made of him, and he replied with equal candour. He thinks it is impossible even that 'wreckers' may be behind it in an attempt to discredit him'. (Feuchtwanger. Moscow 1937). Hence we need to be cautious in concluding that Stalin`s cult of personality was the key factor in his control of the Soviet Union between 1929-41 - particularly in light of evidence which appears to contradict the stereotyped view portraying Stalin as an egoistic dictator and which rather reveals the leader as a modest and self-effacing individual. D.McCready 20.04.03 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    Allied losses were shown at a total of 238,000 over the whole three year period. This further evidence backs up Wolfson's argument that Stalin had no right to be suspicious of his western allies as this war effort would have needed much thought and time from the west in order to claim victory.

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies?

    However, collectivisation was not as successful as industrialisation. Rather than increasing, grain production fell between 1928 and 1934, decreasing from 73.3 million tonnes to 67.7 million tonnes. Even more disastrously, levels of cattle fell from 70 million in 1928 to almost half that, less that 39 million in 1933.

  1. Stalin and Russia, 1929-41.

    Stalin wanted to modernise Russia by building more factories, developing better transport and making weapons in case of attack. Russia would need to sell surplus food abroad to pay for new machines and to employ foreign workers to train Russia's new factory workers.

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Stalin wanted the USSR to produce enough grain to feed itself, and enough surplus grain to export to other countries to maximise the amount of money flowing into the Russian economy. Problems aside however, Stalin did in fact achieve what he set out to do in respect to increasing industrial output and agricultural production.

  1. Identified within this study is the argument that whilst many of Lenin's theories and ...

    dictatorial leaders, concentrating power at the top of their parties and eagerly enforcing their own will onto as many people as possible. However, we must remember that Pipes was a member of Ronald Reagan's flagrantly anti-Soviet government and many are of the opinion that he is of a view that misses out a whole twenty years of history.

  2. To What Extent was Stalin's Personal Paranoia the Main Reason for the Purges?

    an example, not to be killed or subjected to such excruciating tortures as they were. It seems more likely that the authors of the Bukharin, Rykov and Krestinsky trial decided to change the plot so as not to link everyone to the 'Ryutin Platform'.

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    start the largest sector of the economy which was agriculture and he wanted this to assist the five year plans by providing enough food to feed the workers and providing surplus to sell to buy modern equipment to industrialise. Many historians see collectivisation as the most extreme and rapid part of Stalin's modernisation programme.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Nikolai Bukharin: Although he supported War Communism, he later supported the NEP. After Lenin?s death, he was the most influential member of the party alongside Stalin, supported Stalin?s Socialism in One Country and opposed Trotsky. Helped Stalin defeat the Left Opposition but was expelled from the party in 1937 and executed in 1938.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work