• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"What were the major factors that caused the United States to fail in the Vietnam Conflict?"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"What were the major factors that caused the United States to fail in the Vietnam Conflict?" The world observed the lethality and effectiveness of Vietnamese guerilla forces with the Vietminh capture of the French-held fortress of Dien Bien Phu in 1954. With the French defeat at Dien Bien Phu came the Geneva Accords. Vietnam was divided into a communist-controlled Northern area and a U.S.-influenced South. However, the unification elections specified in the Accords did not occur. Since the elections were not held, polarity remained and tensions increased (McNab and Wiest 93). Infiltration of North Vietnamese communist guerillas to the South increased, presenting the South with threats of communist takeover. In addition, the government recognized that only U.S. involvement would slow communist activity (McNab and Wiest 90). Therefore, the U.S. contributed arms and military advisers, only to have Vietnam fall. Major political, social, and military factors relating to war strategy, doctrine, public opinion, and leadership influenced a cascade of events to bring the U.S. defeat in Vietnam. Although guerilla warfare contributed to the U.S. defeat, the aspect that most destroyed the U.S. effort was how the American leadership conducted the war. ...read more.

Middle

The famous search-and-destroy missions were meant to solely eliminate communists from the Southern population (Kolko 102). Since the U.S. did not hold territory but operated from central bases, the VC and NVA were allowed to return to their areas. The centralized Americans were easy prey for the versatile enemy. Also, the fact that the U.S. did not hold ground made pacification of the population, which involved removing VC and preventing infiltration, difficult. The U.S. did inflict heavy casualties on the VC and NVA. However, the North did not surrender, for the casualties did not have the psychological effect that the Americans presumed they would. In addition, the ability of U.S. forces to inflict losses was greatly restrained by the enemy's ability to retreat to Cambodia and Laos (Thompson and Frizzell 42). The American leadership was reluctant to enter those countries for fear of a high-intensity conflict. In addition, VC infiltration increased in 1965, further compounding the problem (Pentagon). Some historians argue that it was not the government's inappropriate decisions that lost Vietnam, but rather the public's lack of support and trust for the conflict. The basis of this viewpoint is that if the public would have had greater support for the government, the war could have ended differently. ...read more.

Conclusion

In fact, the large commitment of U.S. forces was necessary to halt the South's losing trend at the end of 1965 (Pentagon). In the end, however, the South was not able to hold and Saigon fell. The United States failed to achieve its objectives in Vietnam. Political, military, and social problems plagued the United States during its involvement in Vietnam. Politically, the South did not have sufficient influence over its people to ensure population security and to keep communists out of the Southern population (Hunt and Schultz 87). Militarily, the U.S. did not have an appropriate strategy to counter guerilla warfare, as seen when the Americans fought a war of attrition. Socially, public support was low at home. In summary, the entity most at fault for losing in Vietnam is the United States government, for public support does not have a significant effect on government policy. The U.S. leadership was too greatly affected by dissenting public opinion. Because of fear that escalation would cause public outrage, the military waged limited war, an inappropriate strategy to counter guerilla warfare. An apocryphal quote from the Continental Congress states "a leader owes his people his judgment." In Vietnam, many failures in leadership occurred. The government failed to fully utilize its judgment, thus losing the war in Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    in self defence, and the eviction of the UN forces from the borders by the Egyptian's were all causes of this war. After the war, the USA preserved its support for Israel by not joining with those countries who called for Israel to withdraw from the land that was conquered.

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    On Apr. 12, 1861, when President Lincoln moved to reprovision the federal troops at FORT SUMTER, in Charleston Harbor, Confederate shore batteries launched a 34-hour battering of the installation, forcing its surrender. The U.S. CIVIL WAR had begun. The War between the States Lincoln moved swiftly.

  1. The railroad in the United States.

    The railroad became the pulse of industry and was considered by many the leading factor in the expansion of industry in the United States. "While the network of rails was spreading, great financial networks were also developing." Groups of once independent railroad companies were grabbed up and consolidated to form

  2. History of the United States

    Most of NEW NETHERLAND now became New York colony and its principal settlement, New Amsterdam, became the city of New York. New York colony, already multiethnic and strongly commercial in spirit, came under control of the crown in 1685. New Jersey, sparsely settled by the Dutch, Swedes, and others, was also part of this English claim.

  1. Khrushchev's Decline and Fall.

    began to take risks by bringing out novels about Soviet society as it was, not as it was ideally supposed to be currently or to become in the future. Vladimir Dudintsev's book Not by Bread Alone, for example, was sharply attacked by official spokesmen in a public discussion held in

  2. What factors have prompted democratisation in Argentina?

    The new President owed the Navy man a favour. After seizing power in the coup of December 1981, General Leopoldo Fortunato Galtieri decided that the means as to Argentina's successful, military-ruled future lay in a 'return to the sources,' a return to El Proceso, as formulated at the time of the 1976 coup.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work