• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which of the Five Reasons were the most Influential in the Bringing about Germany's Defeat in World War One?

Extracts from this document...


Which of the Five Reasons were the most Influential in the Bringing about Germany's Defeat in World War One? In my opinion it was due to the poor leadership and planning that caused Germany to loose the First World War. The breakdown of the Schlieffen plan that was supposed to be foolproof and Kaiser Weilhelms reluctantly to involve his rich friends in industry that caused them to loose the war. The failure of alternative strategies, the submarine warfare, and the final collapse of Germany's final offence were only results of previous failures. It was hardly any surprise that the Schlieffen plan failed. The plan was to surround Paris by going through Belgium in the hope that Russia would take a while to mobilise. ...read more.


By 1918 it was seen that Germany were loosing the submarine war. Then the USA declared was in April 1917, which was the final kick in Germany's teeth. After fighting for three years and then a new large and fresh army arrive it meant testing Germany's limits and making them work even harder. However the main reason that germane lost the war was the limitations of German economic mobilisation. The economy was not backing the war effort. Due to the submarine warfare and the blockades that were put on German docks, banking and exportation was badly disrupted. This meant that Germany was unable in import and export goods like oil, rubber, metal and mercury, fats and fertilisers that were essential in the manufacture of weapons and ammunition, as well as food. ...read more.


The collapse of Germany's final Offensive was inevitable from the start. In conclusion, the most influential reason in bringing about Germanys defeat was the limitations of German economic mobilisation. Despite the other factors that went wrong for Germany, with more equipment and preparation from the economy, they would have definitely have had better chances. The next factor is the failure of the Schlieffen plan and entry of the USA. Better tactics and less "interference" from other countries would have resulted in more success. However with more preparation from the economy they may have able to cope with these set backs. The collapse of Germany's final offensive probably comes next because it was the factor that actual ended the war. The finally the failure of alternatives strategies because had the first plans worked there would be no need for other strategies. Hence they would not have failed. Sara Moore 02/05/07 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    This victory was important for the Allies because they managed to stop the Germans from winning the war. This helped their confidence and lowered Germany's because they knew they could no longer win the war. All the above points played an equally important point in helping break the stalemate because the played different parts.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan cause Germany's defeat on ...

    The new system meant that the armies were coordinated, defended well against the Ludendorff Offensive and counter-attacked effectively. The introduction of America brought resources in men, ammunition and machinery (e.g. field guns and tanks) that greatly strengthened the Allies and this was telling in the counter-attack as the German lines were smashed and pushed back.

  1. Analyse and Discuss the Reasons Behind the Breakdown in the Relationship Between the United States a

    As the end of National Socialism and Japanese militarism became inevitable during the course of 1944, the war aims of the victors became settled in the minds of the probable victors. It soon became apparent that both the USSR and the USA had different end games in mind, which as

  2. How important was Haig's tactics on the Western Front in bringing an end to ...

    The Politicians in England, namely David Lloyd George began to worry about the situation in the Somme and the figures being sent through to him from more accurate and reliable sources than Haig was benefiting from. Many were calling for Haig to be replaced but Lloyd George was more hesitant.

  1. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    For them, the Mountain front had a dual purpose: to put military pressure on Christian forces especially in the central part of Mount Lebanon, to prevent an assault on the Tal-Za'tar camp, and to mobilise Arab and international support for PLO-Leftist forces.

  2. To what extent did the failure of the Schlieffen Plan lead to Germany's defeat ...

    The Eastern front was going well for Germany. At the Battle of Tannenburg the German army performed the Schlieffen plan to great effect capturing 92,000 Russian soldiers and destroying sixty percent of the Russian army. The offensive ended at the Masurian Lakes where the Russians withdrew without a fight.

  1. Why did Germany loose the war in 1918?

    After 3 years of trench warfare Germany was almost totally drained of money, food and good morale. The people of Germany were tired hungry and unemployed while the Kaiser was ignorantly oblivious to Germany's chaos. An event at the ports in Kiel sparked off a chain of revolts and communist rebellions that in effect ended the Kaisers rule in Germany.

  2. What was the Contribution of Britain to the Defeat of Germany in the First ...

    The tank was very basic but effective as they had a high psychological effect on the Germans as they were highly frightened by it. Even though they had the tank the BEF suffered a lose of 20,000 deaths on the first day of attack.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work