• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin? Lenin and Stalin both had a considerable effect on the future of Russia. Lenin had the greater impact on Russia politically compared to Stalin as he created the world's first communist government and lead the October Revolution. However, Stalin achieved the greater economic impact on Russia such as his policies of collectivization and industrialization, which vastly improved the Russian economy compared to Lenin making it difficult to ensure that one had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people. Lenin's impact on Russia and her people was far greater compared to Stalin. Lenin masterminded and led the October revolution and Lenin created the first communist government in the world- a feat itself. Lenin was the creator of the world's first communist government and Stalin was the developer. Stalin simply built on the foundations that Lenin already had created for him. The October revolution in turn, overthrew the provisional government. It was because of Lenin that they stayed outside the provisional government that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power. By doing this, Lenin had eliminated a part of Russia's problems- the provisional government tried to carry on the war, but the elimination of the provisional government in turn saw the end of the war, improving Russia's living conditions and stopped inflation from occurring at that time. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin abandoned his policy of war communism and introduced a New Economic Policy (NEP). Peasants were allowed to sell surplus goods for profit and would pay tax rather than give some produce up for the government. The impact economically was that Russia's cattle, electricity, coal and steel production increased. Lenin won some favour among the Russian workers as peasants did not need to give their produce to the government again and they were allowed to earn extra money by selling surplus goods. A communist government brought the banning of privatisation, every main factory and workplace was in the hands of the government, and so all produce was sold and exported abroad, improving the economy of Russia. On the 12th of November, Lenin limited the workers' hours to 8 hours and rules were made about holidays and overtime, improving working conditions in Russia and made the economy more efficient. On the 8th of November, land belonging to the Tsar, church and nobles was handed over to the peasants, making previously unused land now usable, created new jobs for the unemployed, and improved the economy of Russia. Stalin had successfully built Russia into an industrialised country, to even compete with the likes of America and Germany. Lenin can be less important when he introduced the failed policy of war communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

In both cases, if both Lenin and Stalin's achievements were to be compared, similarities between the two would appear. Examples being that they both created new constituent assemblies of Russia, they both created new economic policies and improved the economy and living and working conditions in Russia. worshippers They also however, led the nation under fear, both created secret police forces to unfairly dismiss their opponents, they made the country a communist party state, both of their ways of ruling over Russia were harsh and under both Stalin and Lenin there was a large magnitude of deaths between them, and two groups of people were discriminated against- the Kulaks and the of Islam. Lenin can be more important as he created the first communist party state in Russia, and created the first NEP in Russia. However he can be less important as during his control in Russia created a civil war. Stalin can be important as he greatly changed the Russian economy and living and working conditions, to this extent, the impact was greater than Lenin, but caused a famine in the process of collectivization. But Stalin inherited a one party state, making him less important as he did not create a one party state, but Lenin didn't do much to improve the economy of Russia. One can conclude that Lenin achieved more in the political terms of Russia than Stalin but Stalin achieved more economically, thus both Stalin and Lenin contributed to Russia equally. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Both also of increased censorship and government control over universities. Stalin also enforced totalitarianism in all areas of life such as "education, youth movements, culture, media, information, armed forced, government and administration"33. This lead to a period known as Socialist Realism, an artistic style depicting happy workers, which was "reminiscent of old Russian exclusiveness" 34experienced under the Tsars.

  2. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    Stalin believed that these people were deliberately having accidents to slow down the effectiveness of the 5 Year Plans. On some occasions this was the case but on others accidents really were just accidents. Finally, the Purges profoundly affected individual thought and the way people acted.

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Stalin always liked to play the role of mediator in the early phase of the revolution. He would listen to their arguments and then propose a compromise solution. In this way he came to be seen as a moderate, so not a threat.

  2. Stalin and Russia, 1929-41.

    Everywhere, the better off peasants refused to take part. They killed their horses and cows, and hid their grain. There was massive famine from 1932-3. 5 million died of hunger by 1934. 9. From 1935, the collectives showed better results with increases in the production of cotton, sugar beet and grain.

  1. Role of Women Under Stalin

    Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1989. Origin: The origin of this source is a book by Mary Buckley, titled Women and Ideology in the Soviet Union. It was published in 1989 in Michigan, by the University of Michigan Press. Purpose: The purpose of this source is to be a reference on women in the Soviet Union under various leaders.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    When Lenin died, Trotsky was the obvious successor of Lenin, he had been a military organiser of the Bolshevik revolution, he had been a commissar of war and was in charge of the red army, he was a brilliant tactician and a loyal Bolshevik.

  1. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Lenin was not the faultless figure his supporters make him out to be. He did not just 'ditch common decency'2, he was a cruel man who would not tolerate dissent; his attack on 'factionalism' to stop animosity in the party was hypocritical considering that he was responsible for the Russian

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The only other possible way of getting food was through the illegal Black Market.In the countryside there was adesperate need of getting food for the workers, since the peasants were unwilling to sell their grain for money which had no value.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work