• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin? Lenin and Stalin both had a considerable effect on the future of Russia. Lenin had the greater impact on Russia politically compared to Stalin as he created the world's first communist government and lead the October Revolution. However, Stalin achieved the greater economic impact on Russia such as his policies of collectivization and industrialization, which vastly improved the Russian economy compared to Lenin making it difficult to ensure that one had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people. Lenin's impact on Russia and her people was far greater compared to Stalin. Lenin masterminded and led the October revolution and Lenin created the first communist government in the world- a feat itself. Lenin was the creator of the world's first communist government and Stalin was the developer. Stalin simply built on the foundations that Lenin already had created for him. The October revolution in turn, overthrew the provisional government. It was because of Lenin that they stayed outside the provisional government that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power. By doing this, Lenin had eliminated a part of Russia's problems- the provisional government tried to carry on the war, but the elimination of the provisional government in turn saw the end of the war, improving Russia's living conditions and stopped inflation from occurring at that time. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin abandoned his policy of war communism and introduced a New Economic Policy (NEP). Peasants were allowed to sell surplus goods for profit and would pay tax rather than give some produce up for the government. The impact economically was that Russia's cattle, electricity, coal and steel production increased. Lenin won some favour among the Russian workers as peasants did not need to give their produce to the government again and they were allowed to earn extra money by selling surplus goods. A communist government brought the banning of privatisation, every main factory and workplace was in the hands of the government, and so all produce was sold and exported abroad, improving the economy of Russia. On the 12th of November, Lenin limited the workers' hours to 8 hours and rules were made about holidays and overtime, improving working conditions in Russia and made the economy more efficient. On the 8th of November, land belonging to the Tsar, church and nobles was handed over to the peasants, making previously unused land now usable, created new jobs for the unemployed, and improved the economy of Russia. Stalin had successfully built Russia into an industrialised country, to even compete with the likes of America and Germany. Lenin can be less important when he introduced the failed policy of war communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

In both cases, if both Lenin and Stalin's achievements were to be compared, similarities between the two would appear. Examples being that they both created new constituent assemblies of Russia, they both created new economic policies and improved the economy and living and working conditions in Russia. worshippers They also however, led the nation under fear, both created secret police forces to unfairly dismiss their opponents, they made the country a communist party state, both of their ways of ruling over Russia were harsh and under both Stalin and Lenin there was a large magnitude of deaths between them, and two groups of people were discriminated against- the Kulaks and the of Islam. Lenin can be more important as he created the first communist party state in Russia, and created the first NEP in Russia. However he can be less important as during his control in Russia created a civil war. Stalin can be important as he greatly changed the Russian economy and living and working conditions, to this extent, the impact was greater than Lenin, but caused a famine in the process of collectivization. But Stalin inherited a one party state, making him less important as he did not create a one party state, but Lenin didn't do much to improve the economy of Russia. One can conclude that Lenin achieved more in the political terms of Russia than Stalin but Stalin achieved more economically, thus both Stalin and Lenin contributed to Russia equally. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    This idea of exclusiveness was rejected by Marxism and Leninism, meaning Stalin's portrayal of himself through the censored media allows basis to claims of him being a Red Tsar. The original literary and artistic freedom allowed by the Provisional Government following the revolution, came to a bitter end under Stalin, but had a limited revival under Khrushchev.

  2. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Those that spoke out, or just those who Stalin thought were likely to speak out, were silenced or had their stories disclaimed by the Stalinist media, always rewriting history in "the great Stalin school of falsification"4. Perhaps people just did not realise that after such a long time under a

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Stalin was the only member of the Politburo, as well as the Orgburo. * Stalin listened in to the private Kremlin telephone network and thus was well informed about what his colleagues thought. * Stalin was based in Moscow from 1921 onwards so he knew about everything that was that was going on.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    be paid to landowners, suffering for 44 years until Tsar Nicolas II cancelled this in 1905. Consequently in 1917, the peasants turned their support towards the Bolsheviks who promised land redistribution, whereas the Provisional Government had not kept their word on this issue.

  1. Role of Women Under Stalin

    8 The evidence concerning degradation of women: * "Two million German women would be raped in the coming months. Russian soldiers even raped Russian women newly liberated from Nazi camps." 9 * In response to the raping of Russian women, Stalin says "What is so awful about his having fun with a woman after such horrors?"

  2. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    Lenin's speech was about there being a Socialist revolution was very powerful: "But suddenly it became apparent that he has the ear of the man in the street, and of the man in the factory and barracks! His whole genius consists in his ability to say what these people want to say, but do not know how to say".

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Working conditions: Rationing ended in 1935, and then food prices remained stable while wages rose. Many workers still found it possible to change jobs. The Stakhanovite movement gave workers more opportunity to demand better conditions and criticise poor management. Social impact of Stalin?s policies The role and impact of Stalinist

  2. To What Extent Did Stalin Successfully Socialise Russian Society?

    Under Stalin education and the role of youth within Russian society were subject to massive change, education was free and compulsory being closely regulated by the state and monitored by the secret police who ensured communist ideology was taught. Education was at the heart of Stalin?s goal of creating a new society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work