• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people- Lenin or Stalin? Lenin and Stalin both had a considerable effect on the future of Russia. Lenin had the greater impact on Russia politically compared to Stalin as he created the world's first communist government and lead the October Revolution. However, Stalin achieved the greater economic impact on Russia such as his policies of collectivization and industrialization, which vastly improved the Russian economy compared to Lenin making it difficult to ensure that one had the greater impact on Russia and the Russian people. Lenin's impact on Russia and her people was far greater compared to Stalin. Lenin masterminded and led the October revolution and Lenin created the first communist government in the world- a feat itself. Lenin was the creator of the world's first communist government and Stalin was the developer. Stalin simply built on the foundations that Lenin already had created for him. The October revolution in turn, overthrew the provisional government. It was because of Lenin that they stayed outside the provisional government that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power. By doing this, Lenin had eliminated a part of Russia's problems- the provisional government tried to carry on the war, but the elimination of the provisional government in turn saw the end of the war, improving Russia's living conditions and stopped inflation from occurring at that time. ...read more.

Middle

Lenin abandoned his policy of war communism and introduced a New Economic Policy (NEP). Peasants were allowed to sell surplus goods for profit and would pay tax rather than give some produce up for the government. The impact economically was that Russia's cattle, electricity, coal and steel production increased. Lenin won some favour among the Russian workers as peasants did not need to give their produce to the government again and they were allowed to earn extra money by selling surplus goods. A communist government brought the banning of privatisation, every main factory and workplace was in the hands of the government, and so all produce was sold and exported abroad, improving the economy of Russia. On the 12th of November, Lenin limited the workers' hours to 8 hours and rules were made about holidays and overtime, improving working conditions in Russia and made the economy more efficient. On the 8th of November, land belonging to the Tsar, church and nobles was handed over to the peasants, making previously unused land now usable, created new jobs for the unemployed, and improved the economy of Russia. Stalin had successfully built Russia into an industrialised country, to even compete with the likes of America and Germany. Lenin can be less important when he introduced the failed policy of war communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

In both cases, if both Lenin and Stalin's achievements were to be compared, similarities between the two would appear. Examples being that they both created new constituent assemblies of Russia, they both created new economic policies and improved the economy and living and working conditions in Russia. worshippers They also however, led the nation under fear, both created secret police forces to unfairly dismiss their opponents, they made the country a communist party state, both of their ways of ruling over Russia were harsh and under both Stalin and Lenin there was a large magnitude of deaths between them, and two groups of people were discriminated against- the Kulaks and the of Islam. Lenin can be more important as he created the first communist party state in Russia, and created the first NEP in Russia. However he can be less important as during his control in Russia created a civil war. Stalin can be important as he greatly changed the Russian economy and living and working conditions, to this extent, the impact was greater than Lenin, but caused a famine in the process of collectivization. But Stalin inherited a one party state, making him less important as he did not create a one party state, but Lenin didn't do much to improve the economy of Russia. One can conclude that Lenin achieved more in the political terms of Russia than Stalin but Stalin achieved more economically, thus both Stalin and Lenin contributed to Russia equally. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    However George Leggett claims27 these methods were never used to the same extent by other rulers, although Lenin, and Khrushchev seem similar concerning their repression of opposition. However Stalin was set aside from other communist leaders by the killing of his own communist comrades, as Lenin would have never have

  2. Did Stalin betray the Russian Revolution?

    Those that spoke out, or just those who Stalin thought were likely to speak out, were silenced or had their stories disclaimed by the Stalinist media, always rewriting history in "the great Stalin school of falsification"4. Perhaps people just did not realise that after such a long time under a

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Stalin always liked to play the role of mediator in the early phase of the revolution. He would listen to their arguments and then propose a compromise solution. In this way he came to be seen as a moderate, so not a threat.

  2. Role of Women Under Stalin

    14 * Stalin only allowed women to enter the workplace because the Five Year plans had caused a huge increase in the demand for labor, and he thought they could use the women to "strengthen the economy at a fast rate."

  1. Hitlers Germany

    In West Germany the younger generation was becoming increasingly Americanized and radicalized, which caused acute generational conflicts and led to widespread criticism of government institutions, particularly the universities where conservatism was strongly entrenched. For better or worse, the social tensions of the 1960s prepared the way for a more open

  2. The Impact of Lenin on Russia and the Russian people

    He is now desperate to return to Russia to help shape the future of the country. He feels that with the tsars' abdication leaving a provisional government in control a revolution will be possible in Russia. When Lenin returns to Russia on 3rd April 1917 he announces what is known as the 'April Theses'.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    However, when Stalin came to power, the population of the USSR had started to show the benefits of many years dominated by Lenin: 1. Regime already on its way to making more people literate. 2. The concept of censorship was already established: before the end of 1918, all non-Bolshevik newspapers were eliminated.

  2. To What Extent Did Stalin Successfully Socialise Russian Society?

    base to change Russian social thinking as a whole to his own Socialist ideals. This was because too few Russian people were able to accept these ideas of the grandeur of Socialism when all of the promised benefits put forward by Stalin and his new Socialist Government were not in fact being delivered.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work