• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war? In many ways it can be argued that American aggression was responsible for the start of the Cold war although this is a claim much easier to make in hindsight. When analysing the way in which relations between the USA and USSR broke down after the defeat of the Nazis in Europe it is now possible to say that America was perhaps over suspicious of the spread of Communism within the Eastern bloc. Broken down into its simplest terms the Cold war can be viewed as a struggle of two economic systems; The success of one system in turn threatened the other and thus America viewed the spread of Communism as a direct threat to its prosperity which was based upon the principals of free trade. They believed that the rise of Communism in Eastern Europe was largely a Stalinist attempt to boost the economy of Russia by creating a large Soviet sphere of influence within the continent, obedient to Moscow yet historians are now able to look back upon the factors, which led America to this belief and conclude that they were in fact misinformed. In actual fact events such as the Greek communist revolt, into which Stalin had little or no input prove that Stalin's priority was first to insure the prosperity of Communism within Russia itself. In truth the success of Communism within Eastern Europe can ultimately be attributed to the fact that it was a political system which deeply suited the war torn economies in which it thrived In 1945 in Greece economic condition were awful. The country had been torn apart by war and it became a prime example of the type of central European country which could become susceptible to communist takeover. During that year Civil war broke out and many people were suspicious that Stalin had helped to stir up support for the Greek communists. ...read more.

Middle

In 1944 Stalin had marched troops into Iran but had agreed that six months after the end of the war he would remove them. The West did not recognise that oil was Stalin's one and only real motive aside from border protection for maintaining a presence in Iran or at least publicly this is the attitude they displayed. Instead they made out that it was a Stalinist attempt to expand communist ideas into Asia as a result the United States went to the United Nations to demand Stalin withdraw troops from the country. Initially Stalin ignored their demands but eventually succumbed in 1946. The West viewed this as a victory on their part; Stalin had realised that he could not do as he pleased just because he had played a major part in winning the war, the threat of Communism had be extinguished but the East on the other hand saw the Iran crisis as America bullying Russia into a corner and a generally hypocritical and favouritist politics. This was because currently Iran granted oil concessions to the U.S.A and Britain but not Russia. This was most unfair because Russia was the country which most definitely needed the oil the most and arguably deserved it the most too. The crisis, the end of the lend-lease agreement and rejection of reparations to Russia by the West had the cumulative effective of convincing Stalin that the U.S. was set upon the economic destruction of the Soviet Union. It became one of the factors that led to Truman prompting Kennan for his 'Long telegram' and sparked the wave of Anti-Sovietism that permeated the American media. U.S. paper Newsweek in a September 1946 addition lead with the headline, "The Soviet government has made up its mind that Capitalism must be destroyed if Communism is to survive" The battle lines were now well and truly beginning to be drawn between the two superpowers. ...read more.

Conclusion

And, given this, is it possible to argue that had neither side possessed nuclear weapons there would have been less self-restraint exercised by Stalin and Truman instead leading to the possibility of real and 'Hot' war which could potentially have had been far more disastrous implications that what in reality actually happened? In conclusion therefore, it is impossible come to any solid judgement as to when the Cold War actually began and further more who should hold responsibility for its beginnings. A historian must instead try to attach relative significance to each important event which occurred during the early Cold war period and attempt to infer in what ways each was significant to the conflict as a whole. In my opinion Truman's decisions to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were highly important events which shaped the nature of the conflict to come. When in 1949 Stalin responded by developing his own nuclear arsenal this was also highly significant as it removed President Truman from his military high ground and left both sides careful where they trod politically. Ultimately though responsibility for the start of the 'Cold war' conflict has to be laid at the feet of the Americans. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both acts of extreme aggression not just upon the Japanese but against the entire world - they sent out the message 'Don't mess with America or you'll live to regret it.' In a world already in a fragile state after two world wars in quick succession the U.S. was far too aggressive in it's immediate post-war foreign policies towards East Europe and the Soviet Union and showed no sympathy or willingness to allow this war-torn area to recover economically in a way which suited it. The incentive of increased American economic growth proved to be too great for Truman and his administration and although they were right to be weary of Stalin they took things too far and perhaps had ulterior motives in shielding European countries from communist regime change. ?? ?? ?? ?? Richard Overington 30/04/2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    all of whom were committed to anti-Jewish campaigning. These figures clearly show that there was indeed no shortage of volunteers. In addition, ordinary Germans were seen as implicated in various stages of Jewish persecution-for example, their role in Kristallnacht. Although orchestrated by party activists (in particular the SA), ordinary Germans

  2. How far were White weaknesses responsible for Red success in Russian Civil War?

    It may be argued that, initially, in 1919, the Whites experienced success, as they surrounded the Reds in Petrograd and Moscow in October and had more convinced foreign support and encouragement, especially from the Czechoslovak Legion which occupied towns along the Trans-Siberian Railway.

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    It may be argued that the coup helped the US government pass the Marshall Plan as Soviet attitudes proved to be provocative and aggressive. Other countries such as Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria followed similar patterns of "liberation", with the net result of puppet governments that were loyal to the USSR being set up.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    o Elections for the US Congress were only 3 weeks away. o If the USA did not respond strongly to a threat in its own backyard, the USSR would certainly be encouraged to challenge American power elsewhere in the world e.g.

  1. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    Berlin was promised to the USSR as part of the eastern half of Germany upon its surrender and Russia agreed to join the war against Japan when the war in Europe was over. Roosevelt was harshly criticized and was said to have 'given away' Eastern Europe.

  2. Why did the Cold War start

    Yalta Conference were not held, and adopted a new foreign policy of containment to keep communism within the areas where it was already in affect. Matters were made worse by the fact that within the regions of Soviet Control, soviet armed forces made it difficult for non-communist parties to gain political influence as opposition leaders were exiled, executed, or imprisoned.

  1. What were the Main Causes of the Cold War? and Which of these Causes ...

    the Cold War as Russia was technologically much weaker and so was unable to properly threaten the U.S and become a serious rival and enemy. After the Truman Doctrine in which he said that he would contest communism whenever it expanded into free lands and when he tackled the subject of Berlin (with the Berlin Airlift and Marshall Aid)

  2. How far was Truman personally responsible for the development of the Cold War?

    were perceived in Moscow as threatening and proved to be a self-fulfilling prophecy for the USSR. The reaction of the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Plan, led to the Soviet version in 1947: Cominform - where Stalin convinced communist countries not to take any aid from the West, as in due time, they would be victorious against them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work