• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

c) The Following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken: New technology like the tank, The American entry into the war, The blockading of German ports, The German offensive in March 1918. Explain how far you agree with this statement. All of the reasons suggested above do play a part in why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken. New technology was very important for the reason in which the stalemate on the western front was broken. The tank, which was introduced in 1916 into the war, was not a success at first but made a vital impact in a couple of battles, they proved decisive. ...read more.

Middle

I think that the American entry into the war was a large factor into the stalemate ending. With America brought men, ammunitions and confidence. They made the war a world war and fort with spite. Many American men died during World War One. With the Americans joining the war, it demoralised the German army. With many more men and munitions now on the Allies side it was thought that the war would be over in a matter of weeks but it dragged on for another year. The blockading of German ports I think was the biggest factor in the stalemate being broken on the Western front. ...read more.

Conclusion

Soon after this, the German military Surrendered. In March 1918, the German army tried a last ditch attempt at trying to counter attack the Allies, this nearly worked as they gained a lot of ground until they were stopped. This was called operation Michael. But the Allies pushed the Germans back. By September 1918, Germany had been pushed back behind the Hindenburg line. During this time people back in Germany were dying of the influenza outbreak. So in all I think that the Americans joining the war was the biggest factor. I think that the spring offensive is the least likely factor into why the stalemate was broken. But all these factors as I stated at the beginning are all important reasons into why the stalemate along the Western Front was broken. Tom Culling ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why the stalemate on the western front was finally broken.

    This obviously helped break the stalemate as it made attacking the opposition much easier as using aircraft enabled them to see what was going on down below which could order the tanks to. With the use of a machine gun, you could literally wipe out dozens of people at a time.

  2. Why Was Stalemate Broken in 1918?

    The volume of U-boat attacks increased, so the blockades were stepped up and mines were laid around the German ports. Not only was this starving the German population and causing unrest, it also meant that the German troops did not have ready access to supplies.

  1. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front

    resulted in digging trenches as what started to be "The First Battle Of Ypres". As these trenches were dug soldiers believed that they would only be in them for a matter of weeks but in fact they spent nearly 3 and a half years in them fighting and not really achieving anything or making any outstanding breakthroughs.

  2. Why did a stalemate occur on the Western Front?

    its strength and speed and altered the balance of the attack (Germans fought an unplanned offensive attack in Liege, with a large number of soldier, which caused a bottleneck and slowed the advance).

  1. The following were equally important reasons why thestalemate on the western front was finally ...

    These tanks, however, were too slow and had too short an operating range to exploit the breakthrough. In consequence, demand grew for a lighter, faster type of tank, and in 1918 the 14-ton Medium A appeared with a speed of 8 miles per hour and a range of 80 miles.

  2. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the western front was ...

    There had also been developments in 1918. The Anglo - American new Mark 8 Tanks could carry a total of 208 shells, and 13,000 bullets. Also Aircraft had been improved. By the end of the war the RFC, The Royal Flying Corps - before the RAF, had developed long range bombers.

  1. Important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken.

    They weren't very useful but were there as a morale builder for the troops. In fact all the new technology did, on its own, was extend the stalemate as both sides fought each other with the same newer and better weapons.

  2. Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front?

    Germany would then be ready to fight Russia by the time the Russian army was fully mobilised. B) Why did a stalemate develop on the Western Front? The stalemate on the Western front developed for many reasons. Germany's expectations of Belgium were seriously underestimated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work