• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Charles V unable to prevent the spread of protestantism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess why Charles V was unable to prevent the spread of the Reformation in Germany Charles V was a devout Catholic and it was his responsibility as Holy Roman Empire to stop heresy in his lands. Despite using a variety of means in attempt to stop the spread of Protestantism, he was ultimately unsuccessful in preventing the Reformation in Germany. There are several causes of his failure; notably he was away from Germany for much of his reign, however it is also significant that his power in Germany was limited and he received little help from the princes or church. The failures of his brother Ferdinand can also be seen as contributing to his overall failure. Charles' position as an absentee emperor was a significant reason for his inability to prevent the Reformation. Charles was only present in Germany for 8 out of 36 years of his reign, meaning that he was away for periods where Lutheranism was growing and gaining the most support. Arguably if Charles had been more committed to stopping Martin Luther he would have been able to prevent his gain in support; he initially did not see Luther as a threat to the Catholic Church and dismissed his idea of a reformation as simply an argument between monks. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in a further increase in Protestantism. In 1555 Ferdinand, as Charles' representative, signed the Peace of Augsburg, a treaty which gave Lutheranism official status within the Holy Roman Empire. Despite this, the role of Ferdinand in Charles' failure was arguably unessential as it is likely that Protestantism would have continued even without legal recognition, this was evident in the continuation of branches of Protestantism such as Calvinism and Anabaptism which were illegal by terms of the Peace of Augsburg. The lack of support and assistance Charles received elsewhere therefore needs to be considered. It could therefore be argued that the lack of support from the territorial princes was a more significant contribution to Charles' failure. Initially, they objected to Edict of Worms declaring Luther an outlaw until a general council had been called to reform 102 gravamena with the church. Moreover, the princes were an important source of support for Luther, especially after a great loss of peasant support after the 1524 Peasants' Revolt. Those who converted to Lutheranism were a threat to Charles as they had various successes with the Schmalkaldic League to further the spread of Protestantism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alternatively, Charles may not have required support from elsewhere if he possessed greater power in Germany. Although Charles was able to propose laws, no means existed to ensure that these laws were enforced as there was no police force. In addition to this the Capitulation that he signed in 1519 upon becoming Holy Roman Emperor limited his power in that he was unable to bring foreign troops into Germany. This lack of power caused Charles to rely on the church and the princes, therefore was an important underlying cause for his lack of success in preventing the Reformation. In conclusion, a combination of factors were necessary for Charles failure to stop the Reformation. Factors that were outside of Charles' control were a more significant cause of this failure, as he was unable to stop the Reformation alone due to the limits of his power and existence of concerns elsewhere in his empire. It cannot fully be attributed to a lack of effort on Charles' part as his successes in the Schmalkaldic wars proved that he would have been capable of preventing Protestantism if it were not for a lack of cooperation from elsewhere. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Extended Essay: Bismarck and The Unification of Germany

    5 star(s)

    In 1868, a revolution in Spain led to a search for a new ruler. A distant relative of the Spanish royal family was found, Leopold of Hohenzollern. However Leopold was a Prussian. France was very worried as future conflicts may leave her surrounded by Prussians.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How important were the events at Mnster 1534-5 in causing the failure of the ...

    4 star(s)

    This was the view of many at the time and although was not correct, the Radical Reformation, from that point on would receive great opposition. Another example would be M�nzer and the Zwickau Prophets, "Thomas M�nzer...combined a mystical, spiritualist approach to faith with a radical activist streak, which turned him into a genuine revolutionary thinker" - Johnston and Scribner.

  1. Could The Division Of Germany Been Avoided In 1949?

    off if there would be another Meeting to discuss the future of Germany; the meeting of the Council foreign ministers in Paris. The issues were not resolved, but the Blockade was lifted. This shows that to get power, Stalin did want to use force that maybe the USA was just acting in defence.

  2. How important was the role of the princes in bringing about the success of ...

    Charles had always wanted to compromise with Luther as he didn't want any more conflict and we can see this with the Diet of Augsburg where he wanted to find some common ground between protestant and catholic people. Charles had never meant to aid the success of the Lutheran Reformation

  1. Free essay

    Why was Martin Luther so popular by 1521?

    As with the peasants, the majority were content with many aspects of the church. Much of what Luther argued against was popular even amongst the elite; Elector Frederick the Wise of Saxony was an avid collector of religious relics, the value of which as means of avoiding purgatory was greatly disputed by Luther.

  2. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    There were minor setbacks as the provisional government suspected Lenin to be a German spy soon after the riots, with many leading Bolsheviks being arrested and their paper, the "Pravda" being shut-down for a short while. These problems showed no issue to Lenin, as the Bolsheviks doubled their efforts, taking advantage of further instability and faith in the provisional government.

  1. The Roman Catholic Church was becoming increasingly unpopular in the Holy Roman Empire before ...

    Priests began to have a greater sway over people as they were considered to be able to purge sins from a person. If the local priest set a bad example, this would cause further unsettlement amongst the public as they question whether the priest is truly their deliverer from death and suffering.

  2. Why was Luther able to challenge the Catholic Church so successfully in the years ...

    Luther?s determination also relates to why his ideas proved popular, he had the power to make people believe and support him. This determination meant he was the catalyst for the reformation in Europe. He not only believed there was corruption in the Catholic Church, but spoke out publicly about his ideas that salvation would be found through faith alone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work