• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Charles V unable to prevent the spread of protestantism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess why Charles V was unable to prevent the spread of the Reformation in Germany Charles V was a devout Catholic and it was his responsibility as Holy Roman Empire to stop heresy in his lands. Despite using a variety of means in attempt to stop the spread of Protestantism, he was ultimately unsuccessful in preventing the Reformation in Germany. There are several causes of his failure; notably he was away from Germany for much of his reign, however it is also significant that his power in Germany was limited and he received little help from the princes or church. The failures of his brother Ferdinand can also be seen as contributing to his overall failure. Charles' position as an absentee emperor was a significant reason for his inability to prevent the Reformation. Charles was only present in Germany for 8 out of 36 years of his reign, meaning that he was away for periods where Lutheranism was growing and gaining the most support. Arguably if Charles had been more committed to stopping Martin Luther he would have been able to prevent his gain in support; he initially did not see Luther as a threat to the Catholic Church and dismissed his idea of a reformation as simply an argument between monks. ...read more.

Middle

This resulted in a further increase in Protestantism. In 1555 Ferdinand, as Charles' representative, signed the Peace of Augsburg, a treaty which gave Lutheranism official status within the Holy Roman Empire. Despite this, the role of Ferdinand in Charles' failure was arguably unessential as it is likely that Protestantism would have continued even without legal recognition, this was evident in the continuation of branches of Protestantism such as Calvinism and Anabaptism which were illegal by terms of the Peace of Augsburg. The lack of support and assistance Charles received elsewhere therefore needs to be considered. It could therefore be argued that the lack of support from the territorial princes was a more significant contribution to Charles' failure. Initially, they objected to Edict of Worms declaring Luther an outlaw until a general council had been called to reform 102 gravamena with the church. Moreover, the princes were an important source of support for Luther, especially after a great loss of peasant support after the 1524 Peasants' Revolt. Those who converted to Lutheranism were a threat to Charles as they had various successes with the Schmalkaldic League to further the spread of Protestantism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Alternatively, Charles may not have required support from elsewhere if he possessed greater power in Germany. Although Charles was able to propose laws, no means existed to ensure that these laws were enforced as there was no police force. In addition to this the Capitulation that he signed in 1519 upon becoming Holy Roman Emperor limited his power in that he was unable to bring foreign troops into Germany. This lack of power caused Charles to rely on the church and the princes, therefore was an important underlying cause for his lack of success in preventing the Reformation. In conclusion, a combination of factors were necessary for Charles failure to stop the Reformation. Factors that were outside of Charles' control were a more significant cause of this failure, as he was unable to stop the Reformation alone due to the limits of his power and existence of concerns elsewhere in his empire. It cannot fully be attributed to a lack of effort on Charles' part as his successes in the Schmalkaldic wars proved that he would have been capable of preventing Protestantism if it were not for a lack of cooperation from elsewhere. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Extended Essay: Bismarck and The Unification of Germany

    5 star(s)

    In 1868, a revolution in Spain led to a search for a new ruler. A distant relative of the Spanish royal family was found, Leopold of Hohenzollern. However Leopold was a Prussian. France was very worried as future conflicts may leave her surrounded by Prussians.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How important were the events at Mnster 1534-5 in causing the failure of the ...

    4 star(s)

    Another branch of extremism going into a town, Wittenberg, and preaching apocalyptic messages that the world would end. This was one of the causes of the Peasants' Revolt of 1525 and all because of a few people going in with extreme views and giving the rest of the people a bad name.

  1. How far was personal gain the motivation for Imperial Princes to join Luthers Reformation? ...

    Imperial princes were likely to have had some kind of education, and so would have been able to read Luther's works such as "To the Nobility of the German Nation", which questions the power of the Church and the Papacy, or "On the Freedom of the Christian Man", which sets

  2. How important was the role of the princes in bringing about the success of ...

    including John, swooped in and introduced Lutheranism to the people who quickly accepted it. Possibly one of the most important roles John undertook was leading the Schmalkaldic League which proved very important to the Lutheran cause with its armed forces.

  1. How and why did the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917?

    This would have been seen as without purpose, but it allowed Kornilov to march against Petrograd or Moscow. Kerensky and Kornilov discussed the problems - where Kornilov said he wanted all of the Soviet revolutionaries killed and power for himself - however, acting "in the good of Russia".

  2. Cities were the main driving force of the Reformation in Germany(TM) " explain whether ...

    For example the 'Priesthood of all Believers' appealed amongst the peasants whereas the criticisms of papal taxation attracted Germans. By making his ideas appeal to both ends of the population spectrum, Luther was able to gain a larger audience as possible.

  1. The Roman Catholic Church was becoming increasingly unpopular in the Holy Roman Empire before ...

    They were no longer the ?only? religion and the ?only? culture. The Church?s failings seem more and more substantial, especially compared with religions in other cultures. Many began to doubt whether Catholicism is the ?true? religion. These two factors combined together caused the populace to become more and more anxious about the Church.

  2. Why was Luther able to challenge the Catholic Church so successfully in the years ...

    These secular, humanist ideas believed that the Church should not rule civic matter but only give guidance in spiritual matters, which Luther also emphasised in his teachings. In other words, he agreed with the Renaissance way of thinking, focusing on the present, and seeing that change was desperately needed in the Catholic Church.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work