• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was Lenin able to become the ruler of Russia in October 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Why was Lenin able to become the ruler of Russia in October 1917? Lenin's success in 1917 was a result of an ingenious juxtaposition of his intellectual guidance over the Bolshevik party and good seizure of political opportunism. The question is a twofold one that asks why first it was the Bolsheviks that prevailed in 1917 and second it was Lenin that successfully assumed leadership. This essay will examine the causes of both and look at how Lenin used their own advantage and the disadvantage of their rivalries to achieve their position in 1917. The power of Lenin and his party manifested in 1917 was accumulated gradually before the year 1917. This period was critical for the formation of Lenin's opinions and revisions on Marxism, his prospect of Russia's future and his transformation of the RSDLP party. ...read more.


This was the preliminary condition for Bolsheviks' success in 1917. The wise strategic plan of Bolsheviks in the years 1917 was key to their success. Lenin had an accurate and sympathetic grasp of the peasants' and workers' anticipation, and in response to this proposed the April thesis that promised to fulfill their demand for bread, land and peace. This won them support over the alternative government. He was wise in his appreciation of the talents of his colleagues, prominently Trotsky. This helped the Bolsheviks to always maneouvre in the correct direction. It was a clever move of the Bolsheviks to collect armory from Kerensky and turn it into their own advantage. This was key to their success because it put them into equal position with the rival government at the time, and further undermined the strength of the provisional government. ...read more.


The depression Russia's defeat caused was the most imperative factor in drawing all classes of the society, peasants, workers, students, soldiers, intellectuals into the revolution to offer support for the Bolsheviks. The incompetence of the provisional government was also important. Their insistence on continuing the war and inability to provide economic stability discredited them among the population. This made Bolsheviks' promises more appealing. The internal division between the leaders of the provisional government was also instrumental for the Bolsheviks. The Kornilov affair manifested the mutual distrust between political and military leaders in the provisional government. Their weakness created a power vacuum in the time of 1917 that was potentially available to the Bolsheviks. This vacuum was well exploited by Lenin and Trotsky. To sum up, the Bolsheviks' success in 1917 was dependent on both their own wisdom, determination and ambition and the lack of these features on their rivals' side. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    He had been forced to leave because of news of a plot, led by the royalist Malet, against him. Malet tried to set up a provisional government before he was dealt with. 10. As the French regained order in retreat, only 25,000 of the Grande Armee had survived.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    How did education change during the 1930s? * There was a huge expansion of education both to meet the needs of the Five Year Plans and to help create new communist citizens. * The Revolutionary educational theories and ideas introduced after the Revolution were quietly put to one side as discipline, exams, uniforms and such like were reintroduced.

  1. How important was Lenin to the success of the October 1917 Revolution?

    many supporters in the revolution and so ultimately gave them the upper hand against the Provisional Government. However, I do not think that he was so important as to say that without him there would not have been a revolution as there were many other factors involved, such as the

  2. Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917

    The Provisional Government's failed policies stemmed from its weak, fragmented coalition. The Octoberists were on the centre right as they agreed with the Tsar's October Manifesto, which had ended the 1905 Revolution. The Cadets (Constitutional Democrats) were the moderate, liberals of the centre of the political spectrum.

  1. How the Bolsheviks were able to seize control of Russia in October 1917

    share his power with a democratically elected parliament which was known as a Duma. Another group was the Social Revolutionaries known as the SR's they were peasants who wanted to overthrow the Czar, the church and the nobles. They also wanted land to be handed over to the peasants in order to create a communist society.

  2. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    to become discredited in the eyes of the masses who saw them as tools of the conservative classes.?11 Lenin had a similar view, asserting that the ?capitalists gleefully rubbed their hands at having found helpers against the people in the persons of the ?leaders of the Soviets (Mensheviks)??12 (see source 4).

  1. The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the ...

    The organisation in the Bolshevik party was clearly shown when membership grew to 2 million in 3 months. Unlike the Provisional Government, the Bolsheviks had a system, a central committee sent orders to the soviets, who gave orders to the factories and the Bolsheviks demanded total obedience from their members,

  2. Stalinism and the transformation of Russia.

    Unprepared to blame his poor implementation of collectivisation, Stalin instead blamed the failure of his ideology on the existence of anti-revolutionary peasants, these were the Kulaks and richer peasants. An estimated seven million people died due to famine from 1930-33.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work