• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Women at work in World War 2.

Extracts from this document...


Women at work in World War 2 Women in world war two carried out various types of work. These ranged from being fire wardens and working in munitions factories up and down the country, to conducting trains. Women found it difficult to obtain work as they faced some major obstacles. Thousands wanted to work but they faced low wages, insufficient day nurseries and inadequate transport amongst others. To combat this, state-run nurseries were set up, job sharing between women was introduced and they were given better conditions of work in the factories, to encourage them to take up the many jobs the men had left behind. Source F suggests that the women's role in the war be much the same as that before the war. They were expected to still take care of the home and provide a meal when their husbands returned from work. However, they were expected by many to provide a service to their country to the best of their ability and still do the same jobs they had before the war. Attitude in society had not changed towards women. They had to prove they could do what the men were capable of. ...read more.


This is because it is by a national newspaper, which reports on topics of interest to the whole country. The paper would normally have a fairly impartial view as they were not working for the government. In this case though, censorship would most certainly have been in place to prevent the newspapers from reporting stories which would harm the government or that they felt could create chaos. The newspaper in question feels that the contribution that the women have made is 'magnificent' and that they are the significant people in the war effort by doing jobs not expected of them and the way they applied themselves. Source D is not particularly reliable, even if true. It is a quote from the deputy Prime Minister which would mean it cannot be taken at face value. Clement Atlee would have made the statement to reassure the country and the women that they were doing a fine job. He would not be expected to say anything other than this due to his position. The source would certainly be looked upon as biased due to its origin. Both of the sources have a similar point. They both praise the women highly for their contribution and efforts and claim that they are working far harder and doing more skilled jobs than expected of them. ...read more.


I just can't get Jim a hot meal at night". This was something all working women could relate to at the time, as it would have been familiar to them. Some all the female workers described what happened as more men returned from the forces after the war: "As the job slowed down, we were told that our services were no longer needed..." The jobs were for men who had finished their duties as the war had ended. The women had to leave for them as they were still not expected to hold down jobs, as society's opinion had not changed. If the war effort of the women had been truly valued, then they would have been able to keep the jobs they had occupied for years, or at the very least be able to apply for them along with the men. The war effort had been valued during the difficult times perhaps to prevent the women feeling that they were not being treated well enough. From reading the sources though, it would appear that the women had almost expected it to happen and just had to accept it. I do not feel that women and their contribution to the war effort was truly valued as their position in society had not changed along with attitudes towards them when the war ended and the country returned to normal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Lloyd George views have differed a lot from 1916 to 1930; this is because during the war, thing got really bad for Britain. Haig's strategy was a disaster and was getting men killed unnecessary, by the end of the war half a million were dead and millions wounded; and only 6 miles were gained.

  2. Women at War: Source work

    not have appealed to the working woman of the First World War, and was intended instead to merely record events pretty much as they were, and photographs and accounts of munitions factories show similar conditions to those depicted in the painting, a well lit and fairly pleasant atmosphere, although the machines were dangerous and explosions occurred occasionally.

  1. Vietnam Question 2

    However, the foes know the landscape very well, whereas the Americans are baffled by the landscape. This idea relates to the idea in Source D where the soldiers had walked into a trap because they did not know where they were going.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    His negotiating stance grew tenuous, however, after Lebanese leaders, who had previously expressed solidarity with the PLO, petitioned him to abandon Beirut to spare the civilian population further suffering. Arafat informed Habib of his agreement in principle to withdraw the PLO from Beirut on condition that a multinational peacekeeping force be deployed to protect the Palestinian families left behind.

  1. Australia and world war 2.

    * The first seven months after war was declared there was little fighting in Europe and the lack of action led to this period being known as the 'phoney war' * The second AIF (Australian Imperial Force) was formed in 1933 but few Australians were interested in what was happening and the rate of enlistment was slow.

  2. Vietnam source based work

    Source F is an article from an American magazine and it shows that 64% of people said that television had made them feel like backing up the boys in Vietnam. Only 24% felt opposed to the war. This article was written only two years into the war and very little had happened in Vietnam in these two years.

  1. The Home Front 1914-1918, Women and work - source related study.

    There chance came when the war occurred from the women's account it is obvious she was frustrated with domestic services as she quotes 'I hated every minute of it', this shows the enthusiasm she had to get away from her last job and was eager to do hand cutting shells.

  2. Weapons of world war 2

    The Great Sherman had reinforced 62mm armor. This tank also boasted a 75mm gun on a power turret. The Great Sherman was exceptionally maneuverable for its size, and could travel 25 mph, which was very fast for a heavy tank model. Conversely the Panzer III had 2-layer 30mm armor, and was a very maneuverable medium tank with heavy firepower.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work