• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Actus reus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Law should encourage citizens in their civil duty to "do the right thing" in a moral sense and not turn a blind eye or fail to act to help someone who is in need.' Consider to what extent the criminal law relating to commission reflects this view. Omission is when the defendant does nothing to prevent the victim's death. In certain circumstances, D may be under a duty to take positive steps to assist V, and if D fails to take those steps then he can be liable for murder or manslaughter. If D is liable for V's death, he must be under a duty to act in the circumstances, otherwise he will escape liability. This was shown in Khan and Khan, in this case D escaped liability as there was no imposition of duty of care. Duty of care can be owed in a variety of situations. One of these situations is when duty arises out of contractual liability; where failure to fulfil a contract is likely to endanger lives, the criminal law will impose a duty to act. ...read more.

Middle

S and D were liable for manslaughter convictions as they had assumed a duty of care for V, and their feeble efforts to look after her amounted to gross negligence. Duty of care can also arise out of the creation of dangerous situation. Where D creates a dangerous situation then, on becoming aware of it, he is under a duty to take steps to prevent or minimise the harm. If he fails to take such steps then he will be criminally liable for the end result. This situation arose in Miller, here D was liable for the damaged caused as he took no steps to prevent the fire from spreading. The Good Samaritan law enforced in France states that if someone is seen in a dangerous situation, you must help them, unless the situation will jeopardize your own life. D can be released from a duty that had been voluntarily undertaken or had one imposed on him, this was shown in Smith, where V had stopped D from calling a doctor when she had given birth. ...read more.

Conclusion

However there are some serious moral and practical objections to this view. One of the objections is that it is difficult to decide the definition of when it would be easy for D to attempt a rescue. Another objection is the forcing of citizens to watch out for and protect each other, even though citizens pay for highly trained professionals to do the job. Also D can misjudge the difficulty of the situation and can put himself at risk. The criminal law in France and USA encourages citizens to do the right thing by enforcing the Good Samaritan law. In the UK there is no such law and a person must only help another if there is imposition of a duty to care. If there is no imposition of duty of care, then D is not required to help V, this was shown in Khan and Khan. However there is a reform suggested but it should not be enforced as citizens already pay tax to be protected from highly trained professionals. ?? ?? ?? ?? Adrees Khan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Summary:
The essay contains a generally accurate outline of the cases relating to when an omission in criminal law can bring about liability. However, it should question whether the law should be changed, and whether the cases were correctly decided has received limited coverage.***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 04/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    This is when the defendant is guilty of wilfully and without reasonable excuse neglecting to perform his duty. A case to outline this category of omission is R v Dytham 1979, A police officer from St.Helens, witnessed the death of a night clubber out side Cindy?s nightclub but took no

  2. Human Trafficking In Australia. This essay will be covering different aspect of human ...

    It is a permanent tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. The ICC was established as a court of last resort to prosecute the most heinous offenses in cases where national courts fail to act.

  1. The law relating to the defence of insanity is out dated and unsatisfactory. Reform ...

    If automatism is pleaded successfully that is a complete defence and the defendant escapes all liability as opposed to being sent to a mental institution. Insanity overlaps with automatism, so any illness which affects the mind of the defendant automatically amounts to insanity, removing the defence of automatism completely.

  2. Problems with the Law on Theft

    This is a two part test which asks whether what the defendant did was dishonest by ordinary standards (objective), and whether the defendant realised those actions to be dishonest by those standards. These issues are left at the discretion of the jury.

  1. Outline the range of duties undertaken by lay magistrates. Comment on how well Lay ...

    However A person may be disqualified from being a lay magistrate if they have a certain job or issue, for example if there job does not let them take enough time off, or if they have recently given birth and need to be with there child, so they might not be able to sit for 26 times.

  2. The rules and principles of causation not only provide fair practical solutions to the ...

    factual cause there is no reason to use further tests as it is only likely to increase the probability of allowing the defendant to be found not guilty, and therefore leaving a crime unpunished.

  1. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    Whilst the defendant?s act was not the factual cause, he was still guilty as it was his act that placed the victim in a brain dead state, which resulted in her life support being turned off and her death. This case shows how the courts look at the root cause

  2. Assess the impact of the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the ...

    This did not violate the Article 5 as the arrest was lawful, proportionate and was not longer than necessary.(Hence individual protection are given up in the expense of the interest of wider community) It can be seen in this case that the rights are protected under the articles in the ECtHR whereas the UK courts uphold such rights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work