• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Actus reus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Law should encourage citizens in their civil duty to "do the right thing" in a moral sense and not turn a blind eye or fail to act to help someone who is in need.' Consider to what extent the criminal law relating to commission reflects this view. Omission is when the defendant does nothing to prevent the victim's death. In certain circumstances, D may be under a duty to take positive steps to assist V, and if D fails to take those steps then he can be liable for murder or manslaughter. If D is liable for V's death, he must be under a duty to act in the circumstances, otherwise he will escape liability. This was shown in Khan and Khan, in this case D escaped liability as there was no imposition of duty of care. Duty of care can be owed in a variety of situations. One of these situations is when duty arises out of contractual liability; where failure to fulfil a contract is likely to endanger lives, the criminal law will impose a duty to act. ...read more.

Middle

S and D were liable for manslaughter convictions as they had assumed a duty of care for V, and their feeble efforts to look after her amounted to gross negligence. Duty of care can also arise out of the creation of dangerous situation. Where D creates a dangerous situation then, on becoming aware of it, he is under a duty to take steps to prevent or minimise the harm. If he fails to take such steps then he will be criminally liable for the end result. This situation arose in Miller, here D was liable for the damaged caused as he took no steps to prevent the fire from spreading. The Good Samaritan law enforced in France states that if someone is seen in a dangerous situation, you must help them, unless the situation will jeopardize your own life. D can be released from a duty that had been voluntarily undertaken or had one imposed on him, this was shown in Smith, where V had stopped D from calling a doctor when she had given birth. ...read more.

Conclusion

However there are some serious moral and practical objections to this view. One of the objections is that it is difficult to decide the definition of when it would be easy for D to attempt a rescue. Another objection is the forcing of citizens to watch out for and protect each other, even though citizens pay for highly trained professionals to do the job. Also D can misjudge the difficulty of the situation and can put himself at risk. The criminal law in France and USA encourages citizens to do the right thing by enforcing the Good Samaritan law. In the UK there is no such law and a person must only help another if there is imposition of a duty to care. If there is no imposition of duty of care, then D is not required to help V, this was shown in Khan and Khan. However there is a reform suggested but it should not be enforced as citizens already pay tax to be protected from highly trained professionals. ?? ?? ?? ?? Adrees Khan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Summary:
The essay contains a generally accurate outline of the cases relating to when an omission in criminal law can bring about liability. However, it should question whether the law should be changed, and whether the cases were correctly decided has received limited coverage.***

Marked by teacher Nick Price 04/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    This is when the defendant is guilty of wilfully and without reasonable excuse neglecting to perform his duty. A case to outline this category of omission is R v Dytham 1979, A police officer from St.Helens, witnessed the death of a night clubber out side Cindy?s nightclub but took no

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    the ordinary conduct of daily life", thus incorporating a point of law from the common law into a statute. The offence of ABH has been clarified through case law, although there are still important issues that remain unresolved.

  1. Discuss whether trial by jury should be retained or abolished.

    has been associated with the legal system for years may most often have some sort of recollection to a similar case, or similar circumstances and have a degree of prejudice. However, it is argued that owing to this, judges are more emotionally detached as it is their job and see

  2. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    He was allowed the defence as Lord Milmo said "it can amount to a lawful excuse for a threat to kill if the threat is made in the prevention of crime or for self-defence, provided it is reasonable in the circumstances to make such a threat".

  1. The rules and principles of causation not only provide fair practical solutions to the ...

    factual cause there is no reason to use further tests as it is only likely to increase the probability of allowing the defendant to be found not guilty, and therefore leaving a crime unpunished.

  2. Problems with the Law on Theft

    This ruling was for policy reasons to protect those who are vulnerable. However, the major condemnation aimed at these three cases were that the prosecution had brought the wrong change and that they should have, instead, been charged with Deception offences.

  1. The regulations on arrest and detention of offenders under the Police and Criminal Act ...

    Those dangers include officers abusing their powers and harassing ethnic minorities based on stereotypical and personal prejudices that have been created and therefore, the balance between a suspects right and the police?s power is thrown into disarray as the police, if granted authority by the Home Secretary, hold significantly more power over the suspects during a time of danger.

  2. A2 Law Robbery Case Study. Discuss the criminal liability of Dave

    Secondly we look at whether force was used in order to steal. If the force was not used for the purpose of stealing then it will not be robbery. In the scenario the threat of force was used in order to get the money from the cashiers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work