• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Before 2005 there were three main problems with the appointment procedures which is the way in which judges are appointed. This was amended in the Constitution Reform Act 2005. This was amended in the constitution Reform Act 2005.

Extracts from this document...


Before 2005 there were three main problems with the appointment procedures which is the way in which judges are appointed. This was amended in the Constitution Reform Act 2005. This was amended in the constitution Reform Act 2005. The first problem of the old system was, it was dominated by politicians. The Lord Chancellor and the Prime Minister were the main people in the appointment procedure but they were politicians who could be swayed by political factors in the selection of judges. The second problem of the old appointment system was, it was too secretive. The process was handled by a small group of civil servants who, although they discussed plenty with judges and senior barristers, nevertheless had a great deal of power. It was considered unfair because it favoured people who had good contacts. This can be because of the judge's family or the schools they attended which was not the right way of making the decision, they should be focusing on the individual's strength as a future judge. The last problem with the appointment procedure was, it was discriminatory. ...read more.


Under the 2007 Act, eligibility is no longer based on the number of years candidates have had rights of audience before a court, but instead of their number of years post-qualification experience. The number of required years experience has been reduced from seven to five years and ten to seven years, depending on the seniority of the judicial office. Following the 2007 Act the Lord Chancellor has issued regulations stating that the qualification of a legal executive is sufficient for judicial appointment in the magistrate's courts and tribunals. Government lawyers are now allowed to become judges, these lawyers are employed in the Crown Prosecution Service, Serious Fraud Office and the Government Legal Service. They are able to sit as civil recorders which are part time judges and deputy district judges in the magistrates court, provided their own department is not involved in the case. This is a major development, as such lawyers have a wider range of backgrounds, with women and ethnic minorities well represented and the majority state educated. Their recruitment as junior judges will hopefully make the profession at this level more representative of society but it is not clear that there is any real justifications for not making the more senior judicial posts open to these lawyers. ...read more.


This Commission includes the President and Deputy President of the Supreme Court, as well as one member of each of the three judicial appointing bodies of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The temporary Commission will put forward two to five candidates to choose from. The Minister will then consult with the senior judges, the first Minister and deputy First Minister in Northern Ireland. The Minister will then decide on the candidate and tell the Prime Minister who will then recommend this candidate to the Queen. The Commission for Judicial Appointments has been abolished, a Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombusdsman now oversees the recruitment process and has the power to investigate individual complaints about judicial appointments. Judges are most of the time white, made and seem to be of the middle to upper class and mostly elderly leading to accusations that they are unrepresentative of, and distanced from, the majority or society. In 1985 80 percent of Lords of Appeal, Heads of Division, and Lord Justices of Appeal and High Court judges were educated at Oxford or Cambridge. Over 50 percent of the middle ranking circuit judges to Oxbridge but only 12 percent of the lower ranking distract judges. Eighty percent of judges appointed since 1997 were educated at a public school. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    It is submitted that Beatrice manifestly suffers damage as a result of MacGregor's breach of duty, and that the conditions of causation (Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969)4) and reasonable foresee ability (The Wagon Mound No.1 (1967)5)

  2. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    There is a time limit on brining an action, the claimant only has two months from the day it should have come to his attention. Actions under Article 232 can be seen as contrary to article 230. It provides that if the European parliament, the council or the commission, are

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how judges are appointed and how the courts and legal service act 1990 ...

    3 star(s)

    Firstly again, you must be a solicitor or barrister for a minimum of ten years; therefore, you must have the rights of audience. You must have also sat on the bench for a minimum period. Then you must conform to views of the particular political party elected at that time.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society.

    3 star(s)

    For example the Belmarsh Prison Case, where Home Secretary David Blunket wanted to detain suspected terrorists for three months without trial, but was unsuccessful as the judiciary believed it violated human rights.

  1. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    A majority vote was possible; a letter is often the only option open to a juror where a verdict has been reached which they did not agree with. The House of Lords took the view that, due to the secrecy of the jury, it could investigate what had happened in the jury room.

  2. The role and appointment of judges.

    He will then answer any questions or matters that might arise during the deliberations of the jury and will advise the jury when a majority verdict is acceptable. If the jury find the defendant guilty, the judge will decide on an appropriate sentence.

  1. Explain (a) the process of selecting magistrates and (b) the work that they carry ...

    People who are bankrupt. Those who are serving armed forces. Members of the police, as they could easily influence decisions. Anyone holding a job that may conflict with the role, like a traffic warden, as many cases involve traffic. Anyone with close relatives already serving on the same bench, as they are likely to have the same mindset.

  2. The Selection and Role of Juries

    Prosecution right to stand by jurors This is a right that only the prosecution can exercise. It allows the juror who has been stood by to be put to the end of the list of potential jurors so that they will not be used on the jury unless there are not enough jurors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work