• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the relationship between law and morals.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the relationship between Law and Morals. Consider how far the law seeks to uphold and promote moral values? (June 2002) Laws are legal rules backed by official state sanction and procedures. Failure to follow law results in punishment. The oxford dictionary states "a rule or a system of rules recognised by a country or community as regulating the actions of its members and enforced by the imposition of penalties." Therefore the main reason for laws is to protect individuals and their property from harm in order to preserve command in society and punish those who deserve punishment. Sir John Salmond describes law as "the body of principles recognised and applied by the state in the administration of justice." Morals on the other hand are beliefs and values which are shared by an individual or a group of people based on what is right or wrong. Moral values are normally based on the dominant religion being Christianity, as well as other sources of moral beliefs. These values lead to debates which normally consist of sexual issues and standards of behaviour. In relation to the question, law and morals assist each other. Aristotle stated that the "rule of law is better than the rule of the individual." ...read more.

Middle

He stated that "Just what people happen to believe or accept is not to be equated with correct standards of morality." He also said that "using the law to enforce moral values was unnecessary, undesirable, as morality is a matter of private judgement." Here it is evident that Professor Hart was familiar with the significance of individual autonomy as he did not want moral beliefs and values to impact upon and symbolize legal rules. Harts view was also shared by the French sociologist Durkheim who stated that "in a modern society it is very difficult to pin point a set of moral values." However in comparison, Lord Devlin rejected Professor Hart's view and stated that "morality is not simply individual judgement...society must have recognised common morality." Here it is strongly evident that Lord Devlin wanted moral values to be endorsed through law. In addition to this there seems to be a contradiction between the relationship of law and morals. This is expressed through The Sexual Offences Act which states that homosexual and heterosexual couples have the same rights. However this understanding was not fully applied in the case of R v Brown (1993), where the defendants were held liable of homosexual sado-masochistic acts even though all participants consented. ...read more.

Conclusion

Changing attitudes in society also reflect the way in which the law seeks to uphold and promote morality. This is seen in the case of R v R (1991) in which the defendant, who was living away from his wife; raped her in her parents' home which he had forcibly entered. Here Lord Keith stated that "This is not the creation of a new offence, it is the removal of a common law fiction which has become anachronistic and offensive and we consider that it is our duty having reached that conclusion to act upon it." This eliminated the ancient rule that a wife was deemed to have given her consent irrevocably once she was married. Lord Keith saw this as an example of law developing in the light of changing social and cultural advances. In conclusion it can be said that the law does indeed uphold and promote moral values in most legislation. This can be seen as whilst morals are varying overtime, so are laws; exemplifying to us that law and morals share a powerful connection. Though in most legal rules, moral values are not upheld and this is very apparent. By and large as stated by Hart, moral values and laws share a likeness, "they share a general habit of obedience within society to which they apply." ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 Pooja Sharma ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the extent to which discrimination is prohibited under English and Welsh law (25 ...

    5 star(s)

    The next is indirect discrimination which is more subtle and is where a policy or practice puts one category of people at a disadvantage unless it is a proportionate way of achieving a goal. There is also Victimisation this means treating someone worse than others because they have complained about discrimination or is helping another person bring a claim e.g.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Taking selected areas of the civil and or criminal law, evaluate whether sportsmen and ...

    4 star(s)

    damage suffered was too remote a consequence of the breach of duty. If the harm to the plaintiff would not have occurred "but for" the defendants breach of duty then that negligence is a cause of that harm as shown in Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 1969 1 QB 428.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Homicide Act 1957

    3 star(s)

    if he had not been drunk and if the answer to this was yes then they should ask whether he was actually suffering from diminished responsibility when he did so. The case of R v. Tandy stated that an alcoholic state arising from voluntary drinking did not amount to a

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate the principles governing the law on Intoxication.

    3 star(s)

    Defendant's in these types of cases are blamed to the same extent a person who intentionally commits a crime. The second type of intention in voluntary intoxication is basic intent crimes such as common law assault/battery, manslaughter, rape, 'reckless' criminal damage and Sec 47, 20, 23 of the OAPA (1861).

  1. Jenny had an argument with her boyfriend, David, which resulted in David throwing Jenny ...

    The actus reus of the offence is to inflict either a wound on the victim or Grievous Bodily Harm which according to R v Smith 1961 means really serious bodily harm. A wound is where the external layers of the skin are broken (JCC v Eisenhower).

  2. UNIT3 ASSIGNMENT4 LAW OF TORT

    He was injured and sued the defendants for damages. The defendants were occupiers for the purpose of the Act. Their defence of volenti (consent) failed since the court held that knowledge of danger was not assent. Nevertheless the plaintiff's damages were reduced by 50% in respect of his own contributory negligence.

  1. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    7eIi7miNj from 7eIi7miNj coursewrok 7eIi7miNj work 7eIi7miNj info 7eIi7miNj [5] Cunningham [1982]codd ddr seddddw ordd ddk indd fodd dd. [6] "To prove the intention, you may show the motive, and this is a link in the chain of evidence", in Heeson [1878].cofb fbr sefbfbw orfb fbk infb fofb fb; [7]

  2. British Law in Health and Social Care

    (Holdsworth, 2006) Common Law Common law forms a major part of England's law. It covers common crimes that happen on a day to day basis and have always existed such as rape, assault, murder and theft. Common law is law created and refined by judges: a decision in a currently

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work