• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this is an accurate description of the selection and role of the jury?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard.' To what extent do you think that this is an accurate description of the selection and role of the jury? A jury is a group of men and women legally chosen to hear a case and to decide the facts from the evidence presented. Juries are used in civil and criminal cases. Trial by jury is not common in civil cases is not common and is usually restricted to actions involving defamation, malicious prosecution, fraud and false imprisonment. Any part to one of these actions has the right to trial by the jury. A jury will be ordered for other cases when the court considers it necessary, which it rarely does. A county court jury consists of eight jurors and a High Court jury has 12.In criminal cases juries, juries of 12 persons are used in all trials in the Crown Court. The jury is selected at random from the electoral register to provide a cross-section of the population. ...read more.

Middle

The statement that ' Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard' is to an extent an accurate description of the selection and role of the jury by viewing the details mentioned above and also discussing its disadvantages. The first being that jurors may not be competent to understand the evidence presented and the issues involved cases involving fraud, which may last for many months, may involve the use of technical terms beyond the grasp of many jurors. In liberal cases for example an average juror may not be able to appreciate the subtle meanings of the offending words- are they statements of facts or merely comments? In addition to reaching a decision a liberal jury has to decide the amount of damages which a successful plaintiff should receive, although they have no training in this aspect and the judge is only allowed to give advice or guidance in general term. The courts, however do have power to substitute the sum awarded, if it appears to the court that the jury's award is excessive or inadequate. ...read more.

Conclusion

Following the Rosemary West murder trial in 1995, jury members were offered counseling. It is possible for a black person to be tried by a wholly white jury. There has been a move to abate this possible disadvantage by ensuring that a certain number of non-white jurors are selected for a panel, although selection for a particular case is still by ballot from total jurors on the panel. Moving on further on the other hand, to an extent it can be said that the statement is inaccurate as the general public are very keen to maintain trial by jury. Ordinary people have a part o play in the system.Professionals have to make sure that jurors who are not legally qualified understand the proceedings. The system is kept accessible to all. The use of ordinary people brings the system down to earth. A group decision by eight or twelve people possibly gives fairer results. Juries lastly have a reasonable track record for making the right decision. Considering al of the above factors I still believe that to an extent Juries are anti-democratic, irrational and haphazard in it is selection and role. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    cases (James & Raine, 1998:42), to allowing judiciary to 'engineer' racially mixed juries (Sanders & Young, 2000:565), to a reformation of committal proceedings in Magistrates' courts (Davies et al, 1998:198). Since the Commission submitted its' report to the government in 1993, some of the recommendations have been implemented, and others ignored.

  2. Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

    * Direction of polarisation related to the number of persuasive arguments \ Risky shift when risky extreme had most of arguments and visa versa. Diffusion of responsibility * The feeling of individual members of group cannot be held * No individual members can be held responsible for a group decision

  1. Description of the jury system

    These 12 jurors will then make up the jury for the duration of the trial. However, should a juror fall ill or die during the trial, and on the grounds that both the prosecution and defence agree, the trial may continue with a minimum of 10 jurors.

  2. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    Therefore, the study of subculture often consists of the study of the symbolism attached to clothing, music and other visible affectations by members of the subculture, and also the ways in which these same symbols are interpreted by members of the dominant culture.

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    The Juries Act 1974, section seventeen allows for majority verdict to be used, normally eleven to one, ten to two, ten to one or nine to one. In open court the foreman must state the number of jurors agreeing with the verdict and the numbers disagreeing with the verdict.

  2. To what extent do you consider that restriction of the availability of trial by ...

    professional judges" The point that this is making is that a jury is constituted of lay people who may understand the guilty party a little more than a judge is able to. It is understandable that a judge is a person that has seen people appear before him on similar charges repeatedly.

  1. Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown ...

    There are people that are excused of jury service have to either be aged 65-70 years old, a member of Parliament, in the armed forces, have done jury service in the last two years, or are practising members of a religious society.

  2. Explain how jurors are chosen and the role of the jury in a crown ...

    Political vetting was being checked by the police and once they were discovered a re trial was immediately ordered. The Attorney General (A.G.) is the person who decided when political vetting was allowed and his conclusions were; that it was only allowed in terrorist cases and national security issues.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work