• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Fixed point iteration: Rearrangement method explained

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Maths C3 coursework

Fixed point iteration: Rearrangement method

Another numerical method is called the rearrangement method. As the name states it requires you to rearrange the original function. From that point you can tabulate and calculate your results. Rearranging the original function is key to this otherwise you cannot repeat the number of iterations you do.

The function I will be using is: f (x) = x3+2x2-9x-11:

This image (left) shows that there are 3 roots to this equation. This can be deduced because it has 3 points of intersection with the ‘x’ axis. To find one of these roots I will use the rearrangement method. This I need to rearrange f(x) into a form so that x = g(x). To find a root with this new function I need to also have the values for y = x. image00.png

g(x) = 3√ (9x+11-2x2). The steps I followed to derive this were:

f(x) = x3 +2x2 – 9x – 11

...read more.

Middle

-0.0613

8

-3.72855

-3.69288

-0.0357

9

-3.69288

-3.67197

-0.0209

10

-3.67197

-3.65967

-0.0123

11

-3.65967

-3.65241

-0.0073

12

-3.65241

-3.64811

-0.0043

13

-3.64811

-3.64558

-0.0025

14

-3.64558

-3.64407

-0.0015

15

-3.64407

-3.64318

-0.0009

16

-3.64318

-3.64266

-0.0005

17

-3.64266

-3.64234

-0.0003

18

-3.64234

-3.64216

-0.0002

19

-3.64216

-3.64205

-0.0001

20

-3.64205

-3.64199

-0.0001

21

...read more.

Conclusion

Again the generic formula I will use is: xn+1 = g (xn)

Iterations

x

g(x)

∆x

1

-5

-9.555555556

4.5556

2

-9.55556

-77.87639079

68.3208

3

-77.8764

-51131.22153

########

4

-51131.2

-1.48525E+13

########

5

-1.5E+13

-3.64045E+38

########

6

-3.6E+38

-5.3607E+114

########

7

-5E+114

#NUM!

#NUM!

From this table I can see that ∆x iscontinually increasing. This shows that the difference between x and g(x) is getting larger. Hence the values are diverging. From this I can deduce that the root cannot be obtained with this new form of g(x). Again the magnitude of g’(x) is key. If I look at the graph I can see why there is no convergence: This shows that at the point of intersection the gradient of g(x) is greater than the gradient of y = x. since the gradient of y = x is always 1 it means that the gradient of g(x) at the point of intersection is greater than 1. This means that if I was to continue iterating with my calculations I would get diverging values: image04.pngimage05.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    General Proof - With this method, we take two points, like the other two methods. The co-ordinates of P remain the same as the increment method, but this time, Q, it is (x+h) x+h) �). Here, "h" tends to 0 and can be any value on the x axis.

  2. Numerical Method of Algebra.

    -7.1055E-06 -0.66513 1.22584E-05 -0.66512 3.16215E-05 -0.66511 5.09839E-05 Tbl DS-06: Step 6 I have stopped at Step 6, as it will get more and more numbers behind the decimal point if I continue on. However, I haven't got to an answer that I satisfy.

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    False position method: If we apply the first order of convergence principles to this method we get the following: Once again the last value isn't remotely close to a K, granted that the false position method's first order convergence has a smaller range of K than secant method did.

  2. Arctic Research (Maths Coursework)

    at an average speed of 340 km/h. This is a reasonable total time as comparing this to my calculation earlier of the time it will take for all 16 flights when ignoring the wind was 2.352. I will now alter the velocities of both the plane and the westerly wind in order to see how this affects the journey times.

  1. The Gradient Fraction

    2 3 4 y -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Graph follows on the next page This is the graph of 'y=x'. I will be finding the gradient at different points on this graph. x -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 x2 16 9

  2. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    The more decimal place the more accurate the answer of the root is. X Y -0.69 -0.050563533 -0.68 -0.029629888 -0.67 -0.009507116 -0.66 0.009848393 -0.65 0.028477721 -0.64 0.046419535 -0.63 0.063710194 -0.62 0.080383854 -0.61 0.096472572 Tbl DS-03: Step 3 X Y -0.669 -0.007537736 -0.668 -0.005575983 -0.667 -0.003621818 -0.666 -0.001675197 -0.665 0.000263921 -0.664

  1. Functions Coursework - A2 Maths

    To illustrate the fact that the root lies in the interval [1.87,1.88], part of the graph of y=f(x) is drawn. The graph crosses the x-axis visibly between x=1.87 and x=1.88. This means that between x=1 and x=2, y=f(x)=0 for a value of x in the interval [1.87,1.88] i.e.

  2. Change of sign method.

    1.0000000000 2.0000000000 1.5000000000 -1.0000000000 27.0000000000 7.3750000000 1.0000000000 1.5000000000 1.2500000000 -1.0000000000 7.3750000000 2.0156250000 1.0000000000 1.2500000000 1.1250000000 -1.0000000000 2.0156250000 0.2441406250 1.0000000000 1.1250000000 1.0625000000 -1.0000000000 0.2441406250 -0.4401855469 1.0625000000 1.1250000000 1.0937500000 -0.4401855469 0.2441406250 -0.1140441895 1.0937500000 1.1250000000 1.1093750000 -0.1140441895 0.2441406250 0.0609855652 1.0937500000 1.1093750000 1.1015625000 -0.1140441895 0.0609855652 -0.0275378227 1.1015625000 1.1093750000 1.1054687500 -0.0275378227 0.0609855652 0.0164708495 1.1015625000

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work