• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

In my coursework I will be using three equations to investigate their solutions using three numerical methods which are: change of sign using Newton-Raphson by finding the fixed point iteration fixed point iteration after rearranging the equa

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Numerical Methods

In my coursework I will be using three equations to investigate there solutions using three numerical methods which are:

  1. change of sign using
  2. Newton-Raphson by finding the fixed point iteration
  3. fixed point iteration after rearranging the equation f(x) = 0 into the form x = g(x)

Change of sign

This method involves finding an interval in which f(x) changes sign.

I am using the function f(x) = 2x³ – 5x² – 4x + 1 for this method

image00.png

I have used autograph to show the graph of y= 2x³ – 5x² – 4x + 1

Here is the table of values

-2

-27

-1

-2

0

1

1

-6

2

-11

3

-2

4

33

This shows that there are three intervals containing roots:

[–1,0], [0,1] and [3,4].

image01.pngimage12.png

It can be seen that f(-1) > 0 and f(0) < 0 so there is a root in the interval [-1,0].

Bisection

In this method the interval is successively halved by looking at the value of f(x) at its

mid-point. For the root in the interval [-1,0], you next try an x-value of-0.5.

f(-0.5) = 1.5

-0.75

0.34375

-0.875

-0.66796875

-0.8125

-0.123535156

-0.78125

0.119567871

-0.79688

0.000365464

Since this is positive the root lies in the interval [-1,-0.5]. The next value I’ll try is the midpoint of the new interval, -0.75

f(-0.75) = 0.34375

f(-0.875) =

...read more.

Middle

image22.png

f(x)= x³+6x²+4x  

f’(x)= 3x²+12x+4

Using excel I have found the roots

By using the Newton-Raphson equation

x0

-2image03.png

x1

-1

x2

-0.8

x3

-0.765217391

x4

-0.76393381

x5

-0.763932023

x6

-0.763932023

x7

-0.763932023

This is fixed point iteration

image04.png

image05.pngimage06.png

.

        I have used autograph to both draw my graphs and display

        a table of results to show where the root is

By using Newton Raphson method

image07.pngimage08.png

So for my example Xo= -2

So (-2)³+6*(-2)²+4*(-2) = 8

3*(-2)²+12*(-2)+4 = -8

Then (-2) – 8/-8 = -1

And then carrying on the principle x would be replaced with -1

by looking for a change of sign I can identify my error bounds and the sign changes between -1 and -0.5 so -1= 1 and -0.5= -0.625

so by using excel I have imputed the x values into the equation y = x³+6x²+4x  and here are the results:

        x        y

-0.5

-0.625

-0.6

-0.456

-0.7

-0.203

-0.8

0.128

I can see there is a sign change

between -0.7 and -0.8
so I use 2 d.p

        x        y

-0.75

-0.046875

-0.76

-0.013376

-0.77

0.020867

-0.78

0.055848

-0.79

0.091561

I can see a sign change

Between -0.76 and -0.77

-0.761

-0.009985081

-0.762

-0.006586728

-0.763

-0.003180947

-0.764

0.000232256

-0.765

0.003652875

...read more.

Conclusion

G’(x)= √12x+2

image14.png

From the graph above you can see where both the rearrangement is successful and where it fails this is because of the gradient of y=³√6x²+2x-1 at where the graph y=x interact near (-0.5,-0.5) is more than 1.

image15.png

the reason for this fail is because the gradient of y=³√6x²+2x-1 is much larger than one meaning that section neither converges or diverges correctly so it was impossible to use both staircase diagram and cobweb diagram to determine the root.

        x        y

-0.05

-1.027566442

-1.027566442

1.485825571

1.485825571

2.47808672

2.47808672

3.442647822

3.442647822

4.254251613

4.254251613

4.878406213

4.878406213

5.331530284

5.331530284

5.648456535

5.648456535

5.864822571

5.864822571

6.010227998

6.010227998

6.106948094

6.106948094

6.170855114

        The

 f(x)= 2x³–5x²–4x+1

f’(x)= 6x²–10x–4

-1

-0.833333333

-0.833333333

-0.798474946

-0.798474946

-0.796929982

-0.796929982

-0.796926979

-0.796926979

-0.796926979

-0.796926979

-0.796926979

x0-f(x)/f’(x)= 1-

I found that each method had its own advantages and disadvantages for me I found Newton raphson method easy to use on the computer because autograph has a special tool that works everything out for you.

One of the equations used above is selected and the

Other two methods are applied successfully to find the Same root. There is a sensible comparison of the relative merits of The three methods in terms of speed of convergence. There is a sensible comparison of the relative merits of the three methods in terms of ease of use with available hardware and software.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    the root is -1.961703555, -1.96170 � 0.00005 Decimal Search This is where we look at between which two points the sign changes from a positive to negative. Similarly to before, I used excel to work out the value of f(x).

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    162 3.01 164.170824 218.1672 3 162 3.001 162.216108 216.2161 2 32 2.1 38.8962 74.088 2 32 2.01 32.64481602 64.96481 2 32 2.001 32.06404802 64.09605 1 2 1.1 2.9282 10.648 1 2 1.01 2.08120802 8.242408 1 2 1.001 2.008012008 8.024024 x x4 2x4 gradient 1 1 2 8 2 16 32

  1. MEI numerical Methods

    have to manually input a different values every iteration, this would also increase the chance of a mistake. Finally in order to make sure my approximation is correct I also made use of software called autograph. This piece of software allowed me to generate a graph of the equation y=+

  2. Numerical solutions of equations

    By looking at the diagram (see Figure 3), I can see that my starting value (x1) is -1.5. x1 = -1.5 x2 = -1.295 (I substituted x1 = -1.5 into the iterative formula to get the value for x2) x3 = -1.227690 (I substituted x2 = -1.295 into the iterative formula to get x3)

  1. Mathematical equations can be solved in many ways; however some equations cannot be solved ...

    Newton Raphson only takes 3 rows of calculations to find 2 results which match to 3 decimal places which is the specified degree of accuracy for the initial decimal search calculation. This is faster than the x=g(x) iteration as this method takes 4 rows of calculations to find 2 results that match to the specified degree of accuracy.

  2. Fixed point iteration: Rearrangement method explained

    By looking at the magnitude of g?(x) at the point of intersection with y = x I can tell whether or not method will work. At this point I see that g(x) line has a gradient of less than 1.

  1. Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

    Method 2: The Newton-Raphson Method Root ? Root ? For the second method, the Newton-Raphson Method, I will be using a different function. The equation I will be using is x3-7x2+x+3=0. This means that I will be drawing the function of f(x)=x3-7x2+x+3.Root ? Firstly, I started by entering the equation into Autograph to get a sketch of the graph.

  2. Evaluating Three Methods of Solving Equations.

    As before, I have italicised, emboldened and bordered the two x-values the root lies within. Newton-Raphson method: To apply the Newton-Raphson method, I found the derivative of this function which would be f'(x)=3x2-6x-15, and then applied the formula: Conclusion: All three methods seem to work effectively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work