• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using Decimal search

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Rameez Sheikh 13I

Pure 2 Coursework

Using Decimal search

In this investigation, I have chosen  x^5-14x+2=0. Such an equation cannot be solved algebraically.

The following graph represents y= f(x):

  • Graph  1 –

The graph shows me that  x^5-14x+2=0 has three roots, lying in the intervals (-2,-1) , (0, 1) , (1,2).

X

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Y

-199

-2

15

2

-11

6

203

Within the change of sign methods, decimal search method shall be used to find out an approximate value for roots of  x^5-14x+2=0.

In this method I first take increments of x of size 0.1 within the interval (1,2). I do this until I find a change in sign.

X

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

Y

-11

-11.78

-12.31

-12.48

-12.22

-11.40

-9.91

-7.6

-4.3

0.16

There is a sign change, and therefore a root, in the interval (1.8,1.9).

I can now continue with increments of 0.01 within the interval (1.8,1.9).

X

1.8

1.81

1.82

1.83

1.84

1.85

1.86

1.87

1.88

1.89

1.9

Y

-4.3

-3.91

-3.51

-3.09

-2.66

-2.23

-1.77

-1.31

-0.83

-0.34

0.16

This shows that the root lies in the interval (1.89,1.90).

We can express this information as, the root can be taken as 1.895 with maximum error of + 0.005

This can be shown graphically:

  • Graph 2 –

I have also chosen 10x^3-2.5x+0.2=0 which again cannot be solved algebraically.

The following graph represents y=f(x)

  • Graph 3 -

The graph shows me that 10x^3-2.5x+0.2=0 has three roots, lying in the intervals (-1,0), (0,1).

X

-1

0

1

Y

-7.3

0.2

7.7

I can stop here as there is no change of sign in interval (0,1).

...read more.

Middle

5x^3-1.5x+0.2=0 has 3 roots, lying in the intervals (-1,-0.5), (0,0.5)

X

-1

-0.9

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

Y

-3.3

-2.095

-1.16

-0.465

0.02

0.325

0.48

0.515

0.46

0.345

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0.2

0.055

-0.06

-0.115

-0.08

0.075

0.38

0.865

1.56

2.495

3.7

Therefore         Xn+1= x - (5x^3-1.5x+0.2)

                                   15x^2-1.5

                      = 15x^3-1.5x-(5x^3-1.5x+0.2)

                                15x^2-1.5

                      = 15x^3-1.5x-5x^3+1.5x-0.2

                                15x^2-1.5

Xn+1 = 10x^3-0.2        => The Newton-Raphson method for eq’n

                   15x^2-1.5        5x^3-1.5x+0.2=0

Results are as follows:

X

0.3

-0.46667

-0.68847

-0.61736

-0.60540

-0.60507

Xn+1

-0.46667

-0.68847

-0.61736

-0.60540

-0.60507

-0.60507

These results show that for a positive value of X, using the Newton-Raphson method on eq’n 5x^3-1.5x+0.2=0, it finds the root in the interval (-0.6,-0.7).

As shown in Graph 12, a tangent is taken at 0.3 to find the root between he interval (0.2,0.3). But instead finds the root in the interval (-0.6,-0.7).

We can express this information as, the root can be taken as –0.60507 with maximum error of + 0.000005. Therefore  -0.605065 < X < -0605075.

To check for the different signs,

f(-0.605065) = 5x^3-1.5x+0.2 = 0.00001

f(-0.605075) = 5x^3-1.5x+0.2 = -0.00002

  • Graph 13 –

Rearrangement method

The theory behind this iteration method is as follows.

image00.jpg

The situation might be as illustrated in the figure above. The following is examples of graphs of y = x and y = f(x) intersect at the root. The starting point is X0.

...read more.

Conclusion

+ 0.000005. Therefore  2.128415 < X < 2.128425.

To check for the different signs,

f(2.128415) = x^3-5x+1= -0.00003

f(2.128425) = x^3-5x+1= 0.00005

- Graph 18 -

Summary

If a < 0, and b > 0, then the root lies in the interval a < x < b. This idea is called achange of sign. We will not be able to find the root exactly, but we will be able to ‘home in’ on the root until we have it to the desired degree of accuracy. This method uses a much longer procedure to find the estimated root.

The Newton Raphson method does not need a change of sign, but instead uses the tangent to the graph at a known point to provide a better estimate for the root of the equation.

If the gradient = 0 at the starting point then no solution can be found by this method because we cannot divide by 0.

This method uses a much quicker procedure to find the root.

This is an alternative method that rearranges the original question into two equations, a straight line and a curve, and then finds where these meet.

Performing this iteration produces two possible results:

1. It diverges (i.e. it gets further and further away from the start). This means the rearrangement has not worked.

2. It converges (i.e. it homes in) to the root, and solves the equation.

This means that the solution may converge and provide you the solution or it may diverge. In this case a solution will not be found.

/

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    4 128 4.01 128.962402 96.4806 4 128 4.001 128.096024 96.04801 3 54 3.1 59.582 57.66 3 54 3.01 54.541802 54.3606 3 54 3.001 54.054018 54.03601 2 16 2.1 18.522 26.46 2 16 2.01 16.241202 24.2406 2 16 2.001 16.024012 24.02401 1 2 1.1 2.662 7.26 1 2 1.01 2.060602 6.1206

  2. Triminoes Investigation

    = a x 44 + b x 43 + c x 42 + d x 4 + e = 120 = 256a + 64b + 16c + 4d + e = 120 - equation 4 f(5)

  1. Although everyone who gambles at all probably tries to make a quick mental marginal ...

    Case 3 Reciprocal of Odds Actual Payout Estimated Payout Difference Squared 44 400 $10 000 $9925.92 5487.85 22 200 $5 000 $4509.12 240963.17 8 880 $1 000 $1732.17 536072.91 1 776 $500 $396.22 10770.29 444 $250 $156.96 8656.44 73.631840796 $200 $91.07 11865.74 41.3793103448 $150 $85.34 4180.92 Total = 817997.32 This

  2. The method I am going to use to solve x&amp;amp;#8722;3x-1=0 is the Change ...

    After all, both seems can work out the root and I have chosen Rearrangement B, which is x=V[(1-3x^5)/5]. So my iterative formula for this rearrangement is xn+1=V[(1-3xn^5)/5] I can see from my graph above that the point of intersections of the two lines is between x=0 and x=0.8(approximately).

  1. The Gradient Fraction

    x=3: 12.41 (round down to 12) the 3 has been multiplied by 4. x=4: 16.8 (round down to 16) the 4 has also been multiplied by 4. x=-2.5: -9.23 (round to -10) the -2.5 has been multiplied by 4. x=-4: -17.77 (round down to -16) the -4 has been multiplied by +4.

  2. maths pure

    within which a root lies and hence allowing us to calculate the maximum possible error in a result. From the calculations above, the solution to the function f(x) = 4x3+5 was found to be in the interval [-1.078, -1.077], which allowed for the answer to be quoted as ?1.0775 +/- 0.0005, 0.0005 being half the interval between the error bounds.

  1. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    EQUATION USED: = 0, , Case 1: Finding the ROOT of the Equation at [0.5,1] From Microsoft Excel: (Tbl NRM-01) n Xn f(Xn) f / (Xn) Xn+1 1 0.5 0.148721271 -1.351278729 0.610059655 2 0.61005 0.010362228 -1.159458807 0.61899678 3 0.61899 7.37235E-05 -1.142935937 0.619061283 4 0.61906 3.86344E-09 -1.142816146 0.619061287 When x =

  2. decimal search

    of where the root lies. Then new values of x are obtained by taking increments of 0.01 within the second interval, these values are again substituted into the f(x) until there is a change of sign, this will give an even closer interval of where the root lies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work