Analyse and discuss the structure of one ballet created for Diaghilev Ballet Russe.

Authors Avatar

Analyse and discuss the structure of one ballet created for Diaghilev Ballet Russe

Ballet in the last quarter of the ninetieth century across Western Europe, the forum of Romantic ballet had reached an all time low point. The great choreographers of the romantic era were dead, and no other choreographers had risen to take their place. Ballet seemed to have lost all of its creative momentum and the public had seized to regard it as a serious art form. It was no longer considered to be the mainstream art form that it had been in the 1830’s and 1840’s; it appeared to have lost touch with the modern times. Indeed, Ballet appeared to be an art form about to die of exhaustion. The legacy of the work of “Pulcinella”, first performed in 1920 was that it revived the interest in the techniques and interests of the past at a time when it would seem that many artists were more concerned with progress and technical ability than a perspective of history. More, importantly it demonstrated that music can comment itself and come to terms with it’s own history, through neo-classicism. This was one of the most important artistic movements of the twentieth century, and one that continues today.

Join now!

“Pulcinella” like “Petrouska”, was one of those rare theatrical works which, came with all of the ingredients to make it a success. Picasso’s neo-commedia dell’arte designs, Massine’s choreography, scenario and demi-character style of dancing and the wonderful dancing of Massine, as the eponymous rogue Pulcinella and the delicate femininity, romantic beauty and cordial spontaneity of Karsavina, Pulcinella’s mistress; Pimpinella. Every part of the structure declared the restoration of Russian ballet to its full form. With no hint of the classical ballet period, which had dominated the last centuries of ballet and the recent work of the Ballet Russe, there ...

This is a preview of the whole essay