In what ways in Stravinsky's Pulcinella Neo-Classical?

Authors Avatar by rmeehan (student)

Stravinsky believed that in Pulcinella he succeeded in composing something that went beyond a basic eighteenth-century reproduction. How far is this assessment valid in the case of the Sinfonia and Gavotta?

Stravinsky's belief as stated in the question provides a useful summary of the intentions of his neo-classical works. During the inter-war years he searched for ways of structuring and organising music to satisfy his need for order after the rejection of functional tonality shown in his earlier works. Ultimately, he decided that “submitting to a style”, rather than “restricting the manifestation of the composer's personality”, would “stand out better when put with the limits of a convention”. 

In the movements of Pulcinella, we therefore find music that is superficially copying the styles and conventions of the past, but subverting them in a variety of ways that the intelligent listener should be able to follow, and will seem all the more striking by virtue of this framework of styles of the past.

Join now!

The opening Sinfonia appears to follow the conventions of a Baroque movement in ritornello form. The ritornello theme returns in shortened forms and in different keys during the movement with intervening episodes. These episodes are played by solo groups of instruments in the manner of a concerto grosso. What is unusual is that Stravinsky uses two groups of solo instruments (one woodwind and one string) and gives them different episodes of contrasting character. He also uses the soloists in an accompanying role to a much larger extent than would be expected from an authentic Concerto Grosso, this role being left vacant ...

This is a preview of the whole essay