• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Behavioural Study of Obedience Stanley Milgram 1963 Many atrocities had been committed in the Second World War. Many culprits were put on trial for their lives in Nuremberg, at the end of the war. The chief defence was that they were only following orders from somebody above. This argument, followed to it's extreme would absolve every person involved in an atrocity, leaving only Hitler as the only person who could be found guilty (as he took orders from no one)! Naturally, with feelings running high at the end of the war, this defence was rejected outright, and many defendants were found guilty and hanged. Popular opinion for some time after the end of the Second World War was that there was something in the German character that made them particularly cruel. This is a dispositional view. People are genetically determined to act in a certain fashion, or are brought up to act in a certain fashion. Milgram questioned this dispositional view of the German character. He felt that the situation that many people had found themselves in had led to their cruel behaviour. It would follow from this, that most people, regardless of nationality, would perform cruel acts upon another, under certain situations. The defence for many of the war criminals had been they had been following orders. Milgram, reasoned that people could commit atrocities when they are given orders by somebody in authority. Details of Experiment Milgram tested his hypothesis by using a laboratory experiment. The subjects were chosen from volunteers who had responded to a newspaper article. This means the sample was self-selecting. ...read more.

Middle

This allows the subject to get used to following the instructions, and gives them a chance to warm up and produce a reasonable performance. The experimenter can also make sure that the subject is following his instructions carefully, and the experimenter is given a chance to correct any problems. The victim gives responses after each question, until the 300 volt shock. At this point pounding on the wall is heard and no response to the question is received from the victim. As you might have expected subjects turned to the experimenter for guidance at this point. The experimenter instructs the teacher to treat the absence of a response as an incorrect answer. The victim pounds on the wall (you will gather by now his legs are not bound!) at 315 volts, and continues not to answer the questions. At higher voltages the victim gives no response whatsoever, giving the impression that he is at the very least unconscious, and at the worse dead! Naturally, subjects will turn to the experimenter for guidance, before administering shocks of greater than 300 volts. The experimenter gives one of four scripted prods. 1. Please continue 2. The experiment requires that you continue 3. It is absolutely essential that you continue 4. You have no other choice; you must go on. The experimenter would initially use prod one, but if the subject refused to continue, the experimenter would try prod 2, and then prod 3 and finally prod 4, breaking off as soon as the subject continued. (How does this accord with the ethical point of allowing the subject to withdraw?) ...read more.

Conclusion

Milgram's experiment was deliberately ethnocentric, as he was interested to see whether Americans would be as obedient as German subjects. The results obtained from the American sample meant it wasn't necessary to test the German sample, as the Americans were expected to refuse the orders of the experimenter. Other psychologists have tested subjects from many different cultures and found that generally people regardless of culture tend to obey people in authority. Ethical considerations in Milgram are: � Consent - not informed. Participants volunteered for a learning experiment not one on obedience. � Deception - As to nature of experiment. Shocks not real. Victim not really a participant. � Asking colleagues - At first colleagues were asked and they said that the experiment would not cause any psychological problems. However, Milgram could have stopped at this point, but he went on to conduct numerous other trials. � Protection of participants - the participants displayed symptoms similar to that of a nervous breakdown. � Withdrawal from the investigation - physically yes the participants could, but with strong social pressure on them this was unlikely. The prods used, such as 'you have no alternative, you must go on' achieved this. � Observation - participants were filmed without their consent. � However, Milgram did debrief the participants. I trust Milgram was confidential and the participant's names that he used were made up. Your questions 1) Evaluate the problems of generalising in psychology, using Milgrams` > study of obedience as an example. > Just think of the artificiality of Milgram's study and you begin to see the problem of generalising. Additionally think of the self-selecting sample as one that is more likely to do as they are told. Return to Gary Sturt's Homepage _ ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Summary

The writer has gone into a great deal of detail about the experiment that Milgram carried out. There is very little to change in this essay since most of the comments made are positive ones. This work covers just about everything involved with Milgram's study and is an accurate account of the way in which the experiment was carried out. The writer has also given a thorough critique of Milgram's experiment. It is a really good piece of writing and worthy of full marks.

Score 5*

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 08/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and Evaluate Psychodynamic, Behaviourist and Humanist Theory of Psychology

    4 star(s)

    Humanists propose that humans do have free will and are not the sole product of their environment or childhood experiences. Humanists argue that people and personality should be viewed as a whole and that the breaking down of various aspects of personality results in the loss of the whole.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast the main approaches - Biological and Behaviourist, biological and cognitive, ...

    4 star(s)

    Such understanding has been applied in a hospital setting to reduce stress and anxiety to help patients recover quickly. The cognitive approach is also useful and has made important contributions to the field of psychology, particularly that for the treatment of depression.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast two psychological approaches

    4 star(s)

    A major difference between the two theories is the way they carry out their research. Behaviourism uses animals to gain an insight into human behaviour, whereas Psychodynamic uses human subjects to research into the inner psyche.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the five main perspectives in psychology

    3 star(s)

    For example, classical and operant conditioning is used in the training of animals and pets using punishment and rewards. As for treatment of humans, such methods like systematic desensitisation and flooding are used for the treatment of maladaptive behaviour. These include addiction to alcohol, drugs and smoking or the treatment of phobias.

  1. Define different theoretical perspectives used in counselling. Analyse the advantages and ...

    Two key figures within the humanistic approach are Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Maslow is best known for his hierarchy of needs and this describes the needs which have to be met in order of priority for a person to become fully complete as a person.

  2. Level 2 Counselling skills. Theories -CBT, Psychodynamic and Person Centred.

    In each of these stages, frustration or overindulgence may lead to a fixation on that stage and predictable adult personality characteristics. Freud?s theory therefore considers the influence of nature (things we are born with) and nurture (things that develop through experience).

  1. Psychological Analysis of Students Skipping School (Truancy)

    Maslow created his Hierarchy of Needs, it explains that basic needs must be fulfilled before higher order needs become important. Carl Rogers (1902 ? 1987) developed client-centered therapy. This approach focuses on the potential of each person to realize his or her own growth in self-awareness and self-fulfillment.

  2. Discuss Cross-Cultural Studies into Perception.

    Almost all the infants stopped at the point it looked like the depth changed with supports the idea that depth perception is an innate process not a learnt process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work