• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

“The Ontological argument will never be of any use when trying to prove Gods existence”. Discuss. (17 marks).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Ontological argument will never be of any use when trying to prove Gods existence". Discuss. (17 marks). Many people the ontological argument is a pointless and weak attempt at proving the existence of God. They argue it has to many problems and unanswered questions to be of any use to us today. However, some find it a very encouraging and up-building theory, which strengthens their belief that there is a God for us to worship, and share a loving relationship with. The question all of us are concerned with however, is 'can we use the ontological argument to prove Gods existence today?' To decide whether it will be of any use, we need to look at its problems and its strengths to see if we can logically come to the same conclusion Anselm and Descartes arrived at. Using an A priori argument, monk Gaunilo came up with the first reply to Anselm's theory. He said that we 'cannot define something into existence' using the metaphor of an island, which he said if it was perfect then this island had to exist. ...read more.

Middle

This is using an analytical argument to come to a conclusion after looking at the terms used. However one of the biggest problems he proposed is that we can't prove he actually exists using the theory formed by Descartes. He agreed that IF he did exist, just like the triangle needs three sides and angles, then God would exist perfectly. However this does not mean He does actually exist, we can never rid the above statement of its 'IF'. If we cannot get rid of the if then we are not proving anything. Vardy uses the example of a unicorn saying that if unicorns did exist then they would have to have horns but this does not mean they do actually exist. The second problem, and the one with the most destructive impact, was the idea that we cannot say that existence is a characteristic of perfection. The idea of perfection does not add anything to the nature of God, just like my previous comparison to �100. The fact that the perfect �100 is sitting in front of me, does not make it a more perfect �100 than one that wasn't. ...read more.

Conclusion

If the argument tries to prove that God exists, has necessary existence and is perfect as an objective proof to an atheist, which is what Descartes was trying to do, then it fails. However if it tries to strengthen the faith in God and His 'otherness' to an existing believer, which as Anselm said was the only reason he wrote the argument, then it completely succeeds. We can therefore conclude that it is wrong to say the ontological argument 'will never be of use' because to some people it helps them become closer to God and their religion as it proves to them that He does exist for them. Like most philosophical arguments, it depends on your beliefs as to whether the argument is successful, so if you already believe in the Christian perfect idea of God then this strengthens your belief in him. The argument does not however reach our initial goal to prove the existence of God to everyone and change the way our society behaves and lives, because without objective proof for everyone then many will still ponder on the vital question 'does God really exist?'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    We cannot conceive of things we did not experience. As Kant responded to Descartes argument, if there is no triangle there are no 3 sides or any degrees so if there is no perfection God does not exist. Apparently perfection does not exist in our world so God cannot exist..

  2. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    Existence is a perfection. Therefore God exists. Descartes offered an analogy, with regards to his argument, in that Gods relationship with existence can be thought of as a Triangles relationship with its angles; that is to say, just as a triangle cannot be thought of as such if it does not possess 3 sides, neither can God

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    The weakness with his argument, the weakness that causes it to fail is step 6 which is very suspicious and an atheist could argue with justification that God's existence was impossible.

  2. Explain how Descartes developed Anselm's argument that God's existence is necessary

    Anselm's second argument concludes that God has to exist and cannot fail to exist, in philosophical terms this is called necessary existence.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    For example the world could've been bungled before this system was made. 5) Non-moral God Hume lists unpleasant features of nature such as earthquakes, war and disease and questions how the planning and design could be that of a just God.

  2. DISEMBODIED EXISTENCE CAN NEVER BE EXPLAINED COHERENTLY, BECAUSE IT IS A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS. ...

    themselves without consideration of their body, then disembodied existence of both themselves and others, becomes less contradictory and coherent from this point of view. On the other hand, even if the linguistics were to accept the life after death proposition, they could argue the problems of identification, because now, we recognise others, by their physicality.

  1. Outline the ontological argument and explain how it proves the existence of God and ...

    This difference is important as in Anselm's second form he argues that if God is unsurpassable in all ways then he must be necessary by definition and therefore God exists, necessarily. Anselm claims that the definition of God recognised by all would include existence and so God must exist as the concept of God includes existence.

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    Thomas Aquinas also had this criticism suggesting that people do not know the nature of God and therefore cannot conceive, Aquinas adds the ontological argument would only be useful to someone who understands the essence of God and he does not believe any human is capable of such great understanding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work