• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Mills comments about the problem of evil are fatal to the teleological argument.

Extracts from this document...


'Mill's comments about the problem of evil are fatal to the teleological argument.' Mill was born a year after the death of Paley, the most famous advocate and contributor of the teleological argument, and as an empiricist, fervently disagreed with his works and the works of his predecessors in Aquinas and the classical philosophers of Plato and Aristotle among others. Mill challenged the idea that evidence of design in the world proves the existence of the God of classical theism because evidence supported either the non-existence of God or a God that did not have the attributes accepted by Christianity. Mill pointed towards natural empirical evidence to disprove the teleological argument. He argued that because there is evil and suffering in the world, then the designer cannot have been all-powerful, all-knowing and all-loving; the very foundations of modern Christianity. ...read more.


Augustine emphasised that suffering and evil were unknown because, as he took the bible literally word for word, all God made please Him. Augustine believed that Natural Evil originated from the loss of order within nature following the original sin and fell away from God and therefore a distance from Goodness and evil entered the world. In this damaged environment, remote from God, moral evil also flourished and spread. Whilst Augustine's theodicy addresses the key points with the problem of evil and suffering, issues still exist with flaws in the theodicy that essentially does not solve the problem. Irenaeus challenged the idea that evil is necessarily bad. Irenaeus believed that evil must exist for us to have free will. ...read more.


The Teleological Argument cannot be effective if the Christian concept of God does not run true. Whilst the arguments of Irenaeus and Augustine work to an extent, they are flawed each in their own way; Augustine's view of the Bible is decadent at best and problems are rife with the literal approach he takes. Irenaeus' theodicy addresses the problem of moral evil successfully but does not manage the same feat with the problem of natural evil, the more lethal to the teleological argument of the two. Whilst Mill cannot destroy the teleological, he manages to shake the foundations if not break them. The theodicies are such that they may strengthen belief in Christianity rather than convert or truly defend themselves from a serious challenge. Atheists may agree with the statement that it is a lethal blow to the teleological argument, whereas Christians may hold that the theodicies stand up to Mill's challenge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to ...

    suffer until they die, surely such a great theistic God would not have allowed such viruses to exist and control the lives of so many. The holocaust is an example of genocide amongst many other genocides such as those imposed by Idi Amin , the cruel dictator of Uganda for

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Yes, it is true that there is no constant value in morality, but I'm not half glad that we no longer live in a society that believes public flogging to be an acceptable form of punishment. Of course, this argument would hold no water with Nietzsche, who would probably dismiss

  1. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot ...

    Surely in heaven we could learn to become closer to the likeness of God without having to suffer all the evil the world throws at us. All these questions weaken the theodicy of Irenaeus bringing many of the ideas behind it into question.

  2. 'A belief in the life after death solves the problem of evil' Discuss

    will know that to move on to better things after this life they will have to be good in this life in order to receive the rewards of the after life. If they have been bad in this life they will not be rewarded as well as they can be.

  1. problem of evil

    The knowledge of them could only come from God. Scientific difficulties stem from the modern world's concept of evolution; the idea of a perfect world being damaged by humans does not allow for evolution. Moreover, Augustine refers to the Garden of Eden in his theodicy, and this paradise is hard to accept on the basis of evolution.

  2. Explain and describe Augustine and Irenaeus' Theodicies

    mislead Eve, 'Cursed is the ground because of' him. This was his explanation of natural and moral evil. They abused their free will and tried to become 'lord of their own being' by disobeying God. Moreover the rest of humanity, as descendents from Adam and Eve, shared their sin, they were 'seminally present' in Adam's loins.

  1. Assess What Can Be Concluded From The Teleological Argument

    This would support the idea that God is a supremely intelligent being if he is able to already create something as complex as the world.

  2. ) Explain the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine ?

    As well as this with reference to unforgiveable events such as the holocaust, where eleven million people died for belonging

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work