• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

(a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked to religion (30 mks) (b) Examine and discuss the reasons for arguing that morality should not be linked to religion (15 mks)

Extracts from this document...


RELIGIOUS ETHICS (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked to religion (30 mks) (b) Examine and discuss the reasons for arguing that morality should not be linked to religion (15 mks) Ans. (a) In seeking to determine the link between morality and religion it is necessary to look back into previous civilizations such as those of Egypt and India where the existence of God and the divine world was almost unquestioned, and the after-death fate of human beings was decided by the purity and goodness of their conduct during this life. In India for example the principle of universal moral order, called dharma, is to be found in the operation of natural law and in the laws of morality. According to Indian thought, all actions have consequences. As we sow, so shall we reap, and the fruits of actions are like their seed : if we act with harmful or selfish intent, then not only will other people be hurt, but we also suffer in the long run. If we act with benevolent intent, not only will others be helped, but our actions will purify our hearts and bring us closer to God. In ancient Greece however the philosophers began to challenge and question the link between morality and religion and indeed began to question religious belief itself. Plato argued that virtue is knowledge and that people will be virtuous if they know what virtue is, and that evil or vice is the result of ignorance. ...read more.


It makes no sense for us to be afraid when we violate the moral law if we are not afraid of someone to whom we are answerable for our disobedience. It is possible that the guilt we feel is guilt at having disappointed or betrayed our partners, children or employers, but the believer argues that human sin and rebellion, even if it affects someone else, is ultimately rebellion against God - sin - and it is to him that we are ultimately answerable. The German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) argued that the moral law demanded the existence of God. The moral law, to be just, required that human beings be rewarded or punished according to their deeds. However, this was evidently not the case in the world, where evil people prospered and the good suffered. An afterlife was therefore necessary to redress the balance, and God must exist to make this adjustment and to satisfy the demands of the moral law. For the Christian therefore morality and religion are inseparably linked. The Bible contributes to ethics in the following ways : * It gives Christians a theological basis for moral obligations, in terms of the individual`s obligations to do the will of God. * It provides Christians with an account of the relation of morality to God`s purposes in creation, explaining how God`s purpose is hindered by wrong living and how God`s grace can restore righteous living. ...read more.


They would also argue that Christian ethics are repressive - ie. sometimes Christian ethics are viewed as a set of 'do nots', interpreted in a life-denying way, making them appear restrictive and curtailing individual autonomy and freedom. Hector Hawton (humanist) explains humanism`s rejection of moral absolutes when he stated 'Humanists in rejecting divinely-ordained moral absolutes, opt instead for relative autonomy for man in relation to ethical considerations. The humanist emphasis on free-thinking and reason - also explains its rejection of moral absolutes (which in the humanist view are an insult to human intelligence - which the religions mistrust). Clearly we must recognise that it is possible to be moral without being religious and that therefore morality can exist independently of religion. The most ardent atheist can live a life of good works, clean living, integrity and compassion, and will be able to explain why the moral standards by which he / she lives are the best possible standards for humankind. To suggest otherwise is not only arrogant but also would be to ignore a wealth of evidence which humanists are quick to cite - where religion has contributed to many unethical / immoral activities (eg. millions killed over the centuries inWars of Religion not to mention religious sectarian bitterness in N.Ireland, the involvement of religious people in the Slave trade in 19th century, forced conversions of native peoples of Latin America by `Christian' missionaries, abuse of children by Christian clergy etc.) throughout history. D.McCready 14.05.01 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religion and Morality

    rather than being the authority that says things are good, and therefore God is not necessary. Whereas if 'x' is good because God commanded it, we wouldn't know what was right or wrong until God told us, showing that God is necessary for us to know what is moral or immoral.

  2. The arguments for and against the view that morality is dependant on religion, and ...

    Acts are intrinsically good or bad. When humans do a good act they are acting in accordance with God and that's why those actions are good, in this respect, morality is dependant on religion. Aquinas believed that each human being should live their life to glorify God with self preservation,

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    In order for intervention to count as humanitarian, at least part of the basic reason for intervening must be to end suffering or oppression, though there might be other reasons which also motivate, for example national interest."2 However, humanitarian intervention, as suggested by the title of this essay, is ruled out by the morality of states.

  2. Compare and contrast the application of two ethical theories to a moral dilemma. Discuss ...

    For Kant good is the good will, seeking what your duty is. For a Utilitarian good is pleasure, seeking what will cause happiness. Kantian ethics is therefore concerned with duty and takes justice into account, while Utilitarianism is concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number and does not include justice.

  1. From the religion you have studied, discuss the view that religious ethics must be ...

    Although Bentham, one of the main contributors to the development of utilitarianism, created a Hedonic Calculus, stating how to 'measure' happiness, ambiguity would still always arise. Moreover, one should take into consideration the notion of this theory that happiness is the main decisive factor in making moral decisions.

  2. There are no moral absolutes, discuss.

    The only difference being that they have to make choices based on what they value most (future hunters), these choices we do not have to face. This said the Eskimo example is also a benefactor the relativist approach of situation ethics.

  1. Explain the differences between absolute and relative morality. 'Relativist theories give no convincing reason ...

    Absolute refers to the fact that the moral laws will not and cannot change, and are the same for everyone everywhere through all periods of time, such as Kant's deontological theory. Relative means the rules may change depending on the circumstances, the individual, the society or the time period.

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    If God can no longer claim ultimate responsibility of control, his omnipotence is damaged because it means he is not ?all? powerful. Moreover, God depends on his goodness to the extent to which he conforms to an independent moral standard.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work