• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse paragraphs 11 & 12 of Peter Donovans article 'Can we know God by experience?'

Extracts from this document...


Donovan Paragraphs 11 & 12 A. In his essay 'Can we know God by experience?' Peter Donovan analyses the possibility of having direct, intuitive knowledge of God. Having done this Donovan considers the views of 20th century theologians and philosophers who have argued that religious experience may provide knowledge of God through intuition. Donovan points out how this idea of intuitive knowledge fits with established Christian ways of thinking: God is a personal being who acts in history. He then distinguishes psychological feelings of certainty from actually being right on logical grounds, and associates intuitive awareness of God with the former. Donovan points out that our sense of certainty is often mistaken, an observation he takes from Bertrand Russell. Although he considers the possibility that experience of God might be a personal encounter (I-You), Donovan rejects the idea that this is itself a form of knowledge. He does not accept that intuition can provide knowledge of God, but claims that this point does not undermine the value of religious experiences altogether. ...read more.


we can infer the cause (God). Hume argued that cause and effect does not operate as simply as this. Moreover many modern scientists influenced by Darwin such as Richard Dawkins have argued that by looking at nature we can infer only what is scientifically provable through testing, and that to look at the Earth and to make the jump to God is too great. Another example of Owen's that Donovan uses to gain a sense of God's reality in this extract is religious experience that comes as a product of secular pressures of life. This again is a controversial area of sociology and philosophy that has been addressed in detail by Karl Marx. Marx argued that rather than being a source from which to gain knowledge of God, religious experiences that are triggered by secular pressures are a form of 'religious opium' that act to nullify the pains of those with lower social status. Marx went on to counter the religious experiences of those of higher social status by claiming that these religious interactions merely act to reaffirm the positions of the ruling classes who are desperate to keep hold of their power. ...read more.


One key proponent of the idea that we can learn about God through natural theology is Mother Teresa who used her views of nature to conclude that "God is the friend of silence. See how nature - trees, flowers, grass- grows in silence; see the stars, the moon and the sun, how they move in silence... We need silence to be able to touch souls" As has been shown by all the conflicting viewpoints on the acquisition of knowledge about God, it seems to be an area of philosophy that, like many others, is inconclusive largely due to its subjective nature. In this extract Donovan points out how this idea of intuitive knowledge fits with established Christian ways of thinking, however Donovan in the rest of the article goes on to acknowledge the weaknesses of gaining knowledge of God, arriving at the conclusion that there is no justification for an all or nothing view of religious experience as despite its weaknesses it still has significant value to the individual. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. `I know God exists, because I have an idea of perfection Discuss whether knowledge ...

    This facility would operate independently of our five senses, and in a way provide us with almost some kind of 'sixth sense'. The plausibility of this claim is relatively strong, as it does appear possible, that we are equipped with a priori knowledge to enable us to make sense of the external world.

  2. Discuss the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    As Kierkegaard writes, "doubt is conquered by faith, just as it is faith which has brought doubt into the world. If this is the case, then there is little point in analysing religious experience as it is by its nature a faith proposition, not an empirical one.

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    > He also makes a difference between Sense - perception and Ideas/ essences. Conclusion: > Appearances are only the truth of opinion and so we can't relay only on our senses. But the mind has the ability to TRANSCEND, meaning reach the world of ideas AND essence and think about what our senses show us.

  2. Examine and Comment on a philosophical analysis of religious experience

    This is defined as 'the mysterium tremendum et fascinans that leads in different cases to belief in deities, the supernatural, the sacred, the holy, and the transcendent.'6 This ambiguous definition illustrates the difficulty of defining and analysing a more private experience of God.

  1. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    Need to explain the 3 concepts but first re familiarise with material. Also explain good faith and bad faith. Anguish - Crazy woman. Abraham Abandonment - Pupil asking for advice, Jesuit priest.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    I think Sartre's big stink with this statement would be that he may not consider these "damaged" persons as people at all. He would more than likely cast these physical beings aside as nothing more than artifacts of choice and chance of the person that existed within the particular physical confines.

  1. Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

    Just as John Wisdom?s parable of the gardener shows how a religious belief is unfalsifiable, a religious experience contains the same inherent flaw. Whereas the analysis of scientific theory is absolutely necessary and exists permanently, there is not the same necessary level of analysis needed.

  2. What makes a person valuable?

    On the other hand, some people may counter argue against this pointing out that they do have a certain level of consciousness as they cry when they are hungry; this shows they have some understanding. But however, dogs do this as well; they bark, start salivating and run to their

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work