• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Analyse the arguments which philosophers use to claim that ethical language is not meaningful but emotive.

Extracts from this document...


Analyse the arguments which philosophers use to claim that ethical language is not meaningful but emotive. Principally the claim that ethical language is not meaningful but emotive stems from the theory of logical positivism, a variant of the verification principle. Logical positivists argue that because there is no logical basis or sense data to back up ethical statements, ethical statements are, therefore, meaningless. A.J. Ayer, who was the first exponent of this argument, said that since ethical language is meaningless, it just expresses our emotions or feelings. Logical positivism is a theory of meaning and states that language only has meaning if it can be verified logically (analytically) or by sense experience (synthetically). Analytic facts are verified by definition; often they are mere tautologies such as 'all bachelors are unmarried men,' or 'one plus one equals two.' These are statements, which are verified a priori, their truth is found simply by looking at their constituent parts. To suggest that a bachelor was anything other than an unmarried man would simply be a contradiction. Synthetic facts on the other hand are facts, which are verified by observation or sense data. ...read more.


Therefore, ethical statements cannot be verified analytically. Now, in order for ethical language to be verified synthetically an empirical basis for moral language would have to be found. The normative subjectivist and utilitarian positions have both attempted to present a system for defining what is 'good' or 'right', which can be reduced to facts. The rightness of actions is defined by subjectivists as that which is approved of by an individual or group and similarly by utilitarians as the quantity of pleasure resulting from the action. The essential test for Ayer was "whether statements of ethical value can be translated into statements of empirical fact" (Ayer 2001, 106). If the subjectivist or utilitarian views were true Ayer's test would have been satisfied since their respective definitions of right present a verifiable measure that would satisfy the logical positivist principle. Both the approval of an individual or group and the amount of pleasure resulting from an action are not fundamentally different from facts and therefore would satisfy the logical positivist principle. However, neither subjectivism nor utilitarianism presents a satisfactory argument, which reduces what is right to an empirical measure. ...read more.


Therefore, absolutism cannot prove that ethical terms have an empirical root and therefore, given that the subjectivist and utilitarian theories have likewise failed, it has been shown that ethical language is meaningless because it cannot be verified by any factual observations. Hence, the inclusion of ethical-terms in propositions adds no meaning. The example given by Ayer was that to say 'You were wrong in stealing that money' adds no extra meaning to the statement 'You stole that money,' since, as was previously demonstrated, making an ethical statement about the rightness or wrongness of stealing is meaningless. Ayer stated that ethical language, therefore, merely expresses our feelings at the time. Since the supposed factual element of ethical language has been removed, we are merely left with its emotive element. To conclude, Philosophers have used the logical positivist position to argue that there are no ethical positions, which can support the verification of ethical language by analytic or synthetic methods. Therefore, on the basis of this argument ethical language is rendered meaningless and therefore should only be considered by its emotive content. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religious Language cannot be proved, therefore it is meaningless

    that to them and within their frame work of life and their beliefs, god exists, and therefore the statement for them is meaningful. It can be said that meaning is based on interpretation. For example, if one adopts a realist stand point especially that of a naïve realist, it may

  2. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    systems, such as blood donation, because people would no longer feel obliged to donate without a payment. To strengthen my argument against paid organ donation, there are many other negative effects that could be created from such a system. To start with, a paid system could encourage exploitation of less

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    The rational arm of conscience comes in when it is time to decide what that function is, and how/whether it has been fulfilled. As for the matter of the reliability of conscience, Butler's functionalist view brings us to the following argument.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    then how can we really be sure of anything in the world? Is the rightness and wrongness of murder, for example, simply a matter of how we feel on the subject? If so, what is the point of certain rules and laws?

  1. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    This is where Christian ethics will include the idea that God created us, instructed us to reproduce and so on, and so seen in this light, Situation Ethics will originate from the belief that is generally in our best interests to create families, nurturing and educating our children.

  2. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    Thus, murderers should be punished with the death penalty. Haag also uses the situation with current prisoners to elaborate his point of how capital punishment is a deterrent. Prisoners serving life sentences and who are not sentenced to execution relatively follow prison rules and norms because the possibility of a more severe punishment or sentence does exist.

  1. With reference to relevant ethical theories, explain the arguments used to support developments in ...

    countries, such as India and China, boys are more desired and therefore the child and family will have a higher quality of life overall. Personal autonomy and choice is key to this debate. Personal autonomy is the capacity to decide for oneself and pursue a course of action in one's life, often regardless of any particular moral content.

  2. Give an account of the ethical arguments in support of suicide.

    As for duty to self, Hume takes it to be obvious that there can be times when suicide is desirable, though he also thinks it ridiculous that anyone would consider suicide unless they first considered every other option. Freud claims that our psyche develops in three stages: firstly, the id

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work