• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of a utilitarian argument for the abolition of the death penalty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the strengths and weaknesses of a utilitarian argument for the abolition of the death penalty. A different way of looking 'objectively' at morality is Utilitarianism. Both founders of Utilitarianism were child prodigies. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) could read Latin and Greek when he was five years old and graduated from Oxford at 16. J.S. Mill (1806-1873) could speak fluent Greek at the age of three and was helping his father to write economics when he was 14. Both men were radical empiricists. They thought that knowledge had to come from the senses and not just be invented by the mind. ...read more.

Middle

For Bentham, laws should be passed only if they maximize pleasure and minimize pain for the majority of people. This is how Utilitarianism works. Instead of relying on vague ideas about feelings or conscience you classify and measure any action in terms of how many units of pain or pleasure it will produce. For Utilitarians, motives are unimportant, only consequences count. The stress is on the act rather than the agent. Bentham and Mill would argue that people's motives couldn't be seen or measured, but the consequences of their actions can be. ...read more.

Conclusion

Mill also thought that most ordinary people should normally stick to traditional moral rules, rather than 'calculate' what they should do all the time. Perhaps this makes Mill a Rule Utilitarian - someone who believes that morality should still be about obeying moral rules, even if rules are decided upon Utilitarian grounds. There are typically three types of Utilitarians - Act, Rule and Preference. Act utilitarianism simply deals with the consequences of individual acts, and accepts no general rules, except that we should promote the greatest happiness. Rule utilitarianism allows respect for those rules that are established in society in order to allow the greatest happiness to the greatest number. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of Utilitarianism

    * The refusal to acknowledge intrinsically wrong acts: a judge might convict an innocent man in order to prevent a riot that would ensue if he were not convicted - a utilitarian would argue that this is permissible because more people would be made unhappy by the lack of a

  2. What is Natural Moral Law? What are the strengths and weaknesses of NML?

    We are meant to live, grow, reproduce and die. However there are people such as Mother Theresa and St Thomas Aquinas who have both failed to reproduce - does that mean that these two are wrong bad bad people ?

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    However, this can cause problems if you use this rule in a place where it is not generally followed, as problems will be caused if you differ from the general population. Another problem, a problem which can be applied to both at and rule utilitarianism is that it is impossible

  2. Analyse and explain the strengths and weaknesses of deontology

    However, this can be seen as a great strength of Kant's theory as by relying on logic it is technically incontestable, and therefore more convincing than those which rely on unverifiable eschatological claims which depend largely on faith. I would contest the idea that Kant hinges his theory on; that his claims are based on logic alone.

  1. Explain what you think is the strongest objection to this argument. Next, explain what ...

    "If it's true that it is wrong to kill Don Marquis because it has a valuable future, then is wrong to abort Don Marquis for exactly the same reason".

  2. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    If we feel bad about explaining the Death Penalty to our children then we should not have to explain it at all. There is a large majority of Christians in this country, yet such a small number of them actually come up in opposition to the Death Penalty; oftentimes, in fact, they are its most avid supporters.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    therefore makes it his fundamental identity, and to see it that way paves him to see himself as a Citizen of the Kingdom of Ends. This is moral identity. Like the social identities, moral identity carries obligations. And this identity stands with other identities.

  2. Explain Aquinass cosmological argument

    Assess how far Aquinas' cosmological argument shows that it is possible to believe in God Aquinas tries to prove the existence of God using logic that is within the understanding and experiences of the human being. This logical way of looking at arguments that attempt justify the existence of God

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work