• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the view that only minds, and their ideas, exist.

Extracts from this document...


Conor McGloin - 12:1 ASSESS THE VIEW THAT ONLY MINDS, AND THEIR IDEAS, EXIST. (24 marks) The view that there is no physical world, and only our minds exist, is the basis of an 'Idealist' school of thought. Idealism is based upon the notion that, because we can not claim to have any direct knowledge of the material world, there is no way we can be sure that the world around us actually exists. The reason we can never have 'direct' experience of the world is that we only experience it through our senses. These senses can be deceived and, therefore, we have no reason to believe that they give us a view of how the world is, and not how it appears. The idealist theory is an empirical theory, as well as being an a posteriori theory. From these notions, some philosophers theorised that there was no physical world at all, and just a mental world built from our precepts. ...read more.


The counter-intuitive aspect of the idealist argument appears to be the biggest stumbling block the theory is facing. Berkley, a British philosopher and subscriber to the idealist school of thought, put forward the theory that we can not imagine something that is not purely mental, because the process of imagining is mental itself. An idealist argues that in order for something to exist, it must be perceived. Because perception is a mental event, the object being perceived must also be a mental event. Therefore, the denial of an external world is not denied. It is theorised that the world does exist, but as a series of mental events. To return to Berkley's point. Dr. Johnson, a writer, attempted to present a counter argument to Berkley's point. He kicked a stone, with Berkley watching, and stated 'I refute thee thus'. He appeared to think that simply by kicking the stone, he would prove it had physical substance, as well as being a mental event in itself. ...read more.


For example, I may believe that the British flag contains the colour green. If I consider that every time I have seen the British flag in the past it has not contained the colour green, and that my friend tells me the flag has no green in it, I see that this belief is not coherent with my other beliefs regarding the colours contained in the British flag. We may argue that the very notion of coherent beliefs is, in its essence, a circular argument. We must depend on beliefs for which we can have no direct evidence, in order to justify beliefs that themselves have no direct evidence. It is this point that particularly troubles me with regards to the system of thought known as Idealism. Also, idealism appears to be in complete contradiction with my common sense view of the world. I must admit, however, that I find the arguments on the side of idealism hugely compelling, and for that reason, I don not feel I can personally deny the possibility that I am living in a purely mental state. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Why does the mind and body problem still exist?

    For the epiphenomenalists the brain was a machine like everything in nature and the mind no more than a passive reflection of its activity. During the present century various attempts have been made to refine the epiphenomenalists formulation. Thus the so called 'mind-brain identity' theory associated with herbert Feigl in

  2. There is no Reason to Assume I will exist after my Death.

    In his 'Discourse on the method' (1637), Descartes argues: "Our soul is of a nature entirely independent of the body, and consequently it is not bound to die with it. And since we cannot see any other causes which destroys the soul, we are naturally led to conclude that it is immortal."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work