• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Augustine on creation and Aquinas on the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Kimbel Farwell Phil 20B 1/5/2010 Augustine In Augustine's writing, The Confessions, he philosophically attempts to answer the problems that arise within religion, specifically in regards to Judeo Christian beliefs, pertaining to God, time, and creation. Augustine first addresses the belief that God created everything. He tries to provide a coherent explanation for his claim that God's ex-nihilo ("out of nothing") creation of the Earth is a sound statement, given that God created everything, and with it time. Thus, the notion of time never existed before its very point of creation. However, given that God created everything, and thus the universe, what was God doing before the universe's creation that caused him to decide to create it or that it was now necessary as opposed to before. Furthermore, if God even had to make the decision whether or not the universe's existence was necessary, making him arbitrary, wouldn't that inherently falsify the claim that God is a perfect being (omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent) and thus is immutable. Augustine objects this claim by stating that God is eternal, in that he is timeless, and so exists outside the realm of time. He is therefore not bound (or defined) by any temporal concept. So, when faced with the problem of what God was doing before he created the universe, Augustine simply claims it is an illogical question. He justifies that if one accepts the belief that God is eternal and created everything, than one can't logically ask what God was doing at a certain point before the creation of time itself, as it was not yet in existence. ...read more.

Middle

He explains that this phenomenon exists within the mind in three different forms of reality. The three realities of the mind are comprised of when the mind expects, attends, or remembers. In other words, that what the mind expects, passes by way of what it attends, into being what it remembers. Furthermore, it is only our attention that endures, through which what is still to be makes its way into the state of where it is no more. Therefore, our attention is continually present, as the future is being passed through the present and changes into the past. Augustine concludes that it is this "tension" or flow that constitutes time, in that time can only be understood in terms of a manmade psychological phenomenon. For Augustine, his philosophical conclusion that time doesn't exist in any tangible way but is merely a product of the human mind, justifies the claim that God's existence is outside the realm of human's perception of time. Augustine expects that from the acceptance of this notion of time, God's exemption from time in no way means that he is deficient or more limited than humans in any aspect, but that conversely, he is more powerful. Aquinas Aquinas argues the problem of God's existence in three ways: First, he addresses whether or not the existence of God is self-evident, second, whether or not his existence can be demonstrated and, finally, whether or not God actually exists. In addressing the issue of whether or not God's existence is self-evident, Aquinas provides three objections in support of the argument. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, building upon Aristotle's views of change, Aquinas asserts that the same rule governing change can also be applied to the argument of movement. Therefore, if in accordance with the same rule, something in motion cannot simultaneously be both the mover and moved, since something in motion must be put in motion by something other than itself. Thus, in order to find what caused the first movement to occur, one would need to trace the seminal causes of such movement back to, in effect, infinity. However, Aquinas claims it's illogical to accept that the initial force could only be defined in relation to an infinite chain of causes. Consequently, the only sound conclusion would have to include the existence of a first mover, such as something along the lines of an unmoved mover. For Aquinas, the existence of an unmoved mover/unchanged changer proves the existence of a force that could only be God. Aquinas concludes that only God could be the force behind the existence of some unmoved mover, if motion is created in two different ways. The first is exemplified by the example of some "X" (i.e. a leg) moving some "Y" (i.e. a ball). So, that in this first example, even though "X" causes the movement of "Y," it also follows that "X" is moving too. Subsequently, Aquinas concludes that given the notion that any "X" which is able to cause "Y" to move, while at the same time able to remain motionless, could only be the result of a being "X" equivalent to a much-elevated force that uniquely has to be God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Proof and Probability in Arguing for God's Existence.

    Should euthanasia be classified as murder? Is murder always wrong? A challenge to the premises of an argument is a challenge not to the argument's validity, but to the argument's 'goodness'. An argument may be deductively valid but not good. The American philosopher of Religion Alvin Plantinga suggests this as a possible argument for God's existence: (1)

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Moving from concept to reality Like Hume Many argue agaisnt the ontological argument because they claim it move from an idea or concept to reality, that is just not possible 3. Not great-making quality Kant argues that existence is not a predicate, doesn't tell us what object is like.

  1. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    This dismisses the sceptics claim that there should be some sort of testing method about justifying religious experience. A person may claim to have seen God where as another might argue they have seen the devil, as both are basing this experience on a personal a priori perception of God/Devil

  2. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    A contemporary of Mill, Catholic Cardinal John Henry Newman believed that to follow conscience is to follow a divine law as it is a messenger from God. Like Mill, he saw responsibility to God as a focal part of the function of the conscience.

  1. Assess the view that conscience is not the voice of God, but is learned?

    Another supporter of the conscience being God given is the 18th century philosopher Joseph Butler. For Butler, the conscience is the most important thing a human can posses, he believed the most crucial thing which distinguishes men and women from animals is the possession of the faculty of reflection and conscience; for Butler being human is being moral.

  2. The concept of disembodied existence is coherent - Discuss

    God certainly might have created a perfect duplicate of the original manuscript, but it would not be that one; its earliest moment of existence would have been after Augustine's death; it would never have known the impress of his hand; it would not have been a part of the furniture of the world when he was alive; and so on."

  1. Explain Wittgenstein(TM)s attack on the notion of a logically private language

    Mental states such as an itch, a non linguistic state, which is supposed to be solitary and private (in the mind of the individual), surely the problem arises in that it seems difficult for a name to be acquired for my state of mind, if no one can see what

  2. Discuss the concept of Natural Law with reference to the ideas of Aristotle and ...

    law to try them, as the laws of their own country (Nazi Germany) at the time permitted them to do evil. ?Natural Law leads to unjust decisions.? I agree with this statement, this is because natural law can be contradictory and is often applied inconsistently.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work