• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can moral absolutism be justified?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Moral absolutism cannot be justified" Discuss There are arguments to suggest that moral absolutism cannot be justified as it is not a reasonable solution to any ethical situation. The theory of moral relativism upholds that there are no universally valid moral principles, opposing the theory of moral absolutism. Relative morals can change according to the situation, where as absolutism leaves no flexibility for certain situations. Some would put forward the view that examining an ethical situation from a teleological point of view is a greater means of deciding how to act than absolutism. Teleological ethics explain that actions are right or wrong depending on the outcome; the outcome of an action is not taken into account in the principles of moral absolutism therefore this could be seen as a weakness. Problems in disregarding the consequences of a moral action could arise in certain situations, such as the absolutist decision that the intentional taking of a human life is always wrong, even in situations where the taking of one human life is required to save others. For example, a moral absolutist could argue against the termination of a pregnancy, even if it is necessary to save the mother's ...read more.

Middle

What is seen as morally acceptable in one culture may be frowned upon in another, for example it is the norm in some cultures for a man to take more than one wife, where as in most western cultures this is seen as immoral. Cultural relativism maintains that truth itself is relativist and all beliefs are equally valid. The cultural diversity of our world makes it difficult to establish universal morals which every culture should follow, and if the people of a particular culture are content then we should not impose our own morals on them, as we are each a product of our own culture, narrowing our views of what is right or wrong. The fact that the world is constantly changing also means that morals could be seen as relative according to their historical context, and because of this absolute morals are not likely to survive. Additionally, the controversy in meta-ethics makes moral absolutism unfeasible, as there is no universally accepted definition of right and wrong. What one person describes as right is always subject to disagreement amongst others, therefore it is impossible to agree on absolute moral principles which everyone should uphold. ...read more.

Conclusion

This worldwide awareness of right and wrong is exemplified in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, in which a set of rules for multiple nations to live by is established. In response to the idea of cultural relativism one could argue that moral absolutism enables us to effectively judge the actions of another culture, and if all cultures followed this absolute reasoning everyone would have a greater standard of moral living. Cultural relativism could be used as an excuse to act immorally and by having a set of moral absolutes this is made unjustifiable. Moreover, in many religions a set of moral absolutes is provided by the deity, therefore by obeying these fundamental principles of right or wrong a person is seen as living a morally good life in the eyes of God, and to go against them because of circumstances or consequences is sinful. As God issued the rules by which mankind should follow, they must be perfect since God is perfect. In conclusion, I agree with the statement that moral absolutism cannot be justified, as moral absolutism is too inflexible in it's principles to allow exceptions in extreme situations, such as where the life of a human being is concerned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Considering the claims of both absolutism and relativism, discuss the importance of situation ethics ...

    What is right for you, is the same for me and every other person in the world, unlike relativism the absolutist rules do not change for the situation, culture, religion, time or place. Immoral acts are intrinsically wrong, which means wrong in themselves, it isn't made wrong by anything, it

  2. What is the task of Kant's groundwork of the metaphysic of morals supposed to ...

    Leibniz argued that the ways we thought were embedded into our reason and not obtained through the world and that substance is obtained independently of appearance and is a result of substantial reality. He argued that monads (atoms) are building blocks of reality and used the principle of discernability to

  1. Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the ...

    His father is dead, his mother is lost to him, he is seeing ghosts, and he cannot trust those around him. Shakespeare's purpose in subverting the "moral universe" was to accentuate the unnaturalness of the acts and the appearance of the ghost.

  2. Moral Absolutism can Never be Justified. Discuss

    Here it is clear that moral absolutism is justified, as such a brutal form of execution is always wrong. As well as this, relativism allows one to create a culture within which murder is acceptable. It would be considered ethnocentric to condemn that culture, and so murder would continue.

  1. is abortion justified to save the mother's life

    However, in recent years two factors have challenged that traditional sanctity of life position. Western society has become far more critical of religious claims and advanced medical technology has blurred the boundaries between life and death. Some argue that the sanctity of life principle is out of date and that

  2. Abortion and Religions.

    Other churches that prohibit abortion are Jehovah's witnesses and the Evangelical Christian. Churches that do not prohibit abortion but also do not agree with it are Russian and Greek Orthodox Churches, Orthodox Judaism and Hinduism. These churches believe abortion can only be justified to save the women's life.

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    Surely it should be used to benefit the international community, especially poorer states, as we have obligations to human beings. One can also argue that it is often desirable for a state to be seen to act with humanitarian intervention, as it invariably provides a glow of self-importance.

  2. There are no moral absolutes, discuss.

    But when dug deeper, given the hardships of the Eskimos to survive and limited resources for survival, keeping every child puts the whole family at risk. So there is actually a fundamental moral value of preserving life that we share with the Eskimos.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work