• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can moral absolutism be justified?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Moral absolutism cannot be justified" Discuss There are arguments to suggest that moral absolutism cannot be justified as it is not a reasonable solution to any ethical situation. The theory of moral relativism upholds that there are no universally valid moral principles, opposing the theory of moral absolutism. Relative morals can change according to the situation, where as absolutism leaves no flexibility for certain situations. Some would put forward the view that examining an ethical situation from a teleological point of view is a greater means of deciding how to act than absolutism. Teleological ethics explain that actions are right or wrong depending on the outcome; the outcome of an action is not taken into account in the principles of moral absolutism therefore this could be seen as a weakness. Problems in disregarding the consequences of a moral action could arise in certain situations, such as the absolutist decision that the intentional taking of a human life is always wrong, even in situations where the taking of one human life is required to save others. For example, a moral absolutist could argue against the termination of a pregnancy, even if it is necessary to save the mother's ...read more.

Middle

What is seen as morally acceptable in one culture may be frowned upon in another, for example it is the norm in some cultures for a man to take more than one wife, where as in most western cultures this is seen as immoral. Cultural relativism maintains that truth itself is relativist and all beliefs are equally valid. The cultural diversity of our world makes it difficult to establish universal morals which every culture should follow, and if the people of a particular culture are content then we should not impose our own morals on them, as we are each a product of our own culture, narrowing our views of what is right or wrong. The fact that the world is constantly changing also means that morals could be seen as relative according to their historical context, and because of this absolute morals are not likely to survive. Additionally, the controversy in meta-ethics makes moral absolutism unfeasible, as there is no universally accepted definition of right and wrong. What one person describes as right is always subject to disagreement amongst others, therefore it is impossible to agree on absolute moral principles which everyone should uphold. ...read more.

Conclusion

This worldwide awareness of right and wrong is exemplified in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, in which a set of rules for multiple nations to live by is established. In response to the idea of cultural relativism one could argue that moral absolutism enables us to effectively judge the actions of another culture, and if all cultures followed this absolute reasoning everyone would have a greater standard of moral living. Cultural relativism could be used as an excuse to act immorally and by having a set of moral absolutes this is made unjustifiable. Moreover, in many religions a set of moral absolutes is provided by the deity, therefore by obeying these fundamental principles of right or wrong a person is seen as living a morally good life in the eyes of God, and to go against them because of circumstances or consequences is sinful. As God issued the rules by which mankind should follow, they must be perfect since God is perfect. In conclusion, I agree with the statement that moral absolutism cannot be justified, as moral absolutism is too inflexible in it's principles to allow exceptions in extreme situations, such as where the life of a human being is concerned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Moral Absolutism can Never be Justified. Discuss

    Here it is clear that moral absolutism is justified, as such a brutal form of execution is always wrong. As well as this, relativism allows one to create a culture within which murder is acceptable. It would be considered ethnocentric to condemn that culture, and so murder would continue.

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    This reverts back to Hobbes' social contract tradition. Hobbes believed that, in order to gain security, each person agrees with others to obey the state, provided others enter into such a contract as well. Hence the state is authorised to pursue the interests of its citizens, but not the interests of citizens of other states.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville, Va., and the author of Situation Ethics (1966) and Moral Responsibility (1967). This article has been adapted from his remarks during the dedication celebration of the new facility of St. Mark's Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah, on May 6,1973.

  2. How can we justify beliefs?

    Foundationalists in the past are known to differ from each other according the different types of propositions they regard as foundational. E.g. analytic philosophers of the twentieth century said that certain kinds of sensory reports can be known straight away.

  1. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    These proponents would not kill in self-defense. This position is not the same as the Socratic principle that it is better to suffer injustice than to do it; but it would be the same if we added the proposition that killing, even in self-defense and bona fide prevention, is unjust.

  2. is abortion justified to save the mother's life

    However, in recent years two factors have challenged that traditional sanctity of life position. Western society has become far more critical of religious claims and advanced medical technology has blurred the boundaries between life and death. Some argue that the sanctity of life principle is out of date and that

  1. Shakespeare's Purpose in Subverting the "Moral Universe" in Hamlet, Measure for Measure, and the ...

    The inversion of the "moral universe" takes place in the murders within the family, the 'unnaturalness' of the mother remarrying the uncle, and old friends turning traitor. The quote, "My two schoolfellows. Whom I shall trust as I will adders fangs," is a clear example of Hamlet's world.

  2. Is Christ a Kantian?

    Since if all men are liars such that no one will be keeping his promises, no one would also trust anyone anymore. Thus it becomes logically impossible for me to give any promise to anyone at all (for to give a promise implies logically that you expect another to trust

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work