• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider the application of Situation Ethics to a moral dilemma related to sexual ethics

Extracts from this document...


Consider the application of Situation Ethics to a moral dilemma related to sexual ethics. (6) There are many situations related to sexual ethics that I could choose to discuss but I shall choose that of homosexuality. Conventional Christian and Jewish teaching prohibits homosexual sex on the grounds that it is "unnatural" and does not allow the possibility for fertilisation to take place because the two partners are of the same gender. This controversial issue is often to be found on the front pages of newspapers. Today in Britain many members of the gay and lesbian community are campaigning for their relationships to be formally recognised under law in the same way that heterosexual couples may marry. ...read more.


The government and church would be forced to recognise that this is the most loving thing to do. Supporters of Situation Ethics believe that love is paramount, it is the most important consideration. If only love is intrinsically good it is impossible to argue that homosexual marriage and sex is immoral because the only absolute thing is that love is good. The Church and the government would also have to comply with "Love wills the neighbour's good whether we like it or not". This would mean that no matter whether the members of the church and ministers personally like the idea of homosexuality, they must act in the most loving way towards them. ...read more.


The most loving thing in the relationship would be to have homosexual sex because it would allow each partner to demonstrate their love for the other in a physical way. The Church claims that homosexual sex is wrong because it does not have the possibility of fertilisation taking place. However, if the most loving decision was always the most important consideration, as with Situation Ethics, then they would be obliged to permit it because although they may believe it is wrong to permit sex where there is no chance of fertilisation, this is not absolute. The only thing that is absolute is that love is right and the most important consideration. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Discuss the Relationship between law and morals. Consider how far the law seeks to ...

    How dominant must a value be before it is wrong to go against it? With so many conflicting moralities in our multicultural society, which of them when transgressed leads to sanctions? Rape is seen as morally wrong and is a crime, however adultery is morally wrong, and in the eyes

  2. Compare and contrast the application of two ethical theories to a moral dilemma. Discuss ...

    Sue Rodriguez is one such case. She was a rational, competent adult patient but chose to die. Sue Rodriguez knew her own mind and had an impressive reason for wishing to end her life. A very different case to this is that of Karen Ann Quinlan.

  1. What is Christian ethics?

    However, there is still a strong sense of following rules within most Christian denominations. Christians believe Natural Law is God-given and as such has authority in the formulation of an ethical code. Catholics also consider that conscience plays an important part in Christian ethical decision-making.

  2. "Virtue ethics is of little use when dealing with sexual ethics". Discuss - 35 ...

    However, in some ways this might be too restrictive and it can be difficult for people to balance these things whilst having a good quality of life. Therefore, utilitarianism might be better. In an ideal world utilitarianism wants the greatest number of people to be happy which in itself would promote the idea of justice in a relationship.

  1. meta ethics

    What we are doing when we use words such as 'Good'? Are we expressing our feelings of approval? Meta ethical philosophers try work out what we are doing when we use moral language, because if there is no agreement about the meaning of ethical language, then ethical debates are pointless and will never achieve anything.

  2. Business Ethics

    The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals campaign showed the slaughterhouse cruelty to animals. The co-founder of the Business Ethics group stated that this seemed unfair to McDonald's. Apparently animal cruelty is industry wide. However, others feel that McDonald's is the perfect company to stand up and lead the industry in changing this horrific truth.

  1. Situation Ethics

    Situation ethics allows for this. Fletcher sets out four working principles for situation ethics. 1. Pragmatism 2. Relativism 3. Positivism 4. Personalism Pragmatism is when the proposed course of action must actually work. Fletcher suggests that there is no point in acting if the deed is not working to the end, which must be love.

  2. Business Ethics

    Plato and Aristotle describe ideal human guided by its nature. Or Augustine tells that human is guided by God or his representative on earth, and that he won't act unethical or wrong. Utilitarianism is also considered in this category. John Mill looks for the greatest happiness for greatest number of people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work