• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically discuss Nietzsches idea that his new morality would be beyond good and evil.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

5/2/15 Critically discuss Nietzsche’s idea that his new morality would be beyond good and evil (45 marks) Modern Europe has had a revolt in its morals; strong free and happy action has now become labelled as immoral and corrupt. In the eyes of the revolutionaries, the herd, this brings them security and safety. The herd have managed to convince previous philosophers that this morality is a ‘given’, and as such these philosophers have attempted to find rational arguments to support it. Nietzsche argues that we should go beyond good and evil, that actions should not be judged as moral or immoral in themselves, into an era that is for the individual to make the best out of it, and themselves, as they possibly can. This so called ‘new morality’ is for the ‘higher’ men to ascend to greatness. Morality is a product of historical development. In the Pre moral era, 2an actions value or lack of value was determined by its consequences; the action itself was taken into consideration as little as its origin” §32. ...read more.

Middle

than to talk about intentions behind any single act. Is this agent a ‘higher’ or ‘lower’ man? Does he grow ever stronger and ever more powerful as he suffers? If he does then this is a sign of true ‘nobility’, for as Nietzsche said on The Discipline of Suffering: “don’t you know that this discipline alone has created all human greatness.” §255. Philippa Foot attempts to respond to Nietzsche by questioning why we should judge actions, not by their type, but by their relation to the nature of the person that does them. She brings up the examples of the mass murder and destruction caused by such totalitarian dictators as “Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot” and states that “what we have to be horrified at is what they have done.” There is no need to inquire into the psychology of these men to work out the moral quality of what they did. Be that as it may, if one were to examine the psychology of these men, one would find paranoid, estranged and desperate men. ...read more.

Conclusion

But, when these, so called ‘natural and fundamental’. Drives are enforced in modern morality they restrict and oppress. They create a “common green pasture of happiness for the herd” §44, but they, most importantly, deny life and growth. Take the Will to Power analogy of the Sipo Matador plant §258, in this analogy the ‘higher’ man, the plant in this case, uses the ‘lower’ men, the oak tree, as the “scaffolding” §258 – “to enable a select kind of creature (noble) to ascend to its higher task” §258. Overall then, moving beyond good and evil is necessary for the noble or ‘higher’ men to grow and fully utilise their Will to Power; via the exploitation of the ‘lower’ men. Nietzsche, one could argue, is not a supporter of “predatory” men; he would make this argument based on their psychology having precedent over their actions. Furthermore, Nietzsche views on ethics do not, in fact, provide a ‘new morality’. It is actually the absence of a moral code that. is so important. This allows strong individuals to exert their Will to Power and escape from the oppression of the herd. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    However, there is no international authority to enforce these rules, whereas a government has the authority within its state to enforce the rule against murder. One would hence be inclined to agree with Hobbes who upheld the view that where there is no regulation, there are no rules, not many people abide by rules which are totally unregulated.

  2. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    I have loved you' (John 15 : 12), the essence of the life of the Kingdom being love or agape (self-giving concern for others). Believers would claim that they believe in an objective lawgiver, a moral commander, who should be obeyed.

  1. Religion and Morality

    of free-will; and if God is omniscient and omnipotent he would know what decisions we are to make anyway and he would have the ability to stop us making the wrong ones. James Rachels concludes that no being like God can exist who requires us to abandon our moral autonomy is worth worshipping.

  2. Self-interest plays no part in genuine morality

    A maxim means ground rule or principle. So I treat everyone as I would like to be treated by them. His second principle is telling us to not treat people as means to an end. That means that we should not use anyone as our means to an end.

  1. Morality is rational and objective - discuss

    Acting out of inclination for Kant requires no thought. This is because almost any man is bound to do what he has been groomed to do by his culture in order to satisfy his conscience. Kofi comes from a society where he has been taught to share with and give to the hungry.

  2. Morals codes distinguish between order and chaos and good and evil.

    Therefore, the government did not take forceful action to outlaw this crime. The problem of knowledge arises because we know stealing is immoral, however; the sin of stealing has different levels of immorality, similar to the other unethical actions of humans.

  1. What are the vices and failings of contemporary New York revealed in 'Bonfire of ...

    The people in power want to "insulate, insulate, insulate,' and the alleged 'melting pot' is about as mixed as oil and water. This is the moral downside to the American Dream.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    The answer seems to have these two parts: 1. The value of life exceeds all other values. No other value overrides the value of life except possibly more life. 2. All lives are of equal value. No single life deserves priority over another, not even the most fit, hopeful, and developed over the most vegetative, wretched, or immature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work