• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the issue that it is pointless to analyse religious experience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Siân Aiken Discuss the issue the suggestion that it is pointless to analyse religious experience. In its nature religious experience is not a topic of religion that cannot be empirically scrutinised. However it is still questionable as to whether there is a sufficient enough cause to analyse religious experiences or is it, at its best just a mere suppositious delusion on the part of the individual. Many thinkers have taken religious experiences as facts and although many have spoken at great length about the subject, there are those who view that the analysis of religious experience as meaningless and pointless. Firstly, in definition religious experience is an unexplainable subjective experience of contact with what an individual believes to be a transcendent or supernatural being. The majority of religious believers hold the view that religious experience is genuinely an encounter with God or the Holy Spirit. Christian mysticism believes that although God converses and is personally involved with humanity, it is only through mystical religious experience that God’s message can truly be encountered. If what they claim has any shred of truth, then it would not only be meaningful to analyse religious experience but it would also be necessary, as God, the supreme creator is conversing his ‘wishes’ and ’commands’ directly to the human psyche. ...read more.

Middle

Moreover, what was more important to James, was not the analysis of the experience but the effects that it had on the person. So in this respect, James? position on the worth of analysing religious experience is mixed, as he believes not in the worth of the cause or the root of the experience (suggesting that he may see it as worthless), yet devised a way of categorising religious experience so as to make them more analysable. Ultimately, he advocated that the study of religious experience may be beneficial as giving greater strength to the effects that it may have on people on a tangible level, but he didn?t suggest that through analysis of religious experience one could derive an argument for the existence of God. James believed that there was a substantial difference between institutionalised religion and personal religion. To James the thought of loving God who at the same time was all powerful and creator of the universe is a confliction. There is a strong secular argument, for the worth of analysing experiences. Freud, Marx and Jung all commented on the on the existence of ?religious experiences? or religious illusions as Marx referred to them. ...read more.

Conclusion

After numerous studies it was revealed that they both showed signs of temporal lobe epilepsy, supporting perhaps the idea that the feeling of God and the unknown sensations are a biological function of our bodies. Richard Dawkins, who is vehemently opposed to religion and religious experience on the grounds of their being very little evidence for the existence of God in the first place. He states that even if a person did encounter a 'religious experience' there is nothing to suggest that it is religious based rather than any other phenomenon of biology or the unknown. However Dawkins allowed Dr. Persinger to stimulate his temporal lobe to see if he could stimulate the feeling of a religious experience; and Dawkins stated that although he felt shortness of breath, he felt no religious experience. In conclusion religious experience, although hugely meaningful for a large amount of people, ultimately it will always be subjective. You should not confuse objectivity and rational logic with the idea of mystical feeling and because of this the nature of religious experience should not be analysed. However, religious experience provides a great deal of meaning and benefits to those who believe in it and their responses and the good and the bad that can result is worthy of analysis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Religious language is meaningless, Discuss

    a road sign. A symbol is something that stands or is used in place of something else. Tillich held God could only be described using symbols but never literally. He said the symbol is transcending meaning something in it's own sense which points to something greater of higher in reality.

  2. Religious Experience - Edexel A2

    The third challenge is that of object related challenges, which challenges the existence of an object that was in the experience. If someone said that they had experienced the Loch Ness monster, the objection may be on the grounds of the object related challenge.

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    For example, if a religious person says 'God loves me' the question is whether the statement is scientific or not. If the religious claims are scientific then it must be possible that the religious claims could conflict with sense observations and thus be undermined.

  2. Assess whether religious experience demonstrates the existence of God?

    beneficial or because they felt pressurised by the group around them, also there could be irregularities with their testimony, maybe all cats in the world are extinct so seeing a cat is very unlikely, or what if one of the explorers said they saw a black cat and another thought they saw a ginger cat.

  1. "Plato does not value experience enough" Discuss

    said, none more so than in the case of Plato, where it was his experience of the death of Socrates, that drove him to a life of Philosophy and toward the discovery of the Forms. Plato however, would argue that we do not need experience to have knowledge, as we

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    Emotivism will not tell you how to live a moral life, but simply helps us understand moral statements: as action guiding and as conveying certain attitudes. This view says that when we talk about ?good? and ?bad? we are simply expressing emotional states of approval and disapproval.

  1. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    So according to logical positivists, as religious propositions can?t be analysed using empirical methods, they are then meaningless. The falsification principle is another response to the verification principle, it maintains a similar approach to it. Many philosophers regard the falsification principle as a more serious challenge to the meaningfulness of religious language, Anthony Flew developed the principle in the 1950s.

  2. Evaluate the claim that corporate religious experience is no more than an illusion

    and pragmatism (James was a pragmatist and believed the truth was not fixed; it changes as the things of value to us change. Observing the effects of religious experience should convince us that there is truth to be found in religion).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work