• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument is an 'a posteriori argument'. Therefore, the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument, are the strengths and weaknesses of 'a posteriori' reasoning. 'A posteriori reasoning is 'arguing to a conclusion from our experience of the world'. The most famous expression of the Cosmological Arguments is found in what are known as Saint Thomas Aquinas' 'Five Ways,' seen as proofs of God's existence but since 'a posteriori' reasoning can only offer us probability, and not conclusive proof, then we need to clarify what exactly these arguments are attempting to do and how much do they work doing what they are actually trying to do. There are two forms of the Cosmological argument. The first of these is the 'Kalam Argument', also known as the 'First Cause Argument'. This is the simplest expression of the Cosmological Argument. ...read more.


There is a difference between the Kalam and the Contingency Arguments. The Contingency arguments (arguments such as the third of Aquinas' Five Ways) seek to establish the dependence of the Universe on God now. They seek to show there is something necessary on which the contingent Universe depends. The Kalam argument, by contrast, seeks to establish the Universe has a beginning and that this beginning was caused. The first premise of the Kalam Argument reads, 'Whatever begins to exist has a cause.' This view relies on us interpreting current data (data available to us). We therefore, need to make a judgement on this data to see if the Universe is uncaused or if it has a cause, which has not yet been figured out. Even if the Universe is not an infinite regress i.e. it has a cause, then this cause is uncaused. This leaves us with a problem, this problem being that there cannot be an ultimate explanation. The second premise reads, 'The Universe began to exist'. ...read more.


By saying this, you are arguing against the leap from contingency to necessity that Saint Thomas Aquinas takes. This argument is summed up, in a book called 'The Puzzle of God' by Peter Vardy, by saying, "One cannot move from individual causes to a claim that the totality of all has a cause". Aquinas tries to arrive at necessary existence with his third way. This was questioned as to whether there was any such thing, because it is logical to say of anything that it may or may not exist. In conclusion, the strengths and weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument ultimately depend on what we see it as attempting to do. If we see it as a proof, it fails because 'a posteriori reasoning' can never arrive at conclusive proof because of experience. However, if we see it as a 'probability argument' (does it make God more rather than less probable) then it has a value, as it makes belief in God reasonable, which, I think, was Aquinas' intention. Josh Bradshaw ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    imperfect personalities who reason, emote, act, communicate, etc., God also possesses analogous qualities in perfection. Also, Aquinas argued, that which is found in the ultimate cause must also be found in the offspring, a line of reasoning that led to the Fifth Way.10 The Cosmological argument is developed around a

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    On these grounds, the Kalam argument (a version of the Cosmological argument), as developed by al-Kindi and al-Ghazali, concludes that as the universe came into being, it must therefore have a cause. Both Aquinas (in his second way) and F.C.

  1. Outline the Cosmological Argument-

    But it may be held that all things in creation were created or formed out of something which came before it, but there is no sufficient reason to suppose that the whole universe must have had a beginning, the big bang theory is a theory and who started the big

  2. Deontology has many strengths but it is justifiable to reject it. Clarify and assess ...

    If they are to be persuaded by a deontological ethical theory it would have to be a secular one. In this respect, Kantian Ethics may present a more suitable candidate. Immanuel Kant's Formalism, another well-known deontological theory of ethics, has been characterised as "a Divine Command Theory without the Divine", because of the similarities between the two theories.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    This first cause was God. In his Third Way, Aquinas identified the contingency of matter in the universe. Everything comes into existence and later ceases to exist, so he concluded that there must have been a time where nothing existed.

  2. Outline cosmological argument presented by Aquinas and discuss strengths and weaknesses.

    God is a necessary being and if he didn't exist first then there would always of been nothing. This is another argument that could be believable if it was more developed. Once again it does not give any insight into why God was present first, there is no real proof or proper evidence.

  1. St Thomas Aquinas and the Cosmological Argument

    Necessity and Contingency * There is no reason to assume that there need to have been a time when there was once nothing. There could be overlapping chains of contingent beings, so that there was never a period. There is no logical impossibility in this, there is no contradiction intrinsic to the concept of an endless chain of contingent beings.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    Aquinas makes an ontological assumption on the concept of causation, which were later greatly criticised by Hume. As he claims that as we have no experience of causation, it is likely to be something our minds imposes upon the external world, for example, the white snooker ball does not cause

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work