• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the key features of the cosmological argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Patrick M-B Examine the key features of the cosmological argument (9) The Cosmological Argument has several forms, but is fundamentally a proof for the existence of the God of classical theism. It seeks answer to the human need for answers to questions such as "why is there something rather than nothing?" and "How can the features of the universe be explained?" It is an a posteriori argument, meaning that it is based on our experience of the world around us. The cosmological argument reaches the conclusion that God is necessary being (self causing - not dependant on anything), and that he is the complete and adequate explanation for the universe. St. ...read more.

Middle

In a similar way the second way states that everything has to be moved by something, as nothing can be its own cause because this is a logical impossibility. Thus a chain of movers is built up with each items movement resting on the movement of the item before it. Since the Cosmological Argument rejects infinity, this chain of movers must have been started by something, because of course our experience as humans, all things have a cause. God therefore is the first cause of all that exists, ie the first mover. Aquinas's third way is the Argument from contingency and necessity. This argument states that things are contingent - in other words reliant on other 'things'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Leibnitz then goes on to say that nothing can't turn itself into something (since by the very nature of nothing it has no ability to cause itself to change), and our very existence shows that nothing did turn into something, there must have been some external force which caused it to do so. The final key version of the Cosmological Argument comes from Richard Swinburne. Swinburne says that God is quite simply the easiest explanation for everything. He bases his ideas on the fact that if a single sufficient explanation for can be found, then there is no gain in exploring other more complex explanations. Swinburne expresses this in the following quote: "if we can explain the many bits of the universe by one simple being which keeps them in existence, we should do so even if we cannot explain the existence of that simple being." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    He claimed that in one possible world there exists a being with maximal greatness. He then concluded that this being only has maximal greatness if he exists in all possible worlds. Additionally there were modern philosophers who were against the Ontological argument for instance Bertrand Russell.

  2. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    human may go some way to making such a weakness obsolete because as it focuses on the person and not the action it may mean that someone may commit a murder but instead of looking at the action they only focuses on the person which is dire, if you are

  1. What are the key ideas of the cosmological argument?

    This, the philosophers Leibniz, Aquinas and Craig stated is god, uncaused due to different rules in a different cosmos. B. Identify the main strengths of this argument. This Cosmological Argument has much strength, one of which is the importance of the empirical evidence.

  2. Explain the Key features of the cosmological argument

    Thomas Aquinas proposed five ways that "proved" the existence of God, the first three ways are Cosmological Arguments the fourth is a form of ontological argument and the fifth is a form of a teleological argument. The first way, the unmoved mover is formally expressed as 'everything that is in

  1. What are the key ideas of the Cosmological argument for the creation of God?

    This first cause was god. The third way is the argument from contingent beings to a necessary being. Contingent beings could easy exist in a different way if things had happened differently. E.g. I am sitting at an Advent computer but if my parents had taken a different career path

  2. i) Outline the key features of the cosmological argument ii) To what extent is ...

    Aquinas concludes that this uncaused causer is God. In addition to that, Aquinas argues that the cause of the universe is a necessary being as opposed to a contingent one. The first of his third way is the idea of the contingent being.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work