• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Adaeze Ifeacho Weaknesses and strengths of Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham, the key philosopher of utilitarianism saw happiness as the ultimate goal of existence, and the only thing desirable. The term utilitarianism is derived from the Latin word ?utils? meaning useful. It is a normative theory concerned with the usefulness of our actions. Whether an action will produce pleasure or diminish pain. The first of many strengths is the fact that, it is based on rational principles. The late 18th and 19th century saw that, morality was not just based with the belief of God. This is a strength because, Bentham used his experience and reasoning to work out how humans ought to behave. Another strength of utilitarianism is the democratic principle. This principle is often known as the common sense approach because, people would rather be happy than miserable. The majority are considered here because; it promotes general happiness and opposes individual pursuit. For example, if everyone is in support of the death penalty, it will have to be passed into the law because, it brings happiness to the majority. ...read more.


Utilitarianism is convenient because, it does not focus on the motive of the action but the results that the action will achieve. If it brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number (the majority) then the decision is morally good. If the murder of a criminal will bring will reduce the burglary incidents in a neighbourhood, thereby bringing happiness to the majority, then it is morally good. However, utilitarianism has its weaknesses so far as the strengths. Philosophers such as J.S.Mill disagree with some of the conclusions. One main problem of this theory is that, pleasure cannot be easily quantified. The hedonic calculus is not as straight forward as it seems. Different pleasures and pains cannot be easily quantified. The pleasure of seeing children grow up into adults cannot be compared with the pleasure of eating a chocolate bar. Likewise, the seven criteria of the hedonic calculus prove to be irrelevant. In addition to that, the prediction of consequences cannot be easily predicted. The main fact is that, human beings are not predictable so does our outcomes of any action. ...read more.


Despite the weaknesses, Utilitarianism has proved popular and useful in the centuries since its original formation. It remains persuasive due to its common sense approach to ethics. ii) Is it justifiable to reject Utilitarianism? The ethical theory so like many others has posed some difficulties. It falls into the naturalistic fallacy because; the theory assumes that goodness and pleasure is the same thing. This is not always the case. Bentham?s theory makes no allowance for personal relationships. If your father and a scientist with a cure for cancer were drowning, the utilitarian response would be to save the scientist. This action is justified if it produces the greatest happiness to the greatest number. Utilitarianism therefore refuses to allow special responsibilities to our loved ones to override our actions which increase the sum total of human happiness, due to its democratic nature. All emotional attachments must be out aside to do the right thing. On purely philosophical grounds, Bentham?s view of human nature is essentially passive: people are ?pushed? about or controlled by the search for pleasure and the avoidance of pain. Hence, there are no ?bad? motives or ?moral? deficiencies; there are only bad calculations regarding pleasure and pain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    For example not killing a specific person will prevent sadness for that person's family. Opening the door for the lady carrying a box will make her happy. It uses the 'greater good' as we as humans like to achieve the best from anything and expect the end result to generate the most happiness.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the teleological, deontological and hybrid systems of ethics ...

    do is ask oneself whether their action will achieve this Priary precept. If the action upholds the Primary precepts it is morally right. However, the Deontological system has weaknesses, mainly as it does not have the strengths of the teleological system.

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    This form of utilitarianism is more closely associated with John Stuart Mill. I must obey the rule even if it doesn't lead to the greatest pleasure or happiness for me. A rule utilitarian will maintain that I must always drive on the left hand-side of the road in the UK,

  2. Explain how Benthams version of Utilitarianism may be used to decide the right cause ...

    life of the child as they are considered to be innocent, however with Bentham's theory you should do the maximum amount of good for the maximum amount of people, which means you should save the man. By saving the one man you then save thousands, the action of letting the

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    He argued that the result of this was that we entered a system in which the strong were now oppressed by the weak, going against the natural order of things, in which he argued the exploitation and oppression of the weak by the strong was inherent.

  2. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    After all, the theory does correct the apparent selfishness of ethical egoism and that when we calculate the effects of an action, no one person can claim special privileges and set aside the happiness of others in the pursuit of their own.

  1. Analyse the key strengths for the arguments of the existence of God based on ...

    However, although there may seem to be similarities, if all the experiences are that of God surely they would be more similar, for example why don't Hindus see the Virgin Mary? The argument from quantity is also known as the cumulative argument whereby there are simply too many experiences recorded

  2. Deontology has many strengths but it is justifiable to reject it. Clarify and assess ...

    This challenge casts doubt on whether following the Divine Command Theory is really how God wants us to live. In regards to practicality, this form of deontology is not workable for atheists who, as they do not believe in God, see no reason to follow His commandments, and therefore do not find this argument persuasive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work