• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Explain Bentham's Utilitarianism" and Act Utilitarianism has immoral consequences Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


1. Explain Bentham?s Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy based on the utility, or usefulness of an action. This philosophy is rooted in hedonism, or seeking pleasure. Hedonism can be traced back to Ancient Greece, with philosophers like Aristotle writing about ?eudaimonia? or happiness being the highest good. Some people would argue that hedonism is an egoist theory as it only considers the outcome for the individual, Thomas Hobbes thought that mankind was inherently selfish and that the only reason why we behave is because we have a ?social contract? and understand that we must surrender our free will to the state in order to survive. Utilitarianists would agree that man is motivated by pleasure however Utilitarianism also considers what is best for society, as it focuses on the greatest good for the greatest number. They believe in a social contract but think instead it allows us to be free and get along with each other. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory meaning that it is concerned with the outcome of the action rather than an intrinsic value of the action itself. This means it is relative and dependent on the situation. Joseph Fletcher was a philosopher who proposed situation ethics as a moral philosophy. ...read more.


or it could cause huge unrest for decades to come, and it is incredibly hard to predict which one it will be. Bentham?s Utilitarianism is known as Act Utilitarianism, which means it examines the utility of individual acts completely separate from each other. Some people think that this theory is too relative as it could allow for immoral acts to take place as long as they produced enough happiness. John Stuart Mill created the idea of Rule Utilitarianism to solve these problems. Jeremy Bentham thought that all pleasures were equal saying that ?pushpin is as good as poetry.? Pushpin was a game played in pubs at the time, and so Bentham thinks that as long as it brings happiness it is as noble a pursuit as studying poetry. John Stuart Mill disagreed and referred to this idea as a ?Swine Ethic? meaning that something could be justified because the majority of people did it, rather than the act itself being good. 1. ?Act Utilitarianism has immoral consequences? Discuss. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning it decides upon the morality of an action purely based on the outcome of that action. The hedonic calculus works out what is the ?greatest good for the greatest number.? Bentham believed that this idea would bring about happiness, and believed that morality was based purely upon happiness. ...read more.


It makes sense logically that killing this amount of people would never be considered moral by a Utilitarian. On the other hand, some would say that society has a duty to help minority groups and so they should not be treated the same as everybody else because the people who are privileged do not need the help. In Bentham?s utopian view of society, however, this would not be necessary as the inequality would not exist in the first place. In conclusion, Act Utilitarianism provides the most moral outcome if used correctly. It allows us to take outcomes that reduce pain and consider them moral. However it is easy to see that Tyranny of the majority could come about using the calculus, as a small group of people could be negatively affected but because of their size this would not outweigh the good for the majority. Rule Utilitarianists like J.S Mill would argue that a rule-based morality would solve this problem, as it says that an action is good if it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good. By not allowing exceptions to the rule it may prevent issues like the Tyranny of the majority, but like all absolutist theories, it could still lead to immoral acts due to the person who makes the decisions about the rules. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarian's may have to face, as is

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    and its citizens, bringing us to the conclusion that cosmopolitan morality does not exist. So can humanitarian intervention be justified at all, even by the ideal of cosmopolitan morality? Michael Walzer argues that it can be justified when "it is a response, with reasonable expectations of success, to acts that

  1. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? ...

    Utilitarianism is very hard to put into practise, Can anyone argue that one persons pleasure is more valid then anothers? Or that one person's problem is more important than someone elses? Although some argue that quantity can be measured ( Bentham's Hedonic Calculus)

  2. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    be measured in seven ways these are, * Intensity * Duration * Certainty or uncertainty( having a headache pill will certainly relieve pain- if you place a bet it you may win and be happy, but you may also lose and be unhappy)

  1. I will be discussing John Stewart Mill theory on utilitarianism. Then I will point ...

    He would be risking your life to maximize his overall happiness. Most of the examples to maximize overall happiness have someone or something's rights or duties being violated. The person that needed the new heart rights were violated because the surgeon went to the baseball game.

  2. Outline the main features of Utilitarianism andExamine critically criticisms that have been offered against ...

    Next the Utilitarian would save the pregnant woman as there would be a great richness and purity in saving the life of the young child who has the probability of a long and happy life ahead, while the extent of the pleasures experienced by two people is a clear likelihood.

  1. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Human experience over the course of history does rely itself on freedom. If determinism is true, why should people bother deliberating about what to do or deciding and choose seriously? Everyone's thought and action must be inevitable; nobody really has any choice about anything because we are all helpless products of blind forces, which have made us what we are.

  2. Explain Utilitarianism

    and purity (how free from pain?). Whatever is good or bad can be measured in a quantitative way. Bringing about the greatest pleasure is more important then abiding to rules or laws. For example, in ?Trolleology?, David Edmonds formulates a dilemma.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work