• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain different views about what people mean when they call a moral decision 'wrong'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain different views about what people mean when they call a moral decision 'wrong'. In Ethics it is very important to understand the language used and the ideas behind it. There are many different opinions about what the word 'wrong' means and this helps to explain why there are many different views about what people mean when they call moral decision wrong. The dictionary definition of the word 'wrong' in the Oxford English Dictionary is an adjective meaning 'not correct or true', something that is 'unjust, dishonest or immoral', or 'something contrary to ethics or morality'. It is very hard to define 'wrong' completely and accurately and with no doubt or argument. Ethics is study of wrong and right and people's moral choices and how they justify their points of view. Ethical language is the language people use to convey their points of view in a moral discussion. It is used to describe how right and wrong are perceived. There are many different types of ethical language and each has a slightly different approach to it. Through ethical language different people interpret the word 'wrong' in different ways to try and define and explain the different perceptions of the word. ...read more.

Middle

The Protestant Church however accepts a civil divorce as an end to a marriage and allows remarry in church. Another example of differing views on what is wrong in different religions is in the Islamic religion compared with western religions. The Muslim religion states that it is wrong for a woman not to be covered up when out in public and it is also wrong for a woman to read from the Torah during her period. These situations in other religions would not be considered wrong but in Islamic cultures it is seen as extremely wrong as well as disrespectful. These situations can also be seen as social issues and in the idea of relativism a situation is wrong if it goes against the society in which they live in laws and ideals. Peer groups and a person's upbringing will also have an affect on what someone will consider 'wrong' because as humans we adapt to the people around us to 'fit in'. Therefore the opinions of people close to us will have an impact on our opinions as to what is acceptable and what is unacceptable or 'wrong'. Religion despite sometimes giving rise to moral dilemmas also provides the believers which a standard to which they should aim to keep and a set of rules which help to give moral guidelines about what is right and wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

The effects of a moral decision can have an impact on a wide range of people; including individuals, their friends and family, and the community or society as a whole. There are a great variety of views which people could have when they call a moral decision 'wrong', and what people want to mean when they use the word 'wrong' can depend of a wide range of factors. This therefore allows for many different meanings and definitions of the word 'wrong' and these can be influenced by a number of things from a persons religion to what is seen as the norm in the society in which they live and the people they are influenced by such as friends and family. Intuition, which is the instinctive feeling which helps a person decide if a moral decision is 'wrong' or 'right' within themselves will also play a part in what people mean when they say a moral decision is wrong. Due to human nature, free will and factors which can affect peoples judgement I believe people will always have differing opinions about what is 'wrong' when it comes to moral decisions and therefore it is very hard to come up with one definition of 'wrong' which can be applied to all moral decisions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    which states "In Sacred Scripture homosexual acts are condemned as a serious depravity and even presented as a sad consequence of rejecting God. This judgment of scripture does not, of course, permit us to conclude that all those who suffer from this anomaly are personally responsible for it, but it

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    idea that the quality of conscience must be relate to the quality of knowledge the conscience is presented with, accounts for a 'potentially infallible' conscience while admitting basic flaws in the Universe. Cardinal Newman differs from all of the previous scholars in that he believes that the starting point for all conscience is God.

  1. Utilitarianism is unjust

    true hedonist to see whether or not there are other intrinsic values besides pleasure. Harwood argues that utilitarianism requires us to enter the machine and spend our entire lives in it. However, if we are in the experience machine we are not maximizing the most happiness for the most people as a true utilitarian would do.

  2. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    Thus, it states that she is a teenage girl who is pregnant against her wishes and, because of the intermediate proposition of women only carrying a child to full term when she has chosen to be pregnant, the girl's situation goes against the moral code.

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    He feels we are duty bound to follow these obligations. In reference to euthanasia, he would be against it, as he does not believe euthanasia to be a moral obligation. Kant believes that we just do know what to do because he said we have categorical imperatives, which are a set of immutable rules that we all follow.

  2. Situation Ethics and Moral Decision Making.

    However, a situationist would permit an abortion as a ?lesser evil?, as it would be the most living course of action. This example itself highlights the strong contrasts between Situation Ethics and legalistic approaches, and why many disagree with theories such as Natural Law.

  1. Capital Punishment - analyse the views of Ernest van den Haag and Hugo Adam ...

    Bedau stands on the other side of the capital punishment issue. His arguments try to prove why the position of abolition is better. In respects to the same issues that Haag presents I will discuss Bedau?s arguments Both Haag and Bedau discuss how it is possible that with capital punishment innocent people deemed guilty are executed.

  2. Explore the moral issues surrounding the right to a child.

    Finally Kantian ethics would follow the categorical imperatives which concerns treating peoples as an ends in themselves, so if you consider the fetus to be a person, embryo destruction would be wrong and viewed as murder.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work