• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Mills Version of Utilitarianism. Mills version of utilitarianism is morally unacceptable. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Part A Explain Mill's Version of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a universal teleological system that calls for the maximisation of goodness in society. Utilitarianism itself is a consequential theory, i.e. the goodness of an action is judged purely by the consequences of the action. It is commonly understood as being a hypothesis that assesses and promotes moral actions on the basis of their outcome using the maxim, 'the greatest happiness for the greatest number'. Utilitarianism begins with David Hume but comes into the classical era with Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. They were struggling for social reform and tried to make the law serve human needs and interests. An example of utilitarianism is in the bible. Caiphas advises the Jewish council to hand Jesus over to the Romans for the good of then nation. Mill maintained that the well being of the individual was of the greatest importance and that happiness is the most effectively gained when the individuals are free to pursue their own ends. ...read more.

Middle

We have all got the potential to reach the pleasure o the mind, but it is more difficult to get to as we are tempted by the rest of the body. The pleasures of the rest of the body are more tempting that the pleasure of the mind, even though the pleasure of the mind are easier to get to, the pleasure of the mind last longer. The pleasures of the mind however are much more pure and the extent of the mind is better. J.S Mill argued that utilitarianism fitted in with Christianity. He said there was a positive place for rules in society. He said that truth was the greatest rule for society, the greatest way to secure happiness for society. He didn't agree with the hedonic calculus which is way of telling if an action will cause you more pain of pleasure. Part B Mills version of utilitarianism is morally unacceptable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Once this is recognized, supporters argue that utilitarianism becomes a much more complex, and rich, moral theory, and may align much more closely with our moral intuitions. Since utilitarian's judge all actions by their ability to maximize good consequences, any harm to one individual can always be justified by a greater gain to other individuals. This is true even if the loss for the one individual is large and the gain for the others is marginal, as long as enough individuals receive the small benefit. Thus, utilitarian's deny that individuals have inviolable moral rights. This seems problematic to many critics of utilitarianism, one of whom notes that according to utilitarianism there is "nothing intrinsically wrong with sacrificing an important individual interest to a greater sum of lesser interests. That assumption is retained in the foundations of the theory, and it remains a source of moral concern. I there fore think that utilitarianism is morally unacceptable as it is hard to see if it an action does cause pleasure for the majority. ?? ?? ?? ?? Louise Hempton Ethics TG1 Miss Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine the key features of utilitarianism and its strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    This would prove a problem for a utilitarian because they have to consider how many people would be made happy by saving either their mum or the scientist. If they were to save the scientist then millions of people could be cured of cancer and this is generally what a

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of utilitarianism, what are the main problems of ...

    Act utilitarianism maintains that the best action is the one that always leads to the greatest good for the greatest number in certain situations. For example, if in a certain situation where lying will create the greatest amount of pleasure, lying is what one must do.

  1. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism unacceptable? ...

    I feel it is not enough to simply rely on good motives because only the consequences of an action have a real affect on human wellbeing. Utilitarianism depends upon the weighing up of happiness and pain to produce the maximum happiness.

  2. Explain the main weaknesses of Benthams version of Utilitarianism. Does Mills version of Utilitarianism ...

    Discuss. Unlike Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill is classed by many as being a Rule Utilitarian. The main differences between Bentham's thinking and Mill's is that Bentham's is a quantitative thinking and Mill's is qualitative. This means that Mill considers the quality of a consequence, as opposed to Bentham who considers the quantity of good pleasurable outcome in a consequence.

  1. Outline and explain the ethical theory of utilitarianism b) ...

    In Bentham's theory it is reasonable and logical to conclude to link morality and the pursuit of happiness and the avoidance of pain, as this is more of a common sense system, which would clearly receive a lot of support, even in the modern day, as it is applicable to real life situations.

  2. Utilitarianism. Identify the main problems of Utilitarianism. To what extent do these make Utilitarianism ...

    Mill stated that higher pleasures were a lot more valuable than the basic ones that Bentham refers to. Thomas Carlyle accuses Bentham of referring to one 'swinish pleasures' and therefore it was a pig philosophy. 'It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to

  1. Capital Punishment

    Therefore the line from the bible... "But if there is harm, then you shall pay life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand..."18 is taken upon by the victims as for each crime that has taken place, the criminal shall pay in exchange in the form of punishment.

  2. Explain Utilitarianism

    So, when Christians were fed to the lions by the Romans, despite the majority involved getting the pleasure of watching Christians being eaten, this is a low, animalistic pleasure, that is outweighed by the higher pleasure of the minority, the Christians, in wanting to survive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work