• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Plato's use of the metaphor of the shadows in his analogy of the cave.

Extracts from this document...


Elena Solaro 12e 1) Explain Plato's use of the metaphor of the shadows in his analogy of the cave The works of Plato had such a profound effect on the world of philosophical thought and debate, that he is often referred to as 'the father of philosophy'. Born in Athens around 428 BC, Plato was the student of another great thinker, Socrates. He had a keen interest in mathematics and physics, considering them to be the key to understanding the universe. Plato also appreciated the logical reasoning and reliable certainties of these subjects, and on the basis of these principles he began to doubt and challenge what our senses perceive as reality. From his observations, he deduced one of his major concepts: the Theory of Forms, or Ideas. Plato said that questions such as 'what is beauty?' or 'what is honesty?' cannot be properly answered, as human language cannot properly define them. Concepts such as these are abstract, in that, we cannot see or feel 'beauty' or 'honesty'; we cannot hold them in our hands. All that we can do is point to examples of these concepts, such as beautiful flowers, or honest people. However, we will each have a different opinion on what is beautiful. What one person considers beautiful, another may consider repulsive. ...read more.


The philosopher discovers the truth, yet his friends will not accept his incredible ideas, because our world does indeed seem real, and it is far simpler to believe our senses. The sun represents the Form of the Good from which all the other Forms receive their perfection and very existence, much in the same way that everything in our world ultimately owes its existence to the sun. In conclusion, Plato came up with his analogy to explain his ideas, which he did by using each part of the story to represent part of his theory. As I have mentioned, the shadows are symbolic of the objects we take as real in our world. However, by making these objects shadows, Plato illustrates his belief that they are not real. They are just imperfect silhouettes or outlines of something greater and more perfect, which we cannot see: they are reflections of the Forms. 2) On what grounds might Plato's understanding of human reasoning be criticised? As with every philosophical theory, Plato's Theory of Forms can be questioned and disputed, because there is no evidence to prove its verity. Plato acknowledged the criticisms of his contemporaries, yet he refused to accept or even consider them, remaining steadfast in his conviction that he had discovered the ultimate truth about human reality and existence. ...read more.


There is no real evidence to support Plato's heavenly realm, we cannot see it or feel it, so how can it be real? The realm of the Forms seems to be a fairly hazy concept to the average person, as well as quite a difficult one to interpret, particularly as Plato's dialogues do not go into much detail about it. A man called William of Ockham devised a theory, which stated that if we are presented with two explanations of the same phenomenon, both equally supported by evidence, we will almost certainly choose to believe the simplest one. It stands to reason that we would rather trust our senses, which we can actually feel, than an unnatural realm of Forms, which seems incomprehensible to us, as we will never be able to experience it. To conclude, there have been many criticisms of Plato's theory of Forms over the years. Each claims that they can disprove Plato's ideas, which were certainly not one hundred percent foolproof or infallible in the first instance. Much of Plato's theory is unclear, for example, if it is found outside of our time and space, then where exactly is the realm of the forms? What does it look like, and more importantly, what do the Forms really look like? Considering this, it is hardly surprising that Plato's ideas have been hotly contested and criticised by his contemporaries as well as the philosophers who have studies his works over the centuries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    How can society benefit if most individuals are at a disadvantage as to developing their own unique skills? Plato classifies people in three groups, as gold, the best members of society fit to be guardians, as silver members fit to be soldiers, and the common herd of brass and iron, fit only to be the producers.

  2. The Allegory of the Cave - Plato was a Philosopher who used a story ...

    Eventually the prisoner learns that the fire and the puppets are reality and the images were merely shadows of the puppets created by the firelight.

  1. Plato used the analogy of the cave to criticise the unphilosophical and to 'get ...

    Plato would not wish to hold to such a view, but he is unclear as to the extent the Forms can be reduced. Is there a form for the species 'humanity' or a form for each individual person? What is there is one form for the whole planet?

  2. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    2. One must be active in living virtuously 3. One must have external goods. Happiness according to Aristotle is a public not a private affair, so whom you share this happiness with is of great importance. The city-states of ancient Greece were tightly knit communities. In politics Aristotle says we cannot fully realize our potential as humans outside the

  1. Plato's Theory of Forms

    This solves the first, ethical, problem. Splitting existence up into two realms also solves the problem of permanence and change. We perceive a different world, with different objects, through our mind than we do through the senses.

  2. Explain Plato's metaphor of shadows in the analogy of the cave.

    the shadows, even if he did not accept the reality of the objects, as he would see that the shadows are cast from something, whether he believes the shadows are reality or the objects themselves, he can still see a degree deeper into the situation than those unable to see

  1. The "Allegory of the Cave" represents an extended metaphor in which human beings perceive ...

    Because his eyes acclimated to the sunshine, he can only see the true forms of things. Only knowledge of the Forms constitutes real knowledge while shadows don't show anything. 4. The prisoner is like that of Socrates because the prisoner has to seek out and assimilate a vast array of

  2. The analogy of the cave teaches us that in life people only like to ...

    Everyone begins at the cognitive level of imagination. We each begin our lives deep within in the cave, with our head and legs bound, and education is the struggle to move us far out of the cave as possible. However not everyone can make it all the way out, this is what makes everyone different, different out looks

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work