• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the different ways in which 'right' and 'wrong' are used in metaethics

Extracts from this document...


Charles Johnson 20 January 2003 Explain the different ways in which 'right' and 'wrong' are used in metaethics In metaethics, the terms "right" and "wrong" show someone's feelings about a certain moral issue. Metaethics explores the meaning and function of moral language. Meta-ethicists explore what, if anything is meant by terms such as "good", "bad", "right" and "wrong". A meta-ethical question is "What do we mean when we say that sex before marriage is good?" One type of meta-ethics is ethical naturalism. This has the basic ideas that ethical terms can be defined or explained using the 'natural' terms that are used to define mathematics or science, and also that morals could be based on the same kind of observation of the world as used in science. Ethical naturalists say that moral truths are like numbers or chemical properties, and people use logic to conclude ethical truths. They will conclude that something is "wrong" from observation and analysis. This means that moral facts according to ethical naturalism aren't views or opinions (the persons feelings such as likes or dislikes). ...read more.


W. D Ross said in a moral dilemma, there are various duties or obligations that we hold that are apparent. We should follow a particular duty (the 'prima facie') unless a higher duty exists that compels us to pursue that instead. Ross also differentiated between thing that are right to do, and things that are good to do. To help an old lady across the road is the right action -the right thing to do- but if you are just doing it to gain praise from your minister who is also walking along the road, then it isn't good, because the motivation or intention isn't good. Emotivism and David Hume say that sentiment is the source of right and wrong. If you decide to help someone, you do so because of feelings, not reason. Hume believed that there was a common feeling for each other's welfare, and we all have a capacity for compassion, which has nothing to do with reason. He said you couldn't go from a factual statement (an 'is') ...read more.


The judgement that something is red is descriptive because it describes, but also it is universal because it applies to anything similar. Moral statements also hold this principle too- seen in the N. Testament ("do unto others what you would have done unto yourself"), and in Kant's teachings ("Act only on the maxim through which you can and at the same time will that it should become a universal law.") Hare argued that moral statements have this universalisability, and it is in our interest to prescribe the advice to others, as we would want to have such advice given to ourselves. In conclusion I can see that meta-ethics sees 'right' and 'wrong' in many different ways. Naturalists used reason to justify moral statements such as ones including "right" and "wrong", Intuitionists used a special moral sense to discover the correct moral statements, Emotivists denied the existence of moral facts as being meaningful in any way beyond personal opinion, and Prescriptivists produced an ethical theory that sought to make moral statements objective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain and discuss the four major theories of meta-ethics; Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitionism and Prescriptivism.

    Rachels rejects emotivism as he believes moral judgements require reasons or else they are arbitrary. Others would say that emotivism does not have many followers, as it is simply a discussion of opinions, whether it's a discussion or a shouting match of views.

  2. "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they ...

    Or you can do nothing, with the result that both lives will soon come to an end. What shall you do?" (The Philosophy Gym, Stephen Law, p184) The answer to the utilitarian is very simple. He/she believes that you should kill the already dying cancer patient, as his life is

  1. Explain Kant(TM)s moral argument for the existence of God and Kant was wrong to ...

    They are: freedom; a given person is free to commit a moral action without obligation or obstruction, immortality; despite moral actions not being rewarded in this life we must have immortal souls that go on to an afterlife, and God; the logical acceptance that 'summum bonum' can only be provided

  2. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    But, if we could measure 'good' completely and accurately, then we would be able to measure everything else against it. Yet, philosophically, it is impossible to define 'good' so completely. For instance, if one were asked to define 'yellow', one is able to say what yellow is like (such as

  1. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    be changed to either the best interest for the most people or the most preference for the most people. B) Now we have identified the major factors within utilitarianism I what to look at some of the critiques made against utilitarianism, and then see the responses to these critiques.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    This concept seems illogical and highly improbable. Morality is not simply about emotions or the way we feel about something; it can be debated rationally. By using human reasoning and recognition we do have verifiable evidence that some situations and experiences are more positive or beneficial than others.

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Only very few topics would ever reach the level of consideration by a regional or pan-Orthodox council. THE CONTENT AND THE STAND OF THIS ARTICLE What follows in this section represents this process in dealing with controversial issues. It seeks to express "the mind of the Church" on these issues,

  2. DNA and capital punishment

    They were not officially cleared and released until 1995. Now three prosecutors and four police officers have been indicted for obstruction of justice in this prosecution (Dieter).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work