• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the different ways in which 'right' and 'wrong' are used in metaethics

Extracts from this document...


Charles Johnson 20 January 2003 Explain the different ways in which 'right' and 'wrong' are used in metaethics In metaethics, the terms "right" and "wrong" show someone's feelings about a certain moral issue. Metaethics explores the meaning and function of moral language. Meta-ethicists explore what, if anything is meant by terms such as "good", "bad", "right" and "wrong". A meta-ethical question is "What do we mean when we say that sex before marriage is good?" One type of meta-ethics is ethical naturalism. This has the basic ideas that ethical terms can be defined or explained using the 'natural' terms that are used to define mathematics or science, and also that morals could be based on the same kind of observation of the world as used in science. Ethical naturalists say that moral truths are like numbers or chemical properties, and people use logic to conclude ethical truths. They will conclude that something is "wrong" from observation and analysis. This means that moral facts according to ethical naturalism aren't views or opinions (the persons feelings such as likes or dislikes). ...read more.


W. D Ross said in a moral dilemma, there are various duties or obligations that we hold that are apparent. We should follow a particular duty (the 'prima facie') unless a higher duty exists that compels us to pursue that instead. Ross also differentiated between thing that are right to do, and things that are good to do. To help an old lady across the road is the right action -the right thing to do- but if you are just doing it to gain praise from your minister who is also walking along the road, then it isn't good, because the motivation or intention isn't good. Emotivism and David Hume say that sentiment is the source of right and wrong. If you decide to help someone, you do so because of feelings, not reason. Hume believed that there was a common feeling for each other's welfare, and we all have a capacity for compassion, which has nothing to do with reason. He said you couldn't go from a factual statement (an 'is') ...read more.


The judgement that something is red is descriptive because it describes, but also it is universal because it applies to anything similar. Moral statements also hold this principle too- seen in the N. Testament ("do unto others what you would have done unto yourself"), and in Kant's teachings ("Act only on the maxim through which you can and at the same time will that it should become a universal law.") Hare argued that moral statements have this universalisability, and it is in our interest to prescribe the advice to others, as we would want to have such advice given to ourselves. In conclusion I can see that meta-ethics sees 'right' and 'wrong' in many different ways. Naturalists used reason to justify moral statements such as ones including "right" and "wrong", Intuitionists used a special moral sense to discover the correct moral statements, Emotivists denied the existence of moral facts as being meaningful in any way beyond personal opinion, and Prescriptivists produced an ethical theory that sought to make moral statements objective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain Kant(TM)s moral argument for the existence of God and Kant was wrong to ...

    They are: freedom; a given person is free to commit a moral action without obligation or obstruction, immortality; despite moral actions not being rewarded in this life we must have immortal souls that go on to an afterlife, and God; the logical acceptance that 'summum bonum' can only be provided

  2. "Examine the different ways in which 'good' is used in meta-ethics."

    Emotivists believe when we use the term 'good or make other moral judgements, we are simply expressing our feelings. So, therefore, if I say something is 'good,' this is simply an exclamation and therefore cannot be true or false and cannot be reasoned upon.

  1. Explain and discuss the four major theories of meta-ethics; Naturalism, Emotivism, Intuitionism and Prescriptivism.

    The fact that Ayer tried to explain that morals and facts are meaningless is a contradiction of himself, because isn't what he is saying simply an expression of his own opinion, with no evidence to support it? Others also reject Ayer's theory as they think their moral beliefs come from

  2. Discuss some of the issues raised in Meta-Ethics. How convincing is the view that, ...

    But, if we could measure 'good' completely and accurately, then we would be able to measure everything else against it. Yet, philosophically, it is impossible to define 'good' so completely. For instance, if one were asked to define 'yellow', one is able to say what yellow is like (such as

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    moral law and recognizes both of them as elementary for normativity due to reflective endorsement. Moral law tells us that our maxims must qualify as laws for the Kingdom of Ends. By virtue of which it becomes a substantive command.

  2. Explain what scholars mean when they say that ethical statements are no more than ...

    'Abortion is wrong, I disapprove of it', means 'Abortion? Boo!' Similarly, if I say 'Abortion is ok, I approve of it' what I really mean is 'Abortion?

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    Medicine is at last a collective enterprise, no longer a private one. It has turned into far more than a place; it is a system. The motive or inspiration behind medical care is still religion, as much as it always was in the past.

  2. Utilitarianism.After Bentham had established that pleasure and pain were the important factors in determining ...

    We discovered that there were two types of utilitarian a rule utilitarian and an act utilitarian, they rule utilitarian satisfies the community and the act tries to satisfy everybody. Then we looked at the flexibility of utilitarianism and how it can be applied to humans, and how the rule can

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work