• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain What Is Meant By Situation Ethics.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain What Is Meant By Situation Ethics. Religion has for a long time been a source of moral rules for many people. Probably the most famous set of rules is the 10 Commandments. An alternative view of moral rules is known as Situation Ethics. Situation ethics is an idea that was first developed by Joseph Fletcher. What Fletcher attempted to do was to create a compromise between having too many rules and no rules at all. Fletcher rejected the idea that everyone should follow a whole series of rules. Instead of a whole number of rules, Fletcher suggested that there is only one rule that everyone should follow. This rule is about love and was called 'the law of love'. Fletcher defines what people should do in terms of love: the right course of action is to do the most loving thing. Christian love is not based on desire; it is self-giving love or agape. ...read more.

Middle

Is one rule too general? It has been argued that Fletcher does not really give any real instructions about what morally ought to be done. If ethics can be reduced to one moral rule, which Fletcher believes it can, then this rule must be very general. The rule must be able to cover every eventuality. Another criticism is what about God? The traditional Christian view is whatever God does is love and essentially humans should try to follow this. However, Fletcher goes against this idea because, for Fletcher, it is the situation that determines what love is. Situation Ethics has been criticised on a number of important points. For example, in order to 'do the most loving thing' in every situation one must look to the long term consequences of one's actions in the present moment. But this is a difficult thing to do. We do not know if our actions will lead to heartache or joy but the promotion of love for the Situationist requires us to do so ...read more.

Conclusion

In this way one could take the 'primary precepts' of the Natural Law (for example, killing, stealing, lying and cheating) as foundations which should be adhered to unless there are good reasons not to. Despite accepting the Situationist's notion of love as the highest principle Proportionalists do not accept the view that love can make a wrong action right. However Proportionalists also face the same difficulties as Situationists do in trying to determine the outcome of an action committed in the name of trying to 'do the most loving thing' and the possibility of making a decision based on selfish reasons. In conclusion I think that Situation Ethics is too general a rule to follow. I think that it would be very hard to follow just one rule that is 'To do the most loving thing'. In a situation there may be three consequences and possible out comes, two out of those out comes may be the most loving thing to do, What do you do then. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Critically examine what is meant by natural moral law.

    to get the weapon off an axe murderer then it is ok to do so. I feel as though this is a complete cop out. In effect he is coming up with a set of rules that have to be universalised and they are based on reason, and then comes

  2. Describe and explain the distinctive features of 'natural law' and 'situation ethics'.

    However, both follow Christian principles; the difference comes where situation ethics looks to Christianity's general attitude, rather than its specific rules. On its release in 1963, Joseph Fletcher's book Situation Ethics was seen as a radical approach to Christian ethics.

  1. Examine what is meant by natural law with reference to morality and analyse and ...

    For example, taking drugs is, in most cultures considered morally wrong and is human law and although some people choose to take drugs, it is clear that the action is still morally wrong. The theory gives guidance on day-to-day questions of how to live and links them to the fundamental principles of life.

  2. Business Ethics

    There are three essential components of managing ethically: integrity, morality, and principle. Integrity as a manager involves developing and maintaining trust and mutual respect between the manager and those managed. Morality is a bit broader term and is based on a foundation of ethical goals, motives, and standards.

  1. Free essay

    Explain What Is Meant By natural law

    The fundamental primary principles of natural law are of great importance to Aquinas's theory. They are always true and always apply to everyone. They are: the preservation of life, continuation of species, educating children, lives in society and worshiping God, which is the most important.

  2. Business Ethics

    This helps also to boost the brand value of the firm. Customers will choose ethical engaged products and brands among a large diversity of products. For example, in the marketplace, corporate ethical reputations have a clear impact on the purchasing and investment decisions of Americans, but ethical lapses in the

  1. The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of ...

    Situation ethics is favourable because of its features - its flexible and practical and allows pragmatic decisions to be made when needed to be. Situation Ethics is can able to make tough decisions, where a legalistic perspective : all actions appear to be wrong.

  2. Explain what is meant by a Natural Law approach to ethics

    An example of this could be ?reproduction? which can lead to secondary precepts such as ?do not use? contraception, or alternatively ?do not participate in casual sex?. In theory secondary precepts are more open to variation and interpretation than primary precepts because they are much more specific.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work