• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Hume has shown miracles do not exist

Extracts from this document...


"Hume has shown miracles do not exist" Discuss David Hume is an empiricist and a sceptic; he believed that our knowledge of the world comes from the observations made by our senses. He also believed that we cannot reason accurately beyond what we see and hear as this requires us to make assumptions. Hume suggests that miracles are impossible. The laws of nature that we experience are uniform and constant; we assume that these laws will not be changed in the future and that they were constant in the past. To understand Hume's criticism of miracles it is necessary to consider his ideas on induction. Hume states that we develop cause and effect relationships based on our experiences of the world. This leads us to make predictions about what will happen in similar cases in the future. So, for example, you will predict that your kettle will come to the boil at 100 degrees, just as it has always done. ...read more.


This argument could be used to devalue examples or miracles from the Bible, perhaps these stories were sensationalised in order to gain more followers. His third point is that miracles are generally reported and believed amongst the 'ignorant and barbarous nations'. Hume believed that miracles don't happen with such regularity in modern times. This point can be backed up by evidence that in the past society was more religious and being less educated, or simply not knowing what we know today, would imagine many situations to occur because of a miracle. For example, having a baby or getting over an illness. His fourth, and final point, is that almost all religions carry miracle stories, yet they cannot all be true. The sets of testimonies would seem to cancel each other out because each faith alleges that the miracles they believe in provide evidence that their particular faith is true However, there are various arguments against Hume's rejection of the existence of miracles. ...read more.


John Polkinghorne defends the possibility of miracles and states that all science can tell us is that a given event is against normal expectations; it cannot completely disprove its happening. The laws of nature do not change yet the consequences of these laws can change when one moves into a 'new regime'. Consequences of the laws of nature may change if God begins to deal with humans in a new way. The resurrection of Jesus is a crucial miracle as it beings a new age in God's dealing with people. In conclusion, although Hume's arguments are perhaps more realistic than that of fundamental Christians such as Richard Swinburne and John Polkinghorne I find it very hard for miracles to be either proved or disproved entirely. The whole idea of a miracle is that it is a miraculous event which cannot be explained nor predicted, so although David Hume does well to make the idea of a miracle not existing likely he faces an impossible task in rendering Miracles impossible. By Dom Ansell 6PWL ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess Humes reasons for rejecting miracles

    According to Atkins it is only the publicity seeker or someone deluded or hallucinating who would claim to have witnessed such an event as they may lack the scientific level of understanding of their peers, therefore Hume's argument is relevant.

  2. The idea of miracles is a major obstacle to faith in the modern world ...

    Although serious doubt can be cast, many say that miracles by definition contradict know scientific laws, and since they are beyond the scope of science to explain, no amount of scholarship can confirm nor deny Jesus' miracles. David Hume would support the notion that we can neither completely disprove or prove that miracles happen.

  1. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    However, those with wealth in such a state who are members of the oligarchy, are not prohibited, we might assume, from the achievement of eudaimonia. Aristotle also argues directly against the view that material good are a core part of happiness.

  2. How, and with what success, does Hume deal with the apparent anomaly of the ...

    As stated before, Hume's project can be put into a general label of empiricism, which is a belief that all knowledge comes from experience. Much of his line of argument resembles that of Locke's, another prominent empiricist. Hume even borrowed Locke's key terminology to a certain extent, with terms like ideas and impressions.

  1. There is no Reason to Assume I will exist after my Death.

    Plato would have disagreed with Dawkins ideas. He not only believed in the concept of the soul and its existence but also that the soul is immortal. Plato was a dualist, this means that he believed that the body and soul were separate and that therefore the soul could survive the physical death of the body in a disembodied state.

  2. Article: "Will Brown Faces Again Be a Rarity?" by Jesus Mena.

    It is discussing the status quo. This is what Mena's story is analogous to. But, a fallacy is committed through loaded language by using the words "dramatic," "underrepresented," and "extremely." This language is loaded because its only purpose is to sway the emotions.

  1. Discussing John Dewey.

    is the only method which can do justice to this inclusive integrity of "experience." It alone takes this integrated unity as the starting point for philosophic thought. Other methods begin with results of a reflection that has already torn in two the subject-matter experienced and the operations and states of experiencing.

  2. Describe and explain the atheistic rejection of miracles

    be possible, starting with his belief that there has never been sufficient witness. Miracles are of necessity very rare and improbable. It is much more probable that the historical testimony is false than that the miracle actually occurred; therefore a wise man will not believe the historical testimony to the miracle since no testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work