• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is there a link between Morality and Religion?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is there a link between Morality and Religion? "Religion and morality go together like boiled beef and carrots. You often find them together but it is perfectly possible to have one without the other" Willett For centuries there has been this constant on going debate on whether there is or is not a link between morality and religion. Plato was one of the first to face the question laying the grounds for the Euthyphro dilemma. A discussion between himself and Socrates was based on a young man, Euthyphro. He had planned to prosecute his father after he had tied up drunken peasant involved in a fight. His father had intended to report him to the authorities however he forgot about the peasant, who of course eventually died. Euthyphro dismayed by the events, then set out to prosecute his father. The discussion leads then on whether that, "what human beings are morally oblige to do rest on what the gods command, or whether the gods only command what is good independent of their commanding it" It follows this idea of is x right because God wills it (This statement I will use for there being link between the two), or God wills x because it is right (This statement I will use for their not being a link between the two). ...read more.

Middle

display a link so I believe morality is separate from God, and perhaps the statement 'God wills x because it is right'. God is no longer the creators of morality but the omniscient mentor, and he knows what is best for us, meaning people are able to uptake this idea of morality without the essentialness of religion and god. But yet again certain issues are aroused disagreeing this idea Some people rely on this notion of God for making moral decision. They required religious sources in order for their quest for the right behaviour. People find it useful to make a connection in their mind that there is a link between the two, however subsequently there is no logical connection. God affectively needs no part in the bases of our moral, for basic moral principles might have be created through the logical truth ' x=x ', we know its true through logic not because "God decided to make it true" Gensler Nonetheless our morals still could come from God, but there is this debate related to moral autonomy, "principles are justified on the basis of reason or experience alone, without reference to religious concepts" Thompson We do not need religion; perhaps the normative is drawn through logic, empiricalism, and rationalism. Nonetheless certain religious group have done a complete opposite thing we are then dealing with this idea that could be moral heteronomy/theonomy- moral are influenced by society which in turn is influenced on religion. ...read more.

Conclusion

Morality links closely with our conscious (which some believe is the world of God), when we fail to fulfil our deontological commitment we bring upon ourselves a heavy sense of guilt. To relieve ourselves from this guilt we confess- a direct link for Catholics to make. However an issue raise with this link- do we confess to remove the guilt and been seen as morally correct in gods eyes, of do we out of fear. It could be through years of human conditioning by religion that we have made a link between morality and religion by referring a moral act under religion and God because of the fear of punishment? It is possible that we make our moral decisions not because they are morally correct, but because we "Simply act out of fear of punishment" Thompson I found myself agreeing strongly with Darwin, Hume and Rousseau. I believe those idea combined help us to establish morality totally independent from God, for they have no origin from him. But I also believe that God and religion plays a part in conditioning of moral, they are there to guide and mentor us, but not always necessary and essential to have when making a moral decision. Sources Author Book Title Billington Living Philosophy Davis Morality and Religion Gensler Ethics, a Contemporary Introduction Quinn & Taliaferro A Companion to Philosophy and Religion Russell Introduction to Philosophy of Western Society Singer A Companion To Ethics Singer Ethics Thompson Philosophy of Religion Aquinas and Natural Law ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Religion and Morality

    Some believe it is dangerous to link religion and morality as a lot of morally wrong things have happened either influenced by or in the name of religion e.g. the slave trade, 9/11, the crusades. We cannot ignore/excuse these events just because they are related to religion.

  2. religion linked to morality

    How can a new scientific technique which helps people to have children who are otherwise not able to, be morally wrong? Philosophers of the age of enlightenment have also shown that morality cannot be linked to religion. In the case of Darwin, he showed that non human animals show social

  1. (a) Examine the reasons why some argue that morality is linked ...

    Humanism emphasizes morals without religion and strongly refutes the view that morality must entail a religious base. Whereas the Christian regards morality as something that has been imposed on man from above by a supernatural lawgiver, the humanist regards it as something that has been worked out and is still

  2. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    However, there is no international authority to enforce these rules, whereas a government has the authority within its state to enforce the rule against murder. One would hence be inclined to agree with Hobbes who upheld the view that where there is no regulation, there are no rules, not many people abide by rules which are totally unregulated.

  1. Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with ...

    They cannot explain why we should believe in those objective reasons. They are not able to answer or provide to answer the normative question. Their belief in the existence of objective reasons and normative entities is merely based on their confidence to their mere beliefs that desires are normative.

  2. Self-interest plays no part in genuine morality

    A maxim means ground rule or principle. So I treat everyone as I would like to be treated by them. His second principle is telling us to not treat people as means to an end. That means that we should not use anyone as our means to an end.

  1. With reference to the topic of abortion , examine and comment on the controversies, ...

    It is argued that Vitalism makes life too absolute, so it becomes an idol of worship. Stanley Hauerwas disputed that the Church permits the taking of life when the well being of others is at risk. ?Appeals to the sanctity of life as an ideology make it appear that Christians

  2. Examine the key ideas of one critique of the link between religion and morality. ...

    God is no longer a ?law-giver? but at the most a ?law-transmitter? who plays no vital role in the foundations of morality. Plato?s first horn, which is ?Does God command X because it is good?? challenges ?creator ex nihilo? and God?s classical theistic characteristics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work