• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


"It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." Discuss. To answer this question, this essay will firstly describe and outline determinism and then secondly describe and outline freewill, giving examples to highlight these concepts. It will be argued that the above statement is true and false, it is not always impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill, but in particularly hard determinism is can be seen as impossible. Finally, it will be argued that especially two types of determinism (soft determinism and libertarianism) are reconciled with freewill. Determinism, a philosophical doctrine against freedom, is the theory stating that all events, physical and mental (including moral choices), are completely determined by previously existing causes that preclude free will. This theory denies the element of chance or contingency, as well as the reality of human freedom, holding that the "will" is not free but is determined by biological, environmental, social, or mystical imperatives. Since every event in our lives is determined by outside causes, then we are just some sort of robots. Freedom, on the other hand, is rooted behind the idea that we do have control over the choices we make, thus having free will, a requirement for being morally accountable for an action. But if determinism is true and we have no control over the choices we make, then we do not have free-will; and therefore, nobody can ever legitimately be held morally accountable for anything. ...read more.


A socio-economic disadvantaged child, raised by an inadequate parent, attending an under funded urban school, in a neighbourhood with few job opportunities has many fewer choices than does a child born into the upper class with all the benefits and privileges such standing accords. However, many kids in a disadvantaged neighbourhood will choose not to join gangs or become involved in delinquent behaviour. Many will create better lives for themselves and their children. If one adopts a soft determinist approach one believes some aspects of human beings are determined, but we are also morally responsible for our actions. Soft determinism doesn't rule out free will, the freedom to act is acting voluntarily and not out of coercion. Soft determinists are criticised by hard determinists for failing to realise the extent to which human freedom is limited, and by libertarians for failing to realise the degree of human freedom that exists. Soft determinists have not yet agreed on precisely what is and what isn't a determining factor in human action so it can become somewhat confusing. Consequently, soft determinists would say that the statement "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill" is false as they believe they are partially free as they have the freedom to act but also know they are restricted to the choices they are able to make due to being deficient in some understanding. If one takes a libertarian approach, one believes we are free and morally responsible for our actions as human beings have self-determination or freedom to act. ...read more.


Euthanasia is a massive dilemma as it is against the law in the UK, and any doctor who helps a terminally ill adult to die is open to a charge of murder. Thus doctors do not have the ability to assist terminally ill patients in their 'freewill' decision. I believe adults should have the freedom to make such choices in life, such as euthanasia, although I am aware of the reality that it will never be as simple. To finally conclude, in this essay I have outlined that it is possible to reconcile two kinds of determinism with the concept of freewill, soft determinism and libertarianism. This is because, on the whole they take into account the authenticity that humans do have the freedom to make their own decisions in their lives. However some soft determinists and libertarians are not confident as to how much freedom they have. They do not know to what extent they can use the concept of freewill. Alternatively some Christians may believe that God has already planned out their lives. He knows what will happen next and what choices they will make whether it is what top to wear or whether or not to have an abortion. This hard deterministic approach means that Christians may not believe in freewill as their lives are predetermined, not allowing them to make their own choices. This is not believed by all Christians though, and non-Christians may also agree with this hard deterministic approach. Rosa Lenders ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    This would be abuse of the system and in fact not be the best option when they still have a potential to lead a fulfilling and satisfying life. Jonathan Glover (British philosopher) notes that people will act depending on others, including if the consequences are dire for them.

  2. Every adult has the right to become a parent. Discuss

    From a Utilitarian perspective the happiness of a child should be taken into account, more than the parent's right to that child and they would therefore reject this claim. They would further argue that the happiness of the current population should also be a factor in deciding to have a

  1. Free essay

    Hard Determinism Negates Free Will, Discuss

    The Clarence Darrow case also supports the theory to negate the freedom of will. The strengths of Hard Determinism appears to be convincing, however many would argue that there are weaknesses and that it does not negate free will. Hard Determinism removes the principle of moral responsibility; therefore no one can be blamed for any actions.

  2. The concept of hell makes no sense discuss

    Therefore they would believe all non God believers would go straight to Hell and anybody who isn't a believer would not be saved, as Jesus stated in John's gospel, "I am the way the truth and the life, no man cometh unto the father, but by me."

  1. "Humanitarian intervention, which is ruled out by realism and the morality of states, can ...

    that of Kosovo, it is not necessarily simply because of one culture imposing its views on another culture. It is very difficult to prove what is part of one culture and not of another, or indeed part of any culture at all.

  2. Compare hard determinism and Libertarianism.

    We all have different methods varying in length and benefit- but the fact that we all do it shows we all possess free will. The critical idea in this is that for someone to make a decision they must believe they have a real choice.

  1. Hard determinism and the religious approach to ethical living are not compatible"

    and punishment by god, because there would be no need to fear god and the consequences of your actions if are destination was already predestined.

  2. Assess the claim that Free Will and Determinism are compatible

    He goes on to instigate that our existence precedes our essence - unlike an inanimate object such as a penknife, human beings have no pre-established purpose or nature. Our destiny is somewhat spontaneous. We can choose whether we are to become a singer or an astro naught for example.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work