• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Kant and the categorical imperative

Extracts from this document...


KANT & THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: MODEL ESSAY 1 (a) "Duty should be done, simply because it is duty." Explain how Kant analysed this concept. (33 marks) (b) "Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions." Discuss. (17 marks) (Part A): Kant tried to develop a theory of ethics which relied on reason rather than emotion. While he was not anti-religious, he wanted an ethical system which was not clouded by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. He placed emphasis on motives behind an action rather than, like the Utilitarians, the consequences of an action. He believed that consequences were no guide to whether an action was moral or not. His theory is known as deontological, or duty-based, where ends can never justify the means. He believed that there were general rules which must be adhered to in every circumstance. He called these absolute rules of what is good or bad 'Categorical imperatives'. These rules were rationally determinable. Individuals must never be reduced to the level that they are a convenience for the happiness of someone else. ...read more.


Not lying, to Kant, is an absolute imperative and he uses a priori reasoning to come to this conclusion. These moral rules are as reliable as mathematical proofs because they derive from first principles. Only free agents (people thinking for themselves and making their own decisions) can make moral decisions. There must be an element of choice - the choice to do good or bad. He assumed that we are all free agents. An action can only possess moral value when it is done for is own sake, for duty's sake, and not for the pleasure of the individual or in the hope of gaining specific outcomes. (Part B): Taken at face value, one could argue that "Categorical Imperatives allow no room for compassion in the treatment of women wanting abortions." This is because categorical imperatives are absolute rules which cannot be altered to suit an individual. To Kant, murder is always wrong and this would be the categorical imperative. Kant would have to be persuaded that this categorical imperative cannot be said to cover every abortion. ...read more.


If the moral rule - to end one life to save another, for example - can be universalised then compassion can be shown in the treatment of women who want abortions. If it is decided that when the mother's life is at risk abortion is allowed, it could be said that this is a principle everyone should practise if faced with this situation. It should be weighed up whether the best outcome would be achieved and whether it be the best rule if it became a general rule. If, in the case of abortion, the mother's life is saved, then this could become the general rule. An exception is not being made or an individual being given precedence over the categorical imperative, the categorical imperative itself has been re-evaluated. The scope of the categorical imperative has been narrowed. The universal, right thing to do is to kill the unborn child because it threatens the life of the mother. Compassion has been achieved although it is incidental; it does not make the action any more moral from the deontological point of view. Thus, the categorical imperative might allow abortion in some cases, but it takes no account of compassion. Andrew Bunce ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. RE euthanasia for and against

    The case resulted in his life support machine being switched off. The outcome was that his doctor could not be expected to preserve his life at all costs. This however leaves the moral question of should it have been switched off even though more could have been done?

  2. Compare Utilitarianism With Kant's Theory of The Categorical Imperative And Explain Which You Think ...

    Also, he rejects the teleological thinker's view that consequences can help us to decide upon the right course of action. Thus, he proposes a 'reason-based' case for moral behaviour. Kant's theory has strengths as well, that make it more practical when decision-making.

  1. Kant and the Categorical Imperative

    Firstly, one of the three principles of the categorical imperative is that each person has an intrinsic value; a value beyond price. This is because humans are rational beings, and can make decisions, based on their ability to reason this separates them from al life forms on this earth.

  2. Explain Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    If this were carried out, society today would become unbearable. > The Categorical imperative is morally unacceptable. Discuss! There are a number of moral dilemmas in today's world, however, the most applicable and useful for our purpose it could be argued.

  1. `Always tell the truth and Always keep your promises' Kant's Categorical Imperative.

    A hypothetical imperative, on the other hand, is neither absolute nor unconditional, and has only external or extrinsic value in the sense that we follow the imperative or the command for the sake not of itself, but for something else.

  2. The Conjoined Twins Jodie and Mary

    This case is strikingly similar to one of someone wishing to perform voluntary euthanasia, so why should this operation of practical murder be allowed to take place? The only difference between euthanasia and this case is that if the operation is to go ahead, it is without the consent of the person being killed - Mary.

  1. Does Kant's account of categorical imperatives and universal laws elucidate ordinary criteria for judging ...

    compassion, or a sense of duty - morality is open to every rational being; yet our inclinations are outside our conscious control. Kant offers a number of formulations of the categorical imperative, the first of which is, "Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same

  2. A Root-a-toot-Duty: An analysis of Kant’s Categorical Imperative

    The good will is the only unconditional good despite all infringements. Misfortune may render someone incapabable of achieving her goals for instance, but the goodness of her will remains. Goodness cannot arise from acting on impulse or natural inclination. It can only arise from conceiving one's action in a certain way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work