• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument-

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the Cosmological Argument- The Cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument; this means the argument is based on experience. The Cosmological argument's first premise is that the universe exists we all experience it. Cosmological is the name given to a group of arguments for the existence of God based on the fact that the universe exists. This belief has been suggested by Plato and Aristotle, developed by Aquinas, supported strongly by Leibniz and Samuel Clarke and most recently by Copleston. The Cosmological argument is often expressed in three sections: The Kalam Argument, the Thomistic Argument and the Argument from Contingency. The Kalam Argument suggests a beginning in time; Aquinas disregarded the idea that the universe had existed infinitely. , The idea that history is infinite causes philosophical problems. If we say history is infinite then we have to say that infinitude has happened but that time still passes and so infinity is being added to. Modern science finds evidence for the Big Bang. The universe began with the primeval nucleus, which exploded, traces of radiation were found from this explosion in the mid 20th century. ...read more.

Middle

But if everything has a cause so must God, this is answered with Aquinas' idea of the first cause the uncaused causer. Infinite regression is not comprehendible, and so a chain of causes must have its origins in a first cause something that does not rely on every thing else in the universe. The Big Bang supports the idea that the universe had a beginning. The idea of person relative proof can be applied to the argument, if a person is willing to define God as a necessary being who is the cause of the existence of contingent beings then the argument is successful, as a proof for Gods existence. The Cosmological argument relies on the acceptance of certain principle is a person can accept these ideas then the argument works. Is the argument convincing does it convince people that God exists? It may convince some people. Some people experience cosmic wonder, an experience of the contingency of things including their own existence. If a person accepts these experiences as meaningful they may well ask why is the universe here? And expects an answer. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument does not lead to the understanding of God as an omnipotent, omniscient, omni loving and moral authority. David Hume adds to the criticisms of the argument, he applies many of the ideas from the critique of the teleological argument for example he asks if one God why not many Gods how do we prove that this just one God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends first of all willingness to ask the question, why is there a universe? If you are content to simply accept that the universe is there and does not need explanation, or that it can be explained by infinite regress, then the Cosmological argument fails. But if the person is able to accept the ideas like sufficient reason which some have disregarded, then they could accept the Cosmological argument, it could convince them of the existence of God. It could be suggested that an argument that leads to a creator is useful as part of the traditional understanding of God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends on the persons approach for some it will be convincing or add to a faith and for other it will fail to answer the questions they have and will ultimately fail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    It seems that if there were no first moment, then an infinite amount of time would have to have passed before now. But it seems that an infinite amount of time can never have gone past, so there must have been a first moment.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Modern science has also triggered the cause-effect link to be put under scrutiny, particularly as Quantum scientists have seen some particles come into existence without a specific cause. On these grounds, then, one may argue that the weakness of the argument definitely outweigh its strengths.

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    it could be argued, we have some idea of where are going? Theists could obviously claim that if life begins with God then life has a purpose with God. However, atheists could argue that if life began from a series of natural causes then the purpose to life must be found in biology.

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    Another supporter of the Thomist argument is Copleston, who in his radio interview with Russell, argues that there must be an explanation of how things have come into existence, and the universe is not just 'brute fact,' as stated by Russell.

  1. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    However, there is a huge amount of criticism in Augustine's argument, with Schleiermacher arguing that there is a contradiction in the argument, as that a perfectly created world, designed by god, has gone wrong, and if the world were perfect, which is what Augustine argued, it would mean that evil created itself out of nothing.

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    hopes that one day, it will happen, but he is not going to force it. More examples of this anti-force opinion occur when he is discussing the types of government that he is against - timarchy, oligarchy, democracy and tyranny.

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    Space and time originate from within the universe and so the cause must be beyond space and time, and thus scientific explanation. Therefore the cause is personal, not physical. Aquinas? third way, from necessity and contingency states that everything is dependent upon factors outside of itself, thus they are contingent and have the possibility to not-be rather than be.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    true then would be no primary mover, thus no subsequent movers, but this is false; therefore there must be an unmoved prime mover which is the foundation of all motion and change whom we call God. His argument from causation follows the same route of reasoning, as first he claims

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work