• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument-

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the Cosmological Argument- The Cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument; this means the argument is based on experience. The Cosmological argument's first premise is that the universe exists we all experience it. Cosmological is the name given to a group of arguments for the existence of God based on the fact that the universe exists. This belief has been suggested by Plato and Aristotle, developed by Aquinas, supported strongly by Leibniz and Samuel Clarke and most recently by Copleston. The Cosmological argument is often expressed in three sections: The Kalam Argument, the Thomistic Argument and the Argument from Contingency. The Kalam Argument suggests a beginning in time; Aquinas disregarded the idea that the universe had existed infinitely. , The idea that history is infinite causes philosophical problems. If we say history is infinite then we have to say that infinitude has happened but that time still passes and so infinity is being added to. Modern science finds evidence for the Big Bang. The universe began with the primeval nucleus, which exploded, traces of radiation were found from this explosion in the mid 20th century. ...read more.

Middle

But if everything has a cause so must God, this is answered with Aquinas' idea of the first cause the uncaused causer. Infinite regression is not comprehendible, and so a chain of causes must have its origins in a first cause something that does not rely on every thing else in the universe. The Big Bang supports the idea that the universe had a beginning. The idea of person relative proof can be applied to the argument, if a person is willing to define God as a necessary being who is the cause of the existence of contingent beings then the argument is successful, as a proof for Gods existence. The Cosmological argument relies on the acceptance of certain principle is a person can accept these ideas then the argument works. Is the argument convincing does it convince people that God exists? It may convince some people. Some people experience cosmic wonder, an experience of the contingency of things including their own existence. If a person accepts these experiences as meaningful they may well ask why is the universe here? And expects an answer. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument does not lead to the understanding of God as an omnipotent, omniscient, omni loving and moral authority. David Hume adds to the criticisms of the argument, he applies many of the ideas from the critique of the teleological argument for example he asks if one God why not many Gods how do we prove that this just one God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends first of all willingness to ask the question, why is there a universe? If you are content to simply accept that the universe is there and does not need explanation, or that it can be explained by infinite regress, then the Cosmological argument fails. But if the person is able to accept the ideas like sufficient reason which some have disregarded, then they could accept the Cosmological argument, it could convince them of the existence of God. It could be suggested that an argument that leads to a creator is useful as part of the traditional understanding of God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends on the persons approach for some it will be convincing or add to a faith and for other it will fail to answer the questions they have and will ultimately fail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    the sense that all the members of the collection are present at once) are impossible. The story of Hilbert's Hotel shows that there is no logical problem with an infinite collection of actual objects.26 The only possible remaining worry is that there may be some problem with the notion of an infinite past.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    it could be argued, we have some idea of where are going? Theists could obviously claim that if life begins with God then life has a purpose with God. However, atheists could argue that if life began from a series of natural causes then the purpose to life must be found in biology.

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    He said that should we be able to explain the causes of, say, each particle out of a group of twenty, it would be unreasonable to go on to ask what the cause of the whole twenty would be. If we have explained each part of a series, have we not explained the whole?

  2. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Would they be justified in breaking the law of something that they don't believe in? A true authority would mean that the law would either be unbreakable morally or that their authority was so powerful that people could not, or would not, break the law.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    There are several weaknesses to the Cosmological Argument, suggested by different philosophers. Hume was the first to find a weakness in the argument. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, he asked why must we conclude that the universe has a beginning: "How can anything that exists from eternity have a cause,

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    Hell is portrayed by Augustine as part of God's design of the universe, which means He must already have anticipated that the world would go wrong and have accepted that this would happen. This raises various problems that if God knew His world was going to go wrong, can we still regard His creation as perfect?

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    He then proposes a notion that does not require a God or first mover and then reduces it to absurdity, as he goes on to say, conceive of a universe were everything was a secondary mover, which would result in an infinite regress of movers, and so if this were

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    He believed that motion was the reduction of something from having the potential to move or change to actually moving or changing. For this to happen, it has to be put into motion by another, and the same for the one before.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work