• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Cosmological Argument-

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline the Cosmological Argument- The Cosmological argument is an a posteriori argument; this means the argument is based on experience. The Cosmological argument's first premise is that the universe exists we all experience it. Cosmological is the name given to a group of arguments for the existence of God based on the fact that the universe exists. This belief has been suggested by Plato and Aristotle, developed by Aquinas, supported strongly by Leibniz and Samuel Clarke and most recently by Copleston. The Cosmological argument is often expressed in three sections: The Kalam Argument, the Thomistic Argument and the Argument from Contingency. The Kalam Argument suggests a beginning in time; Aquinas disregarded the idea that the universe had existed infinitely. , The idea that history is infinite causes philosophical problems. If we say history is infinite then we have to say that infinitude has happened but that time still passes and so infinity is being added to. Modern science finds evidence for the Big Bang. The universe began with the primeval nucleus, which exploded, traces of radiation were found from this explosion in the mid 20th century. ...read more.

Middle

But if everything has a cause so must God, this is answered with Aquinas' idea of the first cause the uncaused causer. Infinite regression is not comprehendible, and so a chain of causes must have its origins in a first cause something that does not rely on every thing else in the universe. The Big Bang supports the idea that the universe had a beginning. The idea of person relative proof can be applied to the argument, if a person is willing to define God as a necessary being who is the cause of the existence of contingent beings then the argument is successful, as a proof for Gods existence. The Cosmological argument relies on the acceptance of certain principle is a person can accept these ideas then the argument works. Is the argument convincing does it convince people that God exists? It may convince some people. Some people experience cosmic wonder, an experience of the contingency of things including their own existence. If a person accepts these experiences as meaningful they may well ask why is the universe here? And expects an answer. ...read more.

Conclusion

The argument does not lead to the understanding of God as an omnipotent, omniscient, omni loving and moral authority. David Hume adds to the criticisms of the argument, he applies many of the ideas from the critique of the teleological argument for example he asks if one God why not many Gods how do we prove that this just one God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends first of all willingness to ask the question, why is there a universe? If you are content to simply accept that the universe is there and does not need explanation, or that it can be explained by infinite regress, then the Cosmological argument fails. But if the person is able to accept the ideas like sufficient reason which some have disregarded, then they could accept the Cosmological argument, it could convince them of the existence of God. It could be suggested that an argument that leads to a creator is useful as part of the traditional understanding of God. The success of the Cosmological argument depends on the persons approach for some it will be convincing or add to a faith and for other it will fail to answer the questions they have and will ultimately fail. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    though we observe a conjunction of events, they are in fact two separate events occurring at separate times. He argued that it is just the habit of the mind to make a connection between two events- a process called induction.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    there is no reason to think that there is some one time when everything has corrupted. In the same way, it might be that everything has a time when it doesn't exist, but it is a different time for each thing.

  1. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    Another supporter of the Thomist argument is Copleston, who in his radio interview with Russell, argues that there must be an explanation of how things have come into existence, and the universe is not just 'brute fact,' as stated by Russell.

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    of good and evil, there could possibly be freedom to either obey or disobey God. Both good and evil were unknown: how therefore could Adam and Eve choose to do either the right or the wrong thing? The fact that God's creatures chose to disobey Him would seem to suggest that there was already knowledge of evil.

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    I am using to write these words on; exists then there must have been individuals who were responsible for the computers design. It is certainly true that if they had not lived (existed) then this computer would quite possibly not be in front of me today.

  2. Cosmological argument

    after overcoming the struggle they have been through and even natural disasters seem to bring people together to overcome the situation, it seems that within the world we often see the best of people in the worst situations. However if this was indeed Gods plan it still seems as though

  1. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    He then goes on to say that necessary things either have their cause of necessity in itself or outside of it, dependent on something else. If it were true that every necessary thing has their cause outside themselves, then there would be no ultimate cause of necessity; therefore there must

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    However, this series cannot be infinite, for then there would be no first mover and thus no motion. We can see motion in the universe, and thus there must be a first mover, which has been moved by no other, that explains the bringing about of motion and change, and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work