• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the key features of The Problem of Evil and two solutions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Philosophy Outline the key features of The Problem of Evil and two solutions Introduction The Problem of Evil has been a difficult subject for theists over a long period of time. The two atheists Hume and Dawkins suggest that evil is the major flaw in religion. As according to 18th century atheist David Hume, the problem of evil is ?the rock of atheism?, while Dawkins disputes that religion is the ?root to all evil?. The Problem of Evil presents a God that contrasts with theist?s classical definition, that he is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent. However, if a God with these specific characteristics existed, he would be able to get rid of evil, for an all knowing God and all powerful God would have the strength and knowledge to get rid of it. This is described J.L. Mackie?s inconsistent triad, as Mackie suggests that the three characteristics of God?s classical theism cannot be present while evil exists. The Problem of Evil is an emotive topic and this can influence our response. ...read more.

Middle

Irenaeus also suggested that evil is needed for people to understand what is good. Without evil, we would not be able to comprehend the difference between the two. "How, if we had no knowledge of the contrary, could we have instruction in that, which is good?" Irenaeus is saying that evil is necessary in order for individuals to appreciate good. Some goods are only possible in the face of evil, such as suffering, which enables us to forgive our enemies. Sometimes adversity helps to push things along, other times it doesn?t. If we didn?t have these problems, it?s a possibility we wouldn?t be rising to them as we are. Hick developed the Irenaean theodicy further by describing the world as a ?vale of soul making? a description that he borrowed from Keats. He stated that we are purposely created at an epistemic distance from God, as this is the only way we can be free. If everyone had knowledge of God, no one would have free choice because they would be compelled to follow his commandments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pain then becomes an important tool for our betterment in the hands of an all-seeing God of eternity. C.S Lewis replies by suggesting that the best possible universe should not be one where everyone is forced to be perfect, but rather one with free will that allows humans to grow and develop, strengthening their faith. To conclude, I think the Problem of Evil cannot be solved. The reason for this is because humankind is not powerful enough to defeat natural evil. Although individuals can intervene with moral evil by sharing empathy amongst others and caring for them when they suffer, we cannot prevent natural disasters or unexpected deaths. This is the price we must pay to live a life of free will, as freedom brings disadvantages. To this extent, evil cannot be solved. However, the suffering of war and human sin can be prevented to a certain extent if people were to consider the consequences of their actions and turn their attention to society, rather than themselves. But even this cannot be pursued fully as the whole purpose of free will is that people cannot be controlled, therefore we cannot force people to think or act in certain ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    which ones are not, but rather on what sort of qualities someone must foster in order to become a good person. In other words, while some virtue theorists may not criticize, for example, murder as a naturally immoral or impermissible sort of action, they may argue that someone who commits

  2. The Goodness of God

    and concludes that the point of having freedom is not worth it. This also provokes the other debate of the difference between moral and natural evil. Free will can of course provoke human evil such as wars and murder but natural evil has nothing to do with people.

  1. Explain how the theodicy of Irenaeus differs from that of Augustine and Evil cannot ...

    This evil would be categorised as natural evil. Irenaeus believed that although humans were made in God's image we were not made in his likeness and that through our trials in this world we must grow and mature towards this ultimate goal. Moral evil is again the product of free will, a gift from God.

  2. In what ways may suffering create philosophical problems for religious believers? Outline two solutions ...

    Evil came about as a result of the misuse of free will, as all suffering is therefore a consequence, as well as a punishment for the abuse of free will. What is interesting to note is that Augustine tries to say that evil is a privation, which in this case

  1. problem of evil

    it was created before the world's flaws began to appear, which means that God must have anticipated and accepted that the world would go wrong. F.D.E Schleiermacher expresses his logical contradiction to Augustine's views on the origin of evil and a perfect world going wrong, Schleiermacher informs us that whether

  2. Explain the problem of evil (25 marks). Are the theodicies attempts to ...

    Augustine's theodicy places all blame for evil in the world (both natural and moral) , as being caused by the freely chosen acts of God's creatures , herein lies the freewill defence.

  1. What is meant by the problem of evil and suffering for religious believers? Examine ...

    Humans were created imperfectly because attaining the likeliness of God requires willing cooperation from individuals, for which God gave them freewill. The universe was created with the possibility of evil, and humans have freewill to do both good and evil.

  2. Examine two solutions to the problem of suffering

    had gone wrong; either the world wasn't perfect to begin with or God had created it to go wrong. This leads to another criticism of Augustine; Science. All scientific explanations of the universe suggest evolution, that humanity along with everything else is evolving to get better, for example the eye.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work