• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the main features of virtue ethic

Extracts from this document...


Outline the main features of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is person rather than action based it looks at the virtue or moral character of the person carrying out an action, rather than an ethical duty or rule, or even the consequences of particular actions. Virtue ethics not only deals with the rightness or wrongness of the actions of an individual, but it provides guidance to the sort of quality and behaviours a good person will seek to achieve. It's a useful theory since human beings are often more interested in assessing the character of another person than they are in assessing the goodness or badness of a particular action which a person may not usually think about when doing or seeing an action. This suggests that the way to build a good society is to help its members to be good people, rather than to use laws and punishments to prevent or deter bad actions, instead of saying that the person is bad, you can instead say the action they are doing or have done is wrong. Virtue theory asks the question of how you can be a better person and it defines good people and the qualities that make them good. Most virtue ethics theories take their inspiration from Aristotle who was the founder of virtue ethics and said that it is good to be courageous, but that you can have too much courage. ...read more.


Another way, Aristotle would ask if the house, clothes and food would make a poor person happier. If they would, they must be part of this life and it is as good as it gets. Physical well-being, food, clothing, housing etc. are called 'external goods', which shouldn't always have to make a person happy. He argues that modern ethics has lost sight of its roots and has forgotten all that has gone before, he see's that a moral society as one in which people recognise commonly agreed virtues and strive to meet them, those virtues improve and clarify themselves over time. Virtue theory encompasses all aspects of life rather than particular actions, rather than simply looking for rules, virtue ethics looks at the most important issues of what it is to be human, although arguably virtue ethics ultimately depends on moral duty and moral absolutes. It demands that you effectively define the virtue, but how you do this is far from clear, it then offers reintroduction of an important element of ethics that focuses on the person, rather than the act that is being carried out and the consequences at the end. To what extent do the weaknesses outweigh the strengths of the theory? The biggest criticism of Virtue Ethics is that it doesn't give clear guidance on how to act in specific circumstances, although a strength to back ...read more.


Proponents may also mention the strength of virtue ethics to be a simple system based on a universal well-being for the individual and community, meaning that it is easy to follow and to understand making it easy for everyone universally and not being restricted by cultural or religious differences. Other strengths to bring down the weaknesses could be that how do we decide which virtues should be cultivated the most, and in which situations, as it universally applied and easy to follow and understand we may not be sure when and where we should use these virtues making it more complicated then its made out to be, and some virtues may be used I different situations by one person where another may not agree, making it hard to be sure whether your doing the right thing or not. The theory seems to be held in a fine balance of strengths and weaknesses that more than likely outweigh each other giving an equal balance to the argument and theory's and that it is fair to say that they both demonstrate all the issues that is addressed in virtue ethics and is a result that this argument is a good one to follow and rather as it being look at as a theory as a 'tool' in the ethical problem solving it could be seen as a 'tool kit' and instead of only solving one moral dilemma it is able to solve many. Ashleigh Johnson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Situation ethics

    3 star(s)

    includes in certain situations so if someone is willing to be selfish they will break the law of love as easily as any other moral principle. There are, however, a few advantages of Situation Ethics. The first is that it is consistent with Jesus of the Gospels.

  2. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    I do it, for Plato you act justly for its own sake. So how would the just man know what actions are virtuous and which are not; This is where the theory of the forms can be introduced, according to Plato we live in a world of appearances of which

  1. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    We live in the capitalist society that the new masters need in order to keep their power. The upshot of which is that we all work for somebody else, and are reliant on somebody else to survive. Very few of us are not dependant on a corporation that is ultimately owned by a rich 'master' businessman.

  2. Explain the theory of Virtue Ethics

    This associates itself with eudaimonia, which is deserving to be happy. Eudaimonia means more than just happiness it is about being worthy of the joy that you as a person are receiving. For Aristotle Eudaimonia is the highest good because it is desired for its own sake, rather than ulterior motives.

  1. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    Even if these acts can be explained through medical terms (i.e. the body began producing excess amounts of certain chemicals), the trigger to that medical occurrence was the person's will. Through sheer mental force, they altered their body's natural tendencies in order to better reach their goals.

  2. Happiness or Duty: Aristotle and Kants Approach on Moral Reason

    Taking this idea further, it can be used in a more applicable manner. The extremes of pleasure and pain; knowing the right amount of pleasure and the right amount of pain allows someone to make moral decision while at the same time remaining humble and knowing that too much pleasure makes one become greedy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work