• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Structuring the Human Mind.

Extracts from this document...


Ali Rabbani Intro to Cultural Criticism and Theory February 15, 2001 Structuring the Human Mind Etienne Bonnot De Condillac writes in An Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge that "in order to develop the real cause of the progress of the imagination, contemplation and memory, we must inquire what assistance these operations derive from the use of signs" (51). Condillac speculates that the senses, used to recognize signs, lead to reflection and thought (Condillac 13). Therefore, Condillac, along with many other philosophers argue that human thought cannot exist without the use of signs. Condillac defines signs as "those which we have chosen ourselves, and bear only an arbitrary relation to our ideas" (51). Ferdinand de Saussure agrees with Condillac's argument: "Psychologically, setting aside its expression in words, our thought is simply a vague, shapeless mass. Philosophers and linguists have always agreed that were it not for signs, we should be incapable of differentiating any two ideas in a clear and constant way. ...read more.


Thus, signs add structure to human thought, a quality that Saussure refers to as shape. Saussure asserts that without signs, thought is a "shapeless mass." Before the human mind has access to signs, there is no way to structure thought and differentiate one thing from another. The human mind's structure doesn't become determinate until language is introduced, illustrating the last line of Saussure's statement. Several implications may be drawn from these concepts. The first implication one may draw from Saussure's argument is that personal thought is controlled by language. Thus, one could argue that Saussure does not agree with the concept of personal identity due to the nature of language. Assuming that the thought process cannot occur without language, one must note that all individuals in a certain social community are governed by the same structure (language) when creating a thought. Personal thought, then, is nothing more than putting together what has already been constructed by the linguistic structure. ...read more.


The idea that language constructs reality provides a further implication. Noting that different languages express different concepts that cannot be translated (Culler, 21), one must assert that different social communities possess different realities. Saussure's argument's insinuation of no pre-existing human reality relates to the notion that the sign is arbitrary (Saussure, 68). Signs have no pre-existing correlation with the ideas they represent, supporting the conception that language creates a reality. Thus, Saussure's argument draws implications on the limitations of reality. Ferdinand de Saussure's argument that without signs, "our thought is simply a vague, shapeless mass" provides a new perspective on life. Although difficult to accept, Saussure shows language limits human thought. Furthermore, Saussure illustrates the extent of dependence humans have on language. Without language, humans would have no recognition of the world around them; no reality. Saussure explains that humans are born without intrinsic structure of the mind. Perhaps Saussure's Course in General Linguistics had influence on what would become existential philosophy. The main principle of existentialism being "existence before essence" complies with Saussure's argument and even seems to be derived from it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Writing to argue.

    * Find some common ground between you and your reader to generate trust and goodwill in you as a person and as a thinker. "Selling" yourself will help your reader decide to "buy" your ideas. "BODY" (CENTRAL) PARAGRAPHS * Open each paragraph with a "topic" sentence that introduces the points created from your planning above.

  2. Ensayo de teoria de conocimiento

    analizada ya que de acuerdo a mi suposici�n se puede cuestionar lo siguiente: �Qu� se puede caminar por siempre y nunca llegar? La respuesta es sencilla: el horizonte. La utilizaci�n del horizonte como met�fora de conocimiento es muy acertada, dependiendo de c�mo se percibe el conocimiento.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work