• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The differences between the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The differences between the Cosmological Argument and the Teleological Argument for the existence of God. The Cosmological Argument varies from the Teleological Argument for the existence of God. In brief detail, the Cosmological Argument explains in detail on how event will cause another event or effect. By this meaning that if one hundred dominoes are all lined up and they fell in line, domino number 100 would be the last to fall and would fall because domino number 99 made it, and domino number 98 made domino number 99 fall and so on. However, none of the dominoes would fall what so ever if domino number 1 hadn't been knocked down by someone or something. This example is simplifying how that everything must have an event and effect in history to this very day. ...read more.

Middle

Even if you just take a hedgehog for instance, even though they are very small, they very complicated in design, i.e. the way that they adapt to winter, the way that their lungs work, the food they eat, all these things have been planned. Then if you next look at the whole world, how could something so big and so extremely complicated just happen? Each argument for the existence of God is deeply thought out and makes some good points, however they both have their weak and strong points. The man who wrote the Teleological Argument is called F.R Tennant. The Teleological Argument is just stating that there must have been a designer to produce such a magnificent thing like the world, but is not however proving that there is a God and that he was the designer of the world. ...read more.

Conclusion

Where as the Teleological Argument doesn't speak of the past or future but just simply says that the universe is designed in such a way that life evolved into existence. In conclusion, both arguments are different and may or may not convince an Atheist that there is a God. There are so many arguments, which develop over the years trying to prove there is an existing God but who's to say which one is right? Some may be more believable than others may but there are always two sides to every story. You could take the Teleological Argument for instance and say how can you compare something like a watch, which we know has a designer to something as huge as the universe. Just because something is complicated and fits like a watch, which was obviously thought through and designed by someone, doesn't prove that the same thing happened in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Examine the strength of the cosmological argument for the existence of god

    Then argument is attacked by, the question 'If everything requires a cause, why doesn't God require a cause?' If we can't say the universe 'just is' than why can we say god is? This would mean that a list of causers would go on forever and not answer anything rather

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    With the Kalam cosmological argument, however, it is precisely because the universe is thought to have a beginning in time that the existence of the universe is thought to stand in need of explanation The crucial premise of the Kalam cosmological argument, then, is the second: "The universe has a beginning of its existence".

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    However, there is no way of showing that this possible being is also an actual being.32 Ockham's claim is that the most that the cosmological argument can establish is the most perfect being that actually exists and there is

  2. Ontological Argument - Edexcel A2

    can better his position by adding a few noughts to his account. Others, like Russell, say that existence is not a property of something; one cannot add or remove existence at will from something, just as one could not add or remove colour from a painting.

  1. Explain the cosmological argument for existence of God

    It is therefore logical to see how the two fit together to give a greater understanding. For example wood has the potential to turn into fire, but it needs the cause of a spark in order to move from potentiality to actuality and turn into the fire.

  2. Outline the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God.

    that the universe has a fixed amount of energy which can be converted to different forms, but never created or destroyed. Thus if these theories are accepted, the statement 'things can either exist or not exist' is only partially correct.

  1. Outline the teleological argument for the existence of God.

    Just as the apparent design of the watch implies a designer, so to does the apparent design of the world. This designer, Paley claims, is God. Paley makes a number of additional statements to his analogy, in order to uphold its relevance in anticipation of criticism.

  2. Explain the Cosmological argument for the existence of God.

    Aristotle asks human beings to consider two statements, firstly " The universe has an ultimate cause" and secondly, " The universe has no ultimate cause" by showing that the latter appears to be an impossibility, he only leaves us with one option , being that there must be one ultimate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work