• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is conscience fixed?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is conscience fixed? Phrases such as "Follow your conscience" and "Do what your conscience tells you" suggest that one's conscience is a fixed sort of thing, an unchanging absolute. Indeed, it often sounds like one's conscience is innate, something we're born with. And something quite separate from us, a sort of 'inner voice' (the voice of God?). Chomsky may have proven that there are innate structures of language in the human brain, but to date, no one has proven there are, in the human brain, innate moral principles. The dictionary definition of conscience is that, it is a moral sense of right and wrong, especially as felt by a person and affecting behaviour an inner feeling as to the goodness or otherwise of one's behaviour . The idea of conscience given to us by God is a belief, which is adhered too by many and has helped develop ideas on the formation and fixation of conscience. ...read more.


Within both religious and secular beliefs that conscience changes and develops there is a prominence of free will, this is key in the proposal of conscience because without conscience, to deceiver from right and wrong, there can be no moral blame. Many theories go against this idea such as hard determinism as it states all human choices have a cause, which precedes it. Within this theory humans are seen as less free and more like machines, they are governed by environmental and genetic factors, just like it is believed conscience is. Libertarianism however states that if we are to retain moral responsibility, we must reject determinism and accept that a person can, when confronted with the choice between right and wrong. Within this theory of libertarianism, conscience linked to free will is split between personality which is an empirical concept, capable of scientific and personality which is formed by heredity and environmental factors, however it is possible for the moral self will counteract it and cause the person to do something else. ...read more.


If crimes are justified in the name of compassion, they therefore have also been justified in the name of conscience. The intuitive judgement of conscience may vary from person to person. Their judgements take into account desires and principles, but when these do not result in one single decision conscience plays its part. Butler states nevertheless that conscience is not a divine voice within the human heart, although he does believe that it is made in the divine image of God. Nor does he believe that conscience is a separate existence or identity. It has been suggested that Butlers thinking may be misleading as conscience stands for something in us which is the very essence of our humanity, it is considered dangerous however to place complete belief in the conscience as essence to humanity. Supporters of Butler's ideas suggest that by placing influence on the conscience as the essence of humanity he wishes to deepen and extend our understanding of what it is to be a human being. Gavin Huggett ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Evaluate the claim that conscience is the voice of God

    This approach would seem to be an innate sense and knowledge of right and wrong that comes directly from God, he called it 'our natural guide', it was the final judge of right and wrong that must be obeyed. What our conscience says, we must do.

  2. "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill." ...

    Libertarians would disagree with the statement "It is impossible to reconcile any kind of determinism with the concept of freewill" because they believe we have the freedom to act and have moral responsibility. We are free to make our own choices and decisions.

  1. Discuss critically the belief that conscience is the voice of God.

    They had pursued an apparent good and not a real good, thus their consciences were mistaken. Rather than being a voice that commands one thing or another, conscience is 'reason making right decisions.' He said there were two parts to making moral decisions; 'synderesis' is right reason, an awareness of

  2. To what extent, if at all, should conscience be ignored when making ethical decisions?

    Whatever the true source of conscience is, from past experience we ignore conscience at our peril. Kant believed that whether or not you are religious, conscience should be obeyed as all people know the moral law internally and so must apply it externally in everyday life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work